HistoricalBridge7

HistoricalBridge7 t1_j59o4cd wrote

According to the article some of these missing persons “have a history of going missing” - I’m not saying this is right but these cases are different. The Ana Walshe story when first reported was a woman from Cohasset going to work in DC missing her flight and going missing potential due to a ride share. This is extremely relatable to every single middle class woman in MA from towns similar to Cohasset. People like to hear stories where they go “OMG that could have been me”

1

HistoricalBridge7 t1_ixggtma wrote

I’ve seen the saying that some people are lawsuit proof. You can win a million dollar lawsuit against someone but it doesn’t mean you will actually collect a dime. I’ve also heard (would love a personal injury attorney to chime in) that the first thing lawyers do is look people up in Lexis nexus for insurance information along with an asset search. So having good insurance and umbrella insurance will actually increase your chance of a lawsuit. I’d personally still have it because I own my home and have some assets.

1

HistoricalBridge7 t1_ixgfx97 wrote

I’d argue that having an add glass store front where cars can easily drive through makes apple responsible. I understand it looks modern and well designed but of they had a half wall or more support beams maybe the far wouldn’t have been able to kill someone and hurt so many people. I’m not lawyer but that would be my argument. No idea if that would even work.

0

HistoricalBridge7 t1_ixgfoss wrote

The drivers insurance is only responsible for what their policy holder has in coverage and not a penny more. This is why some people carry umbrella insurance. Victims can sue the driver and whoever else might pay, apple, derby street management - it’ll all depend on what you can win in court and someone’s ability to actually pay.

19