Think_Olive_1000

Think_Olive_1000 t1_j3tqojo wrote

Nah, there's already work that can reduce generic LLM model size by a half and not lose any performance. And LLMs I think will be great as foundation models for training more niche smaller models for narrower tasks - people already use openAIs API to generate data to fine-tune their own niche models. I think we'll look back at current LLMs and realise just how inefficient they were - though a necessary evil to prove that something like this CAN be done.

1

Think_Olive_1000 t1_j349ak4 wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Moore's Law and AI by [deleted]

Unlike those mere meddlers in misophonia inducing dribble I have a fist around actual physics and the universal laws it describes therein. Ask me of the classical and I will speak of Euler and Lagrange, of the modern and I will speak with you in terms and diagrams Feynman. Ask me of the classical regime as we asymptomatically approach the speed of light and I will echo Einstein and Ricci. For in every vector, matrix and tensor therein speaks a compact notation that a thousand thousand new age hippies could not grasp.

0

Think_Olive_1000 t1_j348jjk wrote

Reply to comment by PieMediocre872 in Moore's Law and AI by [deleted]

It's all about the sweat of the mule. If you can acquire the musk and scent of a weary, spent and perilously close to death mule - then you have a fighting chance in this dogged world. Until such a time sit in quiet reverence for the holy. Take upon your spirit the art of the lettered. The most well lettered of the world hold the keys to extinction and salvation both and we are but at their whim.

0

Think_Olive_1000 t1_j347z22 wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in Moore's Law and AI by [deleted]

You think I'm bound by a vocabulary of a mere 17000 entries in a database? No, I assure you that anything here confabulated is closer to hapax legomenon than anything spouted by a mere metal monstrosity.

−2

Think_Olive_1000 t1_j346lxd wrote

Reply to comment by PieMediocre872 in Moore's Law and AI by [deleted]

I haven't tried hard at anything since the last time I tried and popped your mother's prolapsed anus back into its fissured and disfigured gaping hole with my iron thick rod. And even that was easier than you trying to rub your two brain cells together trying to formulate a response that didn't reek of jealousy. You ought not think you will not be caught dear boy. Your lack of real world hardiness will shine in a world where chatgpt will bolster the hard working and diminish the stature yet further of the lazy and rapturous folk such as yourself.

1

Think_Olive_1000 t1_j344brf wrote

Reply to comment by PieMediocre872 in Moore's Law and AI by [deleted]

Well dear chap the real qualm you ought have is not with my circumlocution but rather that disaptitude is not a real word - ineptitude abounds on this subreddit. By the way, Moore probably had a better grasp of the English tongue than any of you one trick GPT powered ponies. Honestly, my time to flex the deltoid of my lascivious tongue upon a gaping and prolapsed tender anus has come. I dare any of you halfwit mongrels to generate speech as eloquent and grandiloquent with as many tangents and out of distribution ponderings as I.

1

Think_Olive_1000 t1_j33ro68 wrote

Put it this way: Moore probably had no idea what twerking was. Now, given this lack of foresightedness what else can we say about his characteristic disaptitude for clairvoyance?

2

Think_Olive_1000 t1_j328kga wrote

your ability to use google maps effectively correlates pretty well with how well you understand paper maps. things like logitude, latitude, being able to read the legend, being able to understand what contour lines mean. If we teach students to be lazy and not understand these things then they won't even know how to prompt an ai effectively into doing what they want. Not to mention they'd be left completely helpless in situations where being able to read a map is vital - like if they're abroad and they have no internet access (offline map only, no guidance), which is not uncommon. Ofcourse, you might never encounter that situation if you're a lardy american.

1

Think_Olive_1000 t1_j29bca8 wrote

They've cut the number of requests you can make an hour, addresses the cost issue somewhat. I think they can plug the hole made by unexpected influx with their marketing budget. It's gotta be one of the most succesfull tech product launches of all time with number of unique and new users reaching the million mark within a week of going live.

12