ZacPetkanas

ZacPetkanas t1_jdwrnbw wrote

Reply to Compost Needed by Smkncgar

Try to get screened stuff. I've gotten compost from an area farm which obviously took yard waste (leaves) for some of their "brown." I had bits of glass, pieces of children's toys, wire, etc mixed in. I felt like I had put trash into my garden.

4

ZacPetkanas t1_jd7ikg7 wrote

> It's not clandestine if the DEA knows about it, and presumably it's been busted and cleaned up.

Years ago I saw a listing for a house in Berlin (IIRC) that was super cheap even by Berlin pricing. In the description was something like: "Do not enter, hazardous chemical site." and a link to the DEA. Busted but not cleaned.

1

ZacPetkanas t1_jcbkft2 wrote

> Did you see my edited link above that outages are costing the us economy $150 BILLION a year. > >

NH. This is a NH subreddit.

So that's a "no" then. You have nothing but your opinion on the subject. And that's fine, but in my opinion you shouldn't go around demanding detailed numbers from other people when you've got jack squat.

I'm all in favor of discussing the pros and cons of your suggestion but you've got nothing to discuss, just your opinion on the matter.

2

ZacPetkanas t1_jcbh8lu wrote

And that's measured in......?

Finally, show your economic analysis that it would be cheaper to move lines underground, and maintain them underground as well. Don't forget the costs of diverting traffic as the linemen are working through the road surface as well as the extra costs of paving the roads because now the road crew must work around the manholes, etc.

You've posted on this thread about your feelings and demanded that other people provide you with facts counter to your feelings. Perhaps you should first provide the facts, no?

3

ZacPetkanas t1_jcbet46 wrote

> No because I know for a fact that burying lines is done all over the world. This means that other people did the analysis and determined it was worth the money.

Burying lines in Demark (for example) is a whole different kettle of fish than NH. Be specific and back up your assertion that it would be cost effective in NH to bury lines though ledge, etc.

> economic theory measure activities by total value, not absolute dollars.

What's the unit of measurement? Kilograms, gallons, yards?

2

ZacPetkanas t1_jcb1u5t wrote

> Unless you can give me a comprehensive cost comparison of business as usual compared to safeguarding the grid, your comments are purely assumptions and protecting the status quo

As are yours suggesting that burying lines would be cheaper. Shouldn't you have to provide said same?

6

ZacPetkanas t1_jboadld wrote

I'm not even a reporter, like those people who work at WMUR are allegedly supposed to be, and I believe this is what they're talking about.

HB 417-FN would amend RSA 169-C:3, II(f) to include the following in the definition of what may define an Abused Child for the purposes of RSA 169-C: > (g) Subjected to drug treatments or surgery in an attempt to alter the sex of the child assigned at birth, except in rare cases of ambiguous genitalia. For purposes of this subparagraph, ambiguous genitalia refers to a medical condition in which a child's gender at birth is in question because the genitals do not appear clearly male or female.

Hopefully all those links work.

1

ZacPetkanas t1_jawymy4 wrote

> but if you can't fix it yourself then you're doomed to the long wait list

This seems like a good opportunity for a side-gig for the mechanically inclined. Although most of the small-engine places tend to have shelves, drawers, and cubbies filled with the odd gasket, spring, or other part. Maybe that's the real issue with wait times?

1

ZacPetkanas t1_jahzsln wrote

> You want to go back to asylum's? Really? Also, they were in the process of closing when he was elected. Hyperbole that he waved his hand and cut funding for them is ridiculous.

Forty years on and Reagan is still the shallow-thinker's boogeyman. If only there had been a Democrat president with a majority Democrat congress since 1988. Oh well, what could of have been I guess.

−4

ZacPetkanas t1_ja2zzqc wrote

> > > We had friends who were exploring it some years ago as a way to “enhance” their marriage. They are now divorced, and both remarried. YMMV.

I can't imagine anyone pursuing that lifestyle and honestly believing it's going to work. The success rate must be sub 10%

7

ZacPetkanas t1_j9ymx2z wrote

> But, according to that other thread NH is safe and there is no hate here! Huh, this is a real puzzler...

From the article:

> The agency stressed that it has received no information regarding any “credible threats or scheduled events” in New Hampshire.

Hope that helps your confusion

16