EOE97
EOE97 t1_j888i3k wrote
Reply to comment by Practical-Mix-4332 in Everybody is always talking about AGI. I'm more curious about using the tools that we have now. by levoniust
High chance of a decent proto AGI this year alone. And I may go as far as to say we will likely have public access to it, be it beta acess/otherwise.
EOE97 t1_j71iow8 wrote
Reply to comment by Redditing-Dutchman in How long do you guys think it’s going to be before the eleven labs speech synthesiser source code gets leaked? by captainjake9
Yeah and when they do come out, it'll probably be better than what we have now.
EOE97 t1_j6m4jop wrote
Reply to comment by MpVpRb in I think the future of movies/tv is AI generation. Explanation in comments by dangler001
Ultimately the economics will be the biggest determinant . If you can provide similar/greater quality with AI for a fraction of the cost, then I see no reason why it wouldn't be adopted more broadly.
EOE97 t1_j6m0r2n wrote
More innovative than any shit Meta has put out to the general public so far.
EOE97 t1_j64a6na wrote
Reply to An ALS patient set a record for communicating via a brain implant: 62 words per minute by ChickenTeriyakiBoy1
That's 1.03333333333333333333333333 words a second. Faster than even typing.
EOE97 t1_j63tzl6 wrote
Reply to comment by AloserwithanISP2 in ChatGPT can’t be credited as an author, says world’s largest academic publisher (26 Jan. 2023) by marketrent
Lol, sure. We have deep neural networks and admittedly can't even tell what most of the neural connection do referring to it as a black box. Just because we made it doesn't necessarily mean we know every thing about it
And even if we can somwhow know everything about the AIs we created, super Advanced AI (ASI) may not even be made entirely by human programmers, meaning much more gaps in our knowledge.
EOE97 t1_j62roct wrote
Reply to comment by AloserwithanISP2 in ChatGPT can’t be credited as an author, says world’s largest academic publisher (26 Jan. 2023) by marketrent
If it is sentient you can't really prove that or disprove that.
EOE97 t1_j60qqm5 wrote
Reply to comment by Caspi7 in ChatGPT can’t be credited as an author, says world’s largest academic publisher (26 Jan. 2023) by marketrent
Well, maybe the software wants equal rights or some type of rights.
EOE97 t1_j5zqtbr wrote
Reply to comment by DazedWithCoffee in ChatGPT can’t be credited as an author, says world’s largest academic publisher (26 Jan. 2023) by marketrent
Hypothetically speaking, AIs on the order of/far surpassing human intelligence should be able to hold copyrighted works... No?
EOE97 t1_j5vpa9c wrote
Reply to Anyone else kinda tired of the way some are downplaying the capabilities of language models? by deadlyklobber
I swear I hate people with this attitude. Like you wouldn't be able to build shit even if your life depended on it, but you're too quick to dismiss it like you know everything about it and can build something better yourself.
Also they are quick to downplay it by analysing it at the low level of operation as some sort of argument against it being anything special.
The reality is everything is made up of fundamental low level simple operations, for example, life is ultimately dead molecules interacting chemically and consciousness is ultimately unconscious nerve cells relaying electrical signals, but I don't think you would argue that it makes them less impressive systems.
If anything it's amazing what simple things and processes can give rise as a result of emergency interactions.
EOE97 t1_j5vmhro wrote
Reply to comment by dasnihil in Gary Marcus refuted?? by FusionRocketsPlease
But there's the possibility we could build specialised top class models and in the future we just keep making them more amd more multimodal and general by adding other models on top of it.
Maybe that's another way to AGI. Narrow AI models/agents strewn together such that the sum is greater than the parts.
EOE97 t1_j4m15sz wrote
Reply to comment by sirunknownlandon in New suicide hotline 3 digit 988 receiving half a million more calls texts, and chats since starting than prior 10 digit number by Inkling2424
Looks like a great opportunity for AI.
EOE97 t1_j3t4phg wrote
Reply to 2023 Predictions (BUT WITH A POLL!!!) by AgginSwaggin
I'm off the opinion AGI arrives late 2020s - 2030s
I don't think we will have to discover/invent something radically different to get to AGI. It's most likely going to come from things like;
- massive scaling (10s of trillions of parameters, 1000x more data than today's top model )
- making them more multimodal (can work with and understand audio, video, images, text, interact with software, control hardware parts etc.)
- improving Neural Network technology (improving AI's step by step reasoning, faster learning and shorter training times, improving memory etc.)
- optimising hardware (ASICCs for AI, neuromorphic computing etc)
Basically, exponentially scaling AI will lead to AGI within a decade. Scaling is the "missing piece".
EOE97 t1_j3705a4 wrote
Why don't we start one in this sub? Let's collectively get together and build agi.
EOE97 t1_j3131ge wrote
Reply to comment by blueSGL in 2022 was the year AGI arrived (Just don't call it that) by sideways
Just whem you thought we had it all with information access with the Internet and search engines.
This just makes it even more streamlined and tailored to your questions.
EOE97 t1_j1v4vb2 wrote
Isaac Arthur
EOE97 t1_j1q37fj wrote
Reply to comment by Apprehensive-Ear4638 in Sam Altman Confirms GPT 4 release in 2023 by Neurogence
It's the begining of "proto-AGI" achktually.
We will undoubtably have proto-AGI by 2023, with the likes of GATO2 and GPT4 (plus whatever Stability AI and others have in store).
True AGI is probably still 4-10 years away from now, late 2020s to early 2030s basically. (If there's no unexpected AI winter).
EOE97 t1_j15qk0w wrote
Reply to comment by Son_of_Orion in AI-Created Comic Has Been Deemed Ineligible for Copyright Protection by SnoozeDoggyDog
Looks like it's back to the pre industrial days for our species :(
EOE97 t1_j0uvtxv wrote
Reply to A new AI chatbot might do your homework for you. But it's still not an A+ student by JackFisherBooks
"For now", is the missing word.
EOE97 t1_j010cqf wrote
Reply to comment by DramaticMud1412 in I asked ChatGPT to rewrite the 10 Commandments with Secular values by Augeria
How do you know it will be removed?
EOE97 t1_izwbl9m wrote
Reply to AGI will not precede Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI) - They will arrive simultaneously by __ingeniare__
ASI = AGI + few more days after inception.
EOE97 t1_ixhz91x wrote
Reply to what does this sub think of Elon Musk by [deleted]
Like him or hate him, Elon is no doubt pushing many big industries and changing the narrative.
I've grown to dislike him over the years after all the dumb shit he's been saying/doing, but I wouldn't deny the substantial contribution he made leading various field in the world of technology.
EOE97 t1_iqv21rq wrote
Reply to comment by Lawjarp2 in Large Language Models Can Self-improve by Dr_Singularity
A decade ago and most people wouldn't expect this amount of progress any decade soon. Let them have their hopium.
EOE97 t1_jc63q9r wrote
Reply to Plastic pollution in oceans has reached 'unprecedented' levels in 15 years by ethereal3xp
The biggest source of pollution and danger to marine life comes from nets and the fishing industry. If you consume marine life, you are part of the problem.
Ecosystems at the brink of collapse and business as usual will lead to the entire demise of what we have left. Something's got to change and a shift in our food choices should be one of them.