ILikeMyGrassBlue

ILikeMyGrassBlue t1_je0mmos wrote

Where are you getting that number from? I don’t see it in the article anywhere.

I’m curious if the difference here is the CA standard vs national standard. CA often has much stricter standards, hence all the “this product is known to cause cancer in the state of CA” warnings you see. Maybe the bars are within the national FDA standard or whatever, but far exceed the CA one .

2

ILikeMyGrassBlue t1_jdwq8mu wrote

Yup. Whenever you see a “don’t do XYZ,” it’s because some did it.

A perfect example of this just happened to a guy I know. He uses these machines at work. He was training a new guy and explicitly said, “there’s no guard here, but make sure your fingers don’t go in. This thing’ll pull them right off.” A few days later, the guy know accidentally got a finger in there and was just barely able to save it. He got incredibly lucky and easily could’ve lost a whole hand. And now they finally decided to pay someone to put guards on those specific machines to prevent it.

25

ILikeMyGrassBlue t1_jddjvoy wrote

The state can’t do jack shit about the license to carry issue. The problem there is with federal law. The best the state can do is say they’re going to ignore it, but you’d still be breaking the law regardless, and the fed could still theoretically come after all those people (though that’s incredibly unlikely).

2

ILikeMyGrassBlue t1_jddji7m wrote

The law in PA is very clear. 1ng/ml of THC in your blood = DUI. Actual impairment is irrelevant to the law because of how it’s written.

https://norml.org/laws/drugged-driving/pennsylvania-drugged-driving/?amp

An SC case wouldn’t go anywhere because that’s the lay of the law, and it’s not conflicting with anything in the state constitution. You’re basically SOL, outside of negotiating a better deal.

Some lawmakers have been trying to fix the DUI law, especially for MMJ card holders, but none of them have passed yet.

3

ILikeMyGrassBlue t1_jdawtnl wrote

They also still make more than non-college graduates on average. An English or comm degree may not be for a specific job like a biologist or engineer or teacher, but it still opens a lot of doors. It’s just not guaranteed for a specific position like a rocket scientist or something is.

3

ILikeMyGrassBlue t1_jdawko4 wrote

Philosophy majors also make more than non-college graduates on average. If I remember correctly, it was even more than welders, which is a classic suggestion for “go to trade school instead.” Not shitting on trades here; college isn’t for everyone. But I love that philosophy is always the degree people shit on lol.

2

ILikeMyGrassBlue t1_jaajd05 wrote

In that case, no. They give you your license at the end of the PA Motorcycle Safety Course, or you can do it through the DMV and do that test. The safety course is free here (or at least was when I did mine), so I’d just do that. Brush up on your skills (never hurts) and it’s frankly easier than the DMV skills test lol.

3

ILikeMyGrassBlue t1_j9zf73i wrote

I’ve never gone blind from liquor, so they’re clearly pretty capable when it comes to regulating the safety of products.

Drugs need to regulated. People have the right know that the products they’re buying are as safe as possible and are as advertised. No one should have to worry about fent being in THC gummies.

14

ILikeMyGrassBlue t1_j9pwgkr wrote

This is basically true for most of them, depending on how you define album. If you include live stuff, outtakes, and demos, most artists of that caliber and longevity have a shit ton of stuff. A lot of it is usually underwhelming though, like the 937 versions of Red House that the Hendrix Estate has released.

2

ILikeMyGrassBlue t1_j9pu3bo wrote

They do it legally, for the most part. Bribery of politicians is basically legal in the US, if you go through the right channels. You have to be astoundingly stupid to commit a campaign finance violation. There’s literally a legal way to do it, which is why most politicians/rich fucks don’t get caught for it—they do it legally. Just goes to show how dumb this guy is.

60

ILikeMyGrassBlue t1_j9c8zxu wrote

A few things for context:

  1. This is a private school.

  2. The curriculum sounds relatively similar to stuff that’s taught in health classes (other than the masturbation videos).

  3. It was only shown to 11th and 12th graders, who let’s be real, have likely already seen porn.

  4. The whole thing is optional, requiring a parental waiver.

80