ThetaGangThroweway

ThetaGangThroweway OP t1_j6lrxhh wrote

You underestimate the Fed's power, and the brutality of men. Not only will there being NOTHING else to invest in, but given the circumstances you could face legal or extralegal consequences for not participating in the war effort. In fact, it is unlikely you will be investing at all, but buying gear in order to participate. I don't know who you are, but it doesn't matter, you're going to get involved.

1

ThetaGangThroweway OP t1_j6k8y6v wrote

Come on. Americans complain about government debt no matter what it is. Out here in Kansas we complain about Topeka's use of money markets, which are overnight loans for when taxes and payroll don't match up. The Federal debt is the rough equivalent to a mortgage.

But more importantly, rising interest rates effect future debts and not current ones. If a company has a fixed rate mortgage for 7%, they will keep paying that no matter what the Fed does (although refinancing will be impossible).

And why the frick would people dump the dollar? It's such a cliche to predict its collapse that you said it with no logical connection to the topic at hand. The US government does all business in US dollars, meaning the more the government takes over the more the more people HAVE to use dollars.

1

ThetaGangThroweway OP t1_j6jdbt5 wrote

Dude, it was easy to spot by what you thought "modern war" was like. What I say plagues even the Pentagon where most commanders assume the last big war plus recent tech trends equal "modern war." Also, most army commanders don't know a thing about strategic theory.

But an interesting point is that nuclear deterrence prevents major formalized governments from seeking conventional war, but there are many states that could breakup or spontaneously unify at any moment. There are also many points in history where large rogue armies sprung up overnight, and internal wars in countries where the conventional forces are either unable or unwilling to act, and extended periods when governments were defunct. You should not think all war is confined to conventional arms or insurrectionists.

1

ThetaGangThroweway OP t1_j6gt9q7 wrote

Dude, you're falling into the classic trap that the last decades of fights are "the future of war. " This simply isn't so.

But a key factor of any war that is that no one has any idea what they're doing. Not you, not me, not the politicians, not the commanders, not the grunts, not the drill sergeants, not the enemy, not anyone. Any major war effort is a chaotic mess that gets better as people fix stuff, then the war ends and everyone forgets about it.

1

ThetaGangThroweway OP t1_j6esepi wrote

Yes, but you vastly underestimate how much money can be raised through taxes. Interest rates can be raised to get funding NOW, while increased tax revenue takes months or years to catch up (sort of like Uncle Sam's credit card).

And no, high interest rates tank the stock market, but profitable employment will still exist. Companies that are profitable NOW will continue to be profitable and grow naturally, but companies that seek rapid growth better have some in-demand service to provide immediately.

4