TimeZarg
TimeZarg t1_j3w5bjf wrote
Reply to comment by 0ssamaak0 in Probability I'm asleep at a given time of the day [OC] by 0ssamaak0
Gotta stay strong, fight off the siren call of naptime.
TimeZarg t1_j3w55nd wrote
Reply to comment by insufferablyaverage in Probability I'm asleep at a given time of the day [OC] by 0ssamaak0
I operate on a similar schedule, I usually fall asleep by 1pm (I stay up a bit later if I don't work that night) and wake up at 9pm to go to work at 10:30pm. My shift times are consistent, at least, so I can at least follow some kind of schedule.
TimeZarg t1_j3w4648 wrote
Reply to comment by EatsRats in California's Current Snowpack Water Content vs Historical Levels [OC] by EngagingData
On top of that, because of the drought we've been depleting groundwater at an even faster rate, and that takes much longer to replenish. So, during the next inevitable drought in the next 10 years or so we're not gonna have as much groundwater to fall back on.
We are, quite simply, using too much of a shrinking resource, and not enough is being done to deal with the problem. We needed to put the screws to the big agribusinesses years ago, that's where all the damned water's going.
TimeZarg t1_j3w3ikg wrote
Reply to comment by SiFasEst in [OC] Mr. Buffett - The Older The Wealthier by LeverageShares
In 1960, it would be 10 million equivalent.
TimeZarg t1_j3w2vne wrote
Reply to comment by DividedContinuity in [OC] Mr. Buffett - The Older The Wealthier by LeverageShares
Late 1956 to 1960. Benefited heavily from the Post-war boom I suspect, once you're hitting those kinds of numbers during that time it becomes harder to 'fail' because unless you massively fuck up on a big, risky venture the money can basically grow itself through stable, safe, lower-return investments.
TimeZarg t1_j3w1mmx wrote
Reply to comment by EatsRats in California's Current Snowpack Water Content vs Historical Levels [OC] by EngagingData
This, we'd need at least a couple years of less-scorching summers with rainy winters before a real dent could be made in the drought, it's hard to overstate how dry and depleted the state is, even after being clobbered by weeks of rain and snow we're still gonna have water problems.
TimeZarg t1_j3w0mh7 wrote
Reply to comment by insufferablyaverage in California's Current Snowpack Water Content vs Historical Levels [OC] by EngagingData
It's ultimately a temporary reprieve that'll help with water supply for this year and maybe a ripple effect into next year depending on how much melts. The issue is prolonged drought plus overconsumption of water resources has depleted the 'stockpile' of snowpack that usually accumulates year over year, as well as the groundwater reserves. What the state needs is at least several winters with rain/snowfall like what we're getting this winter.
TimeZarg t1_j3w050t wrote
Reply to comment by longtimefanhim in California's Current Snowpack Water Content vs Historical Levels [OC] by EngagingData
Well, they are in the live site version, I guess they removed it before saving the image.
TimeZarg t1_j3vztds wrote
Reply to comment by EngagingData in California's Current Snowpack Water Content vs Historical Levels [OC] by EngagingData
Holy hell, 2" of growth in a day and this weather's not gonna let up for another week, to say nothing of possible rain over the next three months. Jeez.
TimeZarg t1_je5yiko wrote
Reply to comment by FutureImminent in Russia Says Ukraine Using Long-Range US Artillery by TallAd3975
Sounds like projection on their part. Using 15% and selling the rest is exactly what I would expect Russian military personnel to try getting away with.