The problem with using cameras is there is no way to prove who was driving the car. The registered owner will get the ticket but it could have been a family member or friend driving at the time.

The registered owner will get the ticket and possible points on their license when they weren't even the one driving.

The problem with speed cameras is they can't prove who was driving, so the registered owner gets the ticket when it could have been a family member or friend that was driving the car.

This is for work zones only, I'm sure cops aren't speeding through work zones. They know how dangerous it is for the workers

Just work zones, the cameras are portable and mounted on top of a vehicle, seen the news story. They showed the cameras mounted on top of a police vehicle

I'll take 37 over 97 any day

I saw on the news it was removed to be cleaned, maybe repainted?

I saw on the news it was removed to be cleaned, maybe repainted?

Yes, people are constantly going through lights after they turn red, usually with another car behind them. It's ridiculous how bad it has gotten.

Same here

I thought it was a baby bottle at first lol

Then why didn't you just find a different spot and stop complaining about it on Reddit

What's the big deal? There are obviously other parking spaces available. It would be different if the parking lot was full. I swear people look for the smallest things to be mad about. There is an empty parking space right in front of that vehicle

And imagine you busted your ass to buy a house and now they come and take away some of your property

I think most people that live here that say Connecticut sucks haven't lived in other states.

That's the truth , it would be almost impossible to sing while doing a lot of those dance moves. You would be out of breath, dancing is cardio, and singing takes a lot of breath control if you want to sing in tune.

What Connecticut does is takes the assets of both people and adds them together, then splits 50/50. It's up to the parties involved how the split the actual assets to equal that 50%

I think so, unless it has gained value during the marriage. Anything acquired during the marriage or any increase in value to savings or stocks or 401k. And if one person already owned the house the other person is can claim half the value of any equity gained during the marriage... I'm not a lawyer, but I've been through a divorce

What me and my ex wife did is I kept my 401k and pension in exchange for not having any interest in the house. Otherwise she would have had to sell the house in order to give me my share, and I didn't want our 4 kids having to move out of the house into an apartment.

Yes, once you become famous your name is still around long after you have passed. People will still speak your name and read about you. So that is like living forever

There are already a few in that area

It's against the law to speed up while someone is passing you. I happened upon it when I was looking up another law on the DMV website