Why not? What's wrong with using a cheap, effective and highly proven material? They could likely purchase them easily.

What the fuck is PC load letter!?

The thing is, we're putting cover sheets on all our TPS reports now. I'll go ahead and make sure you get another copy of the memo.

No, both are true and aren't mutually exclusive. Thanks for playing, bye.

Yes, compatible ones that their armed forces are trained to operate and they have supply lines and servicing capability for.

That is categorically not NATO ones, but T- model tanks from other Eastern Bloc nations.

Western tanks are of absolutely no use to them for countless logistical reasons, which is why they aren't being requested or offered by NATO nations.

They don't really need or want tanks, though. For the kind of fighting that's happening in Ukraine, they're mostly death traps.

What's more, US-built tanks aren't usable, they would need months to years of training and infrastructure for maintenance and servicing.

Besides, Russia has abandoned far more empty tanks than Ukraine has lost and they're Soviet models that Ukraine utilises anyway.

What they really need is longer range artillery and rockets, anti air defence systems and so on, which is what they're being given.

🤔😂

A flat pack wardrobe can fit in the trunk of a car, but once it's unpacked it would be far bigger.

Files work the same, sometimes!