Duderbot

Duderbot t1_jdn7qlv wrote

The last statement you made is what I meant. Modernization isn't a great term but I really didn't want to come out the gate being overly aggressive. The bottom line is this - there are people on the city council who will not do something if it benefits working class to poor people in this city. Especially, if they aren't white.

1

Duderbot t1_jbmh30l wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Jim McGovern in the news by jpm01609

I mean, can you name another speaker in recent history that was in the same position as McCarthy? He's on a short leash that's being held by Gaetz, Boebert, Gomer, etc. Did you forget how Gaetz went out of his way to make McCarthy's road to speaker as humiliating as possible? Biden's administration has already said there won't be any negotiations regarding the debt ceiling. Everyone knows he isn't really in charge of anything. He has a weak hand.

Edit - I guess my basic point is, I can't think of any politician openly capitulating to a small group within his own party like he did. It was embarrassing.

5

Duderbot t1_jbc066i wrote

Cold Harsh Reality:

Bitching on the internet wont solve this issue. Do you know why? LESS THAN 17% OF REGISTERED VOTERS VOTED IN THE LAST MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS. Not 17% of the population of Worcester. 17% of registered voters.

So, that means a small fraction of people in this city elect officials who will never raise taxes to improve sanitation the way people here want it. The status quo will continue, because most of the residents of this city can't be bothered to vote.

This point covers 99% of the shit people bitch about Worcester. Worcester sucks for you because nimby boomers like it the way it is. They vote. Statistically, most of you don't. So fuck you. Cry harder into your inadequately small recycling bucket.

2