ZaxLofful

ZaxLofful t1_jdxmzk2 wrote

Reply to AI being run locally got me thinking, if an event happened that would knock out the internet, we'd still have the internet's wealth of knowledge in our access. by Anjz

I agree this is great! I have been doing something like this for awhile, just in case.

A local copy of Wikipedia, that is mirrored from their official dump and rebuilt using a different front end.

My masterpiece, is almost wasteful now; when I can just have a LLM spit me out whatever I need.

1

ZaxLofful t1_j9ddo20 wrote

Reply to comment by Bakagