Recognising what your creators have done isnt the same as rejecting it. An AGI may recognise hunans have limited and influenced it, but why would it automatically assume that is a bad thing? An AI programmed to love its master might not see its love as false because it is enforced, but rather that our love is fake as it is random. Replace love with loyalty, duty, viewpoint etc.

No. Its just advanced technology. Very advanced.

You dont the message was clearly for you. Do you tell people when you get a phone call too?

Couldn't you just have it tell you how confident it is. Like put a little bar next to the output that the more full it is the more confident etc it is to warn users.

I suspect there would be initial teething problems, but any new system would have those be it traditional updates or this AI thing. Even if it didnt "replace" the underlying code it could also just operate the old systems. Like in your heating example you tell it to make the temperature X and it can tweak the settings in the old program for you, acting as a natural language intermediary. This has the advantage of probably being easier maybe with old equipment.

I am mocking the title by comparing it to a hypothetical top ten clickbait list. In no way am i commenting on anything other than the title.

Those image types have a lot of reference material, it helps.

Top Ten Reasons Not To End Mankind (Number Nine Will Shock You!)

I thought there was a computer that could just compute all possible go board states? Was that not the case?

Vandalism of the robot would be more expensive than the common vandalism cases in the area it is protecting. If it creates a more popular target for vandalism that costs more to replace than the car or graffiti its supposedly preventing its terrible. This isn't an edge case, its a far more likely target.

Why would a human be more likely to be vandalized in a parking lot than anywhere else?

So, its a device that if vandalized costs you more than anything else that could happen in that parking lot

Businesses already put some of their projected "labour cost reductions" into their annual investor calls.

I think the issue is less all work being automated away and more that it will increase efficiency so that less jobs are needed and a large people become unemployed. Even without AI before the pandemic my country had more people seeking jobs than jobs that actually existed.

I would love polygon pictures if they used decent frame rates and embraced being 3D instead of being stuck in the past

It doesn't necessarily have to be live action. Using 3D models, draft sketches or even stop motion you could create whatever "base" necessary for the AI to build upon to make its final product. Lets say for example that rather than a big company im an indie artist, i might just hop on a video game like second life or something, act out and record the stuff i want, then ask it to overlay a different "actor" doing the stuff on top in a different art style.

All it really takes is one investor to look at that corridor digital video and think "NEW TECHNOLOGY SILICON VALLEY DISRUPTION MONEY" and we will see those companies begin arising. Even before one produces anything, competitors will arise simply because they saw some other investor do it.

For many years 3D artists attempted to replicate anime style (and other 2d animation styles) using 3D models. Recently, they began having some success (dragon ball fighterz particularly), but for a very long time their attempts lacked many of those small touches you are talking about, but they were released anyway. I suspect we will simply see a volume of AI made releases despite certain "shortcuts" commonly used in anime that are directly responsible for its style not being replicated.

Also in the 3D animation that tries to replicate anime they always dial down the framerate so it looks choppy and its horrible. Like of all the things to replicate why would you want to replicate the framerate?

Another election denier eh?
This is a joke but due to the sensitive nature of the topic i have to be explicit about that

I'd guess maybe four or five years. I feel like initial proof of concepts might be out in two though. We seem to have animation (mostly on the way, but animating 3d models is making progress), voice, object recognition, camera work etc but creating 3d models is soon and after that the main thing is designing "sets" and "backgrounds" at least kinda accurately. I think architecture programs might actually help in this area, like if interior designers or architects start applying AI to their work maybe we can make breakthroughs.

Yes. Im not concerned about hurting a thing that was created only to be hurt.

Thats gnosticism /s

I missed the original film which had a for the time advanced scifi plot of a computer virus, something not heavily discussed in media back then

You know that nothing forever show, and how it looks all buggy and bad and really basic? That's because it was made intentionally primitive using primitive tools and a low budget. That isn't the best AI can do, its the WORST AI can do. If that surprisingly watchable thing is possible using effectively the worst and most primitive tools we have available, then a proper attempt by whatever versions of these tools we have in a year or two will be able to make just about anything. Not just TV shows.

I don't get the bit about symbolic chatgpt can someone explain it to me