Ignore this /u/maskedpaki guy he has literally no idea what hes talking about:

>You mean the 1 week long training I did to be a security guard? You have some weird idealised version of what a security guard is.

> Cameras are hung on high ceilings. They are often hard to see from and have blindspots.

We are talking about the robot.

>Vandalising something with cameras sensors that can send an immediate distress signal is a very bad idea.

This one, the one you said has cameras.

> lol my credentials ? You mean the 1 week long training I did to be a security guard? You have some weird idealised version of what a security guard is.

I rest my case.

> humans are mostly standing on the ground in most crime scenes.

So now you remember the cameras are on the robot, convenient.

>Low is not a tactical disadvantage. Not when it can move around.

Yeah, you learned a lot about observation in that whopping week of training didn't you.

> And yet you were made by your parents

Not sure that works as well as you think it does.

> "Bro, you are really tying to convince me that a: slow moving, undefended, low to the ground, plastic, multi-thousand dollar attractive nuance is an advantage over security cameras... because... 3D Space?"

> Yup.

Meanwhile, in reality these things get attacked with barbecue sauce and tarps before being deemed pointless and expensive. (Happened in 2017)

> Because moving on the ground is like .. exactly what the job of a security guard is.

It's more than walking beats. But you'd know that if you had more than a week.

>We like walk around and observe whats going on in exactly the same way this bot does.

Yeah, but you can defend yourself from a tarp. You dont become suddenly useless cause someone sprayed sauce on you.

> What are you doubting here ?

That you are in any kind of "graduate program"

>What would one gain from lying about that.

Trying to seem more well educated in order to win this argument that you have lost horribly.

>Its not like its some high tier profession that only the select few can do. I was making 13.50 an hour.

Wow, you worked as a minimum wage guard at some cushy office after a whopping week of training.

That qualifies you so much to speak on security systems, huh?

> For someone who knows literally 0 about what the job entails you sure like to pass judgement about what makes a good security officer.

You had ONE WEEK of training.

>Any time something dangerous happens the police are called to resolve the issue. They have the relevant legal authority.

So again.... what is the advantage over security cameras then?

>because it can move in 3d space. Seeing things through static cameras that you cant manipulate in 3d space is like really hard.

Those cameras look incredibly low to the ground to be of a tactical advantage. I highly doubt you know what you are talking about at this point. Also not sure how 3D space is relevant at all here. Explain.

>But once again you wouldnt know about that if youve never been in the industry.

I don't need to be to know this is a shit idea, which is why I doubt your credentials.

>Call that a meme or whatever you want. Ignorance is ignorance.

It's a meme.

>Yup. Every fucking time. EVERY FUCKING TIME you show complete ignorance about what people in an industry Ive worked in actually do all day I will call you out on not knowing what you are talking about.

The jokes write themselves.

>Dont get me wrong there are people whove never worked in security who know what the job entails. You just happen not to be one of those people.

Bro, you are really tying to convince me that a: slow moving, undefended, low to the ground, plastic, multi-thousand dollar attractive nuance is an advantage over security cameras... because... 3D Space?

How does 3D space offer an advantage over cameras and motion sensors that have a vantage point?

Explain that to be "expert."

>I left willingly because the hours never seem to match well to my graduate school program.

Doubt

>I have never been fired from a security role and have been asked to return many times since leaving the industry.

Thank god.

>Yh and when it's disabled it sends an alert for a human to come in person.

So it serves as an item to create a distraction?

>The idea isn't 0 humans in the loop. It's put these in the majority of a site area and have a smaller number of humans at a control center.

How does this offer an advantage over security cameras that are significantly harder to disable?

>I'm guessing youve never worked in security. Most security guards don't do anything other than alert more senior members.

Every fucking time. EVERY FUCKING TIME.

"I guess you just DONT KNOW" its a fucking meme at this point.

>I've worked security and can tell you a year can go by doing nothing more than sending a message to a security manager when something goes wrong.

I can see why you use past tense.

So it's a an unfixed plastic object filed with sensitive electronics that is easily disabled by a can of spray paint?

>Vandalising something with cameras sensors that can send an immediate distress signal is a very bad idea.

It's made of plastic.

Security theater.

Cant' see the advantage of this over security cameras.

/r/badfacebookmemes material here.

Like $5 at a novelty rock and mineral store

This person is a grown-ass man.

Incel tho.

This is the same kid that posted that "Some people lack IMAGINATION" now he's saying "KEEP IT FROM THE NORMIES"

I bet he has predictable opinions on socialism and women too.

"wHaT wOulD sAtiSfIy yOu"

Serious reply though: Nothing LLM based is intelligent in my eyes, the limitations are obvious and many. Unhinged bing chats where Bing begins to repeat itself is a stand out example of "it is just an advanced computer program. Like all computer programs, AI is subject to advertising. AGI is a hot topic right now, so the chances of a company like OpenAI *declaring* something AGI is high (just like people declaring things AI that arent.)

I can get decent textures out of SD, which is what I use it for.

I know this is gonna rustle a lot of feathers, but people need to not use these models to produce whole pieces. It hurts how seriously people take real artistic skills, and makes these tools look immoral.

From a creators perspective Midjourney is far from exceptional... let alone acceptable.

I think this might be more of an assistive tech than something thats going to be automating an entire orchard. Drones, even ones that can move a payload as minuscule as an apple are very energy intensive machines, and by extension more expensive to use than human labor.

I will believe it when I see it. Otherwise this just reads as snake oil.

>Microsoft are being tight-lipped on what model it is exactly though

They confirmed it is based on GTP3 at some point.

That's my theory.

Until we can confirm it does this at will folks are anthropomorphizing a UI error.

The hand is great, but membranes are better.

Yall better be making UPGRADES not "clones."

Proof of this would be cool.

Theres also the issue with the predictive text on Bing forgetting which side its on frequently.

>manners? MANNERS?

please stop shouting its rude.

Nice block pussy.

So much for "You just want to abuse power and hide things from your eyes"

>If its not injuring people, racism, sexism etc, just leave it be, man.

Eschewing manners is cool, man.

Accelerationists btfo.

It's not. Users are actively skirting the rules.