Of course they can. People don't just magically make a similar AI, they need to know the details of the model. If it is different enough from what is being published they can for sure keep it secret.

An organization could just pump ou products designed by AI, solutions made by AI, algorithms found by AI, etc, etc, and pretend it was made by people, they don't even need to disclose they are pumping out AI generated products and solutions.

I would be happy if you could link a source for the proportion because I am interested. Not that I don't believe you I just really want to know and I couldn't find it googling. I was under the impression cells can be cultivated and grown in a lab.

Notwithstanding there are already multiple startups claiming to be working on serum-free lab grown meat. Seems like this problem may be solved if we keep financing research on it.

Many industrialized foods are artificially enriched I don't see why vegetarian meat couldn't be. And even if it wasn't, purchasing B12 supplements and ingesting them is not more trouble than purchasing meat, cooking and ingesting it, unless you raise cows to eat in your property yourself.

And even if this was lab grown meat, the problem tou brought up with only means it isn't 100% better but the proportion isn't killing one calf to yield the same as one cow.

How is that related? This video isn't lab grown meat, it is "beyond meat" on a printer.

Are you a chat bot? What's the weather forecast for NYC tomorrow

Sign up for stock image websites which have banned AI generated images and send AI generated pictures to be sold pretending they are not AI generated, they will never know and they deserve it for trying to ban the unbannable.

Calm down, even text-to-text can't come close to writing a long story coherently as of today. Honestly AI storylines get lost in just two or three paragraphs. It is not just about audio and video, the story is the most important thing about a movie.

Which means we still have to see book writers complaining about AI generated books before we get to see movie directors doing the same.

Hot take but I think consciousness will never be explained with physics "from this world". It probably lies in a higher plane that we can neither observe nor manipulate because we are inherently limited, not by our intelligence or technology but by our universe itself.

Which means I believe making synthetic consciousness is impossible and our AIs will never be conscious like we are, but nevertheless will be able to solve mathematical and technological problems much harder than humans can.

But I also believe there is a chance we may stumble into something which may let consciousness "slip in" from the higher plane like a one-directional passage (we still don't understand what is on the other side and can't interact with it but some of the contents leak to this side via holes we poke on purpose).

If we had infinite computational power random evolution would probably be good enough to create things smarter than us. Unfortunately I believe we have to find something more focused

Who guarantees one actual AGI or ASI wouldn't figure out physics interactions that we are not aware about in our theories and then connect itself to the internet without cables or standard wireless adapters? If it is trained with text /audio/video that will show to it what the internet is and the TCP/IP/HTTP/SSH/FTP/UDP protocols then maybe it could set it as an objective to be connected and use "new" physics (new for us) to transform some other component into a wireless adapter and then bam, it is connected to the internet even if we "airlock" it and believe it can't.

Of course, with text to 3D model + 3D printers you can have your house all decorated with exclusive original stuff no one else has