Groundbreaking_Tank2

Groundbreaking_Tank2 OP t1_iuyrlne wrote

Yeah I have actually never heard of council member deference or "community input" being used for something positive. It's always used for NIMBYism to block bike lanes, bus lanes, housing etc.
The housing shortage affects all New Yorkers so why should one woman have the ability to kill home for thousands of people?

8

Groundbreaking_Tank2 OP t1_iuyqqqu wrote

When vacancies are low, rents go up. When you build more housing, you get more vacancies, and rents go down.

​

No matter how much mental gymnastics you try, you will never get around that fact. Stop being a NIMBY.

https://www.thecity.nyc/2022/9/27/23373855/affordable-housing-crisis-city-council-eric-adams-throgs-neck

13

Groundbreaking_Tank2 OP t1_iuyqi2a wrote

The subsidized units are affordable housing units, not the market-rate units you claim are "gentrifying" the area. Not to mention the developer is building the 25% affordable units on their own dime and providing several other major concessions to the community after receiving feedback.

You're learning the basics of housing in your city, congratulations.

I will now await you moving the goalpost.

5

Groundbreaking_Tank2 OP t1_iuyooqs wrote

/u/Head_Acanthisitta256 you obviously don't know anything about this development. The developer is giving a long list of concessions, it's not getting subsidies. It's the opposite of what you're claiming.

I've noticed NIMBYs never have their facts straight. I wonder why.

9

Groundbreaking_Tank2 t1_isopgaa wrote

The delays on MTA buses these days are maddening. Yesterday I waited for the M9 and then it was announced it would be delayed by 8 minutes so I waited, then it said another 6 minutes, then another 5, then another 9 minutes and overall it would have been faster to walk there with 2 broken legs than take this broken bus.

20