Think_Olive_1000
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j3tqojo wrote
Reply to comment by suflaj in [D] Will NLP Researchers Lose Our Jobs after ChatGPT? by singularpanda
Nah, there's already work that can reduce generic LLM model size by a half and not lose any performance. And LLMs I think will be great as foundation models for training more niche smaller models for narrower tasks - people already use openAIs API to generate data to fine-tune their own niche models. I think we'll look back at current LLMs and realise just how inefficient they were - though a necessary evil to prove that something like this CAN be done.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j3toxf1 wrote
Reply to comment by suflaj in [D] Will NLP Researchers Lose Our Jobs after ChatGPT? by singularpanda
I think they meant: it is conceivable that in the future it could. i.e. you hook an LLM up with a repl. https://youtu.be/pdSfgRYy8Ao take at look at 15 minutes in. I could easily see how you could fine tune using self appraisal by executing code.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j3tnqyd wrote
Reply to comment by singularpanda in [D] Will NLP Researchers Lose Our Jobs after ChatGPT? by singularpanda
I feel like you'd make a really bad research student
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j3tnkld wrote
Reply to comment by singularpanda in [D] Will NLP Researchers Lose Our Jobs after ChatGPT? by singularpanda
Dude that's why you ought to put everything into NLP find a way of producing better results for cheaper on less expensive hardware and you'll be the talk of the town. I think everyone would love to have an unrestricted local version of chatgpt on their phones. Do the research!
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j3tmuvt wrote
Reply to comment by Eastern_Care_6369 in [P] I built Adrenaline, a debugger that fixes errors and explains them with GPT-3 by jsonathan
Why the fuck are you coding on an iPhone - if you're going to use a phone at least be android
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j3qynuz wrote
Reply to comment by fredlafrite in [D] Have you ever used Knowledge Distillation in practice? by fredlafrite
Neural magic does work in this space, not sure about KD specifically
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j349ak4 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Moore's Law and AI by [deleted]
Unlike those mere meddlers in misophonia inducing dribble I have a fist around actual physics and the universal laws it describes therein. Ask me of the classical and I will speak of Euler and Lagrange, of the modern and I will speak with you in terms and diagrams Feynman. Ask me of the classical regime as we asymptomatically approach the speed of light and I will echo Einstein and Ricci. For in every vector, matrix and tensor therein speaks a compact notation that a thousand thousand new age hippies could not grasp.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j348jjk wrote
Reply to comment by PieMediocre872 in Moore's Law and AI by [deleted]
It's all about the sweat of the mule. If you can acquire the musk and scent of a weary, spent and perilously close to death mule - then you have a fighting chance in this dogged world. Until such a time sit in quiet reverence for the holy. Take upon your spirit the art of the lettered. The most well lettered of the world hold the keys to extinction and salvation both and we are but at their whim.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j347z22 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Moore's Law and AI by [deleted]
You think I'm bound by a vocabulary of a mere 17000 entries in a database? No, I assure you that anything here confabulated is closer to hapax legomenon than anything spouted by a mere metal monstrosity.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j346lxd wrote
Reply to comment by PieMediocre872 in Moore's Law and AI by [deleted]
I haven't tried hard at anything since the last time I tried and popped your mother's prolapsed anus back into its fissured and disfigured gaping hole with my iron thick rod. And even that was easier than you trying to rub your two brain cells together trying to formulate a response that didn't reek of jealousy. You ought not think you will not be caught dear boy. Your lack of real world hardiness will shine in a world where chatgpt will bolster the hard working and diminish the stature yet further of the lazy and rapturous folk such as yourself.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j344brf wrote
Reply to comment by PieMediocre872 in Moore's Law and AI by [deleted]
Well dear chap the real qualm you ought have is not with my circumlocution but rather that disaptitude is not a real word - ineptitude abounds on this subreddit. By the way, Moore probably had a better grasp of the English tongue than any of you one trick GPT powered ponies. Honestly, my time to flex the deltoid of my lascivious tongue upon a gaping and prolapsed tender anus has come. I dare any of you halfwit mongrels to generate speech as eloquent and grandiloquent with as many tangents and out of distribution ponderings as I.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j33ro68 wrote
Reply to Moore's Law and AI by [deleted]
Put it this way: Moore probably had no idea what twerking was. Now, given this lack of foresightedness what else can we say about his characteristic disaptitude for clairvoyance?
