The cobblestones of course! 🤔

sounds passive-aggressive to me

But not for me!

reminds me of Britta from Community lol

"I can excuse murdering 3/4 of the population of humanity, but I draw the line at forced sterilization!"

it was pretty fucking dark from the beginning what OP posted

So instead you just want to let a computer, programmed by humans, decide which billions of humans to kill, to get down to an arbitrary number that you pulled out of your ass. Okay, fucking fascist.

Keep this fascist bs in the burning dumpster where it belongs. The problem is not overpopulation, it's efficiently using and allocating the resources available, instead of allowing a privileged few to hoard and waste them, and manipulate essential resources like food, water, and housing, as commodities.

Yeah i try not to go to user history first, but once I saw it that sealed it for me.

In any case, i was already pretty sure. most people have characteristic mannerisms in their writing, even if they're being very dry and formal there will be something, and chatgpt has none. it's statistically driven to the most generic possible response. Becomes pretty easy to spot once you get used to it.

I'm starting to get used to the dry yet accessible writing style of chatgpt as well as its paragraph length and conclusion paragraphs. on top of that, compare the original post to the writing style of the op's other comments, and I think you might very well be right.

also a lot of the op's recent activity is on chatgpt and bing subs.

nah he just runs real fast or drives in his IROC

https://chat.openai.com/

> when i tell it its wrong it just doubles down because it does not understand fact vs opinion it just gives you the most relevant data it has and says "that's the answer you want"

In my experience, it apologizes for the mistake, and then when you ask to update (rewrite) the product incorporating the new information, it's even odds whether it will make the desired change, ignore it completely, or make a new different mistake.

yes exactly what I was thinking of.

the heritage foundation misrepresenting data in bad faith to convey a reactionary message? I'm shocked! /s

How good is the cell signal in there?

if next door is against it that's even more proof we need it

Yeah i got a survey recently about plans to build light rail along the 45 corridor which would be perfect for me.

Yeah i mean it's already been 20 years...

"Adopted 2002"? So that yellow line is somewhat committed to eventually being built? Yay

Packed with broken leaf peepers on a last chance scenic drive?