Introduce them to your fiance, and apologize again. Maybe it will help, maybe it won't, maybe she was pressing you because she thought it was funny.

That's like the 4th time in a decade

So... they left it sealed right? They didn't move the nails and line and bricks?

Write your name and number down and slip it in her stuff. You introduced yourself, didn't come.off as pushy, and you can leave the ball in her court, and go about your normal day.

This. Imagine scanning a site and handing your client a pair of goggles as you walk around they can see 3d overlays of the plans and you can adjust or make changes in real time to set the blueprints. Then as it is being built the ar glasses project the blueprints and lengths or angles directly on materials in real time.

No... he is correct you can MOVE 5 times the amount of heat with the same energy it takes to MAKE 1 unit of heat.

You could mention that 42 in computing code is an asterisk, which would imply that one has to make one's own meaning, that life itself.os meaningless, but to build meaningful relationships is the purpose of life.

My condolences, he sounds great.

"Omnes en tempore"

A title to a fictional song in a story I am writing.

Ready in 20 minutes or less?

Boneworks was good and blade and sorcerybis fun... but forever incomplete.

How much stress can slaying thousands of people really be worked out before you develop unhealthy complex

This system would allow the efficient rejection of heat into space day and night, the aerosolized particles will only cover day side. These aerosol particles will also fall and need to be replaced, they will also effect life on earth as life on earth Injests them. We watch cancer rates raise daily as it is.

You asked for proof and I provided at least two videos on how what I was talking about was possible.

https://youtu.be/pq8xDXkbXZs

Explains exactly what I was talking about for transferring the heat, but I want to make aerogel or the metal the vantawhite color using harmonic resonance to make the nano texture.

I am done arguing.

Did you watch any of the fournlinks to videos or radiant heat I edited in? This is the first you should watch and the best describing the phenomenon.

https://youtu.be/pq8xDXkbXZs

So the panel is constantly editing infra red light or heat. It is colder than what's around it because it is better at making that light so it absorbes vibrating heat around it and organizes it into the waveform that best escapes. So we make refrigeration loops, that collect heat from the deep water, then organize and concentrate that heat expelling it Into the cold panels (heat exchanger) that emit the light.

I'm not crazy this stuff already exists.

Is my point t made?

https://youtu.be/O8XMi6Q-oW0

Oh the original video I was looking for an embarassment of riches!

https://youtu.be/pq8xDXkbXZs

Fine I'll use vanta white paint to reflect 99.99% of light on the condenser unit and make it out of marble which is below ambient temp anyways,

I know you also agree. Couldn't find the other video that explained how the radiant infrared panels... already exist. This one mentions them, and other power free cooling with aero gel.

https://youtu.be/oLt-X13CgQc

Here is a short one on the panels existing ... 9 years old.

https://youtu.be/O8XMi6Q-oW0

And another!

https://youtu.be/N3bJnKmeNJY

Hey its like this Info is easily available!

https://youtu.be/WSTNLvvD_-U

So... imagine a nano texture. The light it gives off Is the wavelengths of visible light let's say green. The texture is such that light reflected from it is the wavelength of the texture of the surface. The nano texture is shaped to bounce off 620 NM or deep red. Now we are going to change the texture and therefore the color. We space out the texture to the I frame red wavelength above 780 NM.

You were talking about emitting light, but it is already infra red light emitting from hot objects such as a condenser panel shedding heat. The idea I'd to shed heat to a synch that emits the light at that frequency that best escapes.

How do we controll nano texture?

Soundwave. Place sand on a amplifier and tune it to the right frequency and you can co troll the shape of the sand on top.

We are going smaller. We have to use a different gas mixture than air, and use harmonic resonance to make the particles in the top of a rapidly cooling metal "dance" Into self organized resonant patterns like the sand. We have to "tune" the resonance to the correct infra red "color" the cooling substance keeps this surface texture.

When we shine light through colored glass the light coming out the end matches the light of the glass. Infra red heat light will naturally expell through the texture at the correct wavelength like the light through the filter. Just as built up infra red heat builds up and expresses as actual visible light in "red hot" materials, so too does the nano textured material shine the infra red "color" brightly. The wavelengths vibrate most optimally through the atmosphere up into space.

We target the heat in the oceans because that water has already collected many joules of heat, and the heat transmission through water is much more efficient than through the air. We will likely push some of that heat Into the ambient air, but the main goal is to penetrate the atmosphere without exiting it more.

Nano textured materials. It has to be the right "color" NM infra red, then it will expell heat at the wavelength frequency that best escapes the absorbtion spectrum.

If you are aware of heat pumps having efficiency over 1, then you know that while the sunlight would be able to heat 1 unit per calorie, if we could move 50 calories with the 1 unit of power.

The same 1 unit of power moving heat more efficiently means we don't have to alter our light spectrum or jeopardize our atmosphere. We are trying to get nature to do something it ALREADY wants to do, like pushing a ball downhill or getting cold water to sink.

If we oxygenate the dead zones we can u do so.eof the damage already caused to our ecosystem. If we make it so plankton breeds better, and stabilize plankton ecosystems, they will process more co2 out of the atmosphere, if we have more plankton we can use curre t dead zones escapes to expand mariculture and feed people... the synergistic benefits make it a better option than blocking our own life giving sun.

By using the heat conductive properties of water I will pull heat out of the oceans and beam it into space. This may not be as efficient but it doesn't require changing our atmospheric chemistry and change the energy that supports the bottom of our food chain.

It takes a certain amount of energy to create.heat, the amount of energy it takes to MOVE that heat is a fraction of that, and depending on how you collect and reject energy you can get efficiency better than 1.

This means we could COOL the oceans with a tiny fraction of the energy it took to HEAT it to the same degree.

I am already having this argument with other redditors so forgive my exhaustion on the subject.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/105rqkt/the_pacific_oceans_oxygenstarved_omz_is_growing/j3rmi3r?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3

You oversimplify. We can reject heat at a more efficient rate by aiming for the absorption gap in the infra red spectrum. Heat at that frequency best escapes earth, moving heat in this manner can give us better efficiency.

We can use the solar radiation and expel heat more efficiently. We should not block out life giving sun light

No! There are other better ways! We need solar radiation for life on earth its the HEAT we have a problem with

One; that was not the previous discussion between myself and the other fellow.

Two; isolated cities in caped craters or tented canyons would totally give us room to make habitable for scientists workers and tourists.

Three: your first sentence is a little jumbled, Not unless we don't want to stay human- is what I think you may have meant.

Four: we cannot easily predict where ai assisted science will do for us. Maybe we will find a way to live on mars with better medicines involving new proteins and enzymes folded by nano-materials thought of by very powerful machines.

So... dome cities on a planet with tiny atmospheric pressure and lower gravity= unrealistic, ridiculous, outlandish, too hard

Planetcracking Mars to manufacture habitable microplanets in space= realistic, practical, straightforward, easy project...

I do not think your point is clarified. We will need to go to Mars at some point. The size of the colony doesn't matter. We have to colonize mars as a stepping stone to go farther. We may eventually do what you are saying. But that would be after the easier projects.

So a group of workers sent to a distant land to exploit its resources... a robot COLONY

And if Mars sucks... THEN we blow it up for lootz