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j328r5j wrote
Reply to comment by dasnihil in 2022 was the year AGI arrived (Just don't call it that) by sideways
AI
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j328kga wrote
Reply to comment by VirtualEndlessWill in NYC Bans Students and Teachers from Using ChatGPT by blueSGL
your ability to use google maps effectively correlates pretty well with how well you understand paper maps. things like logitude, latitude, being able to read the legend, being able to understand what contour lines mean. If we teach students to be lazy and not understand these things then they won't even know how to prompt an ai effectively into doing what they want. Not to mention they'd be left completely helpless in situations where being able to read a map is vital - like if they're abroad and they have no internet access (offline map only, no guidance), which is not uncommon. Ofcourse, you might never encounter that situation if you're a lardy american.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j310ybl wrote
Reply to comment by TheRidgeAndTheLadder in 2022 was the year AGI arrived (Just don't call it that) by sideways
Depends how successful you did act after your didactics and did you land the acrobatics?
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j310sbm wrote
Reply to comment by Ortus14 in NYC Bans Students and Teachers from Using ChatGPT by blueSGL
Isn't the ban partially because they don't want students to miss out on actually doing the work themselves? Using AI is kinda like going to the gym and then getting hal9000 to lift 90% of any weight you're told to pick up.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j310ojz wrote
Reply to comment by voyaging in NYC Bans Students and Teachers from Using ChatGPT by blueSGL
None - the only difference is that it is one on one so it feels like that to the user. Education in a lot of places is broken because of class size.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j2t8rie wrote
Reply to [R] Do we really need 300 floats to represent the meaning of a word? Representing words with words - a logical approach to word embedding using a self-supervised Tsetlin Machine Autoencoder. by olegranmo
Surprised no one embeds it like CLIP but for word definition pairs rather than word image. I'm thinking take word2vec as starting point.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j2exh5p wrote
Reply to comment by GlitteringBroccoli12 in Happy New Year Everyone. It's time to accelerate even more 🤠by Pro_RazE
BCIs are cool but not gonna cut my skull up for it, no thanks
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j2cjj4c wrote
Reply to comment by modestLife1 in When is GPT4 expected to release? by [deleted]
Holy shit I think gpt4 will drastically reduce mean jerk time and maximize DAAT (dicks at a time) - how didn't these guys see that an LLM was the solution to all their woes https://youtu.be/P-hUV9yhqgY
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j29bca8 wrote
Reply to comment by Kaarssteun in OpenAI might have shot themselves in the foot with ChatGPT by Kaarssteun
They've cut the number of requests you can make an hour, addresses the cost issue somewhat. I think they can plug the hole made by unexpected influx with their marketing budget. It's gotta be one of the most succesfull tech product launches of all time with number of unique and new users reaching the million mark within a week of going live.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j28dzcd wrote
Reply to comment by Ryenmaru in Potentiality and Capabilities of Chat GPT has been reduced by TXEA_69
It won't even write my university assignments now. I'm not joking. Even this very benign thing it's like "I cannot write a report". And yes I've tried getting around it but it refuses. I thought I was quite good at prompt engineering but this is just pure stubbornness that they've built in.
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j1qpey9 wrote
Reply to comment by bittytoy in I finished writing and designing a Children Story Book with Chat GPT and Stable Diffusion in Less than 6 Hours by sdas11111
Sigma dad moment
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j1nhniu wrote
Reply to Will ChatGPT Replace Google? by SupPandaHugger
Nah
Think_Olive_1000 t1_j3u3k7w wrote
Reply to comment by suflaj in [D] Will NLP Researchers Lose Our Jobs after ChatGPT? by singularpanda
Bert is being used by Google for search under the hood. It's how theyve got that instant fancy extractive answers box. I don't disagree that LLMs are large. So was Saturn V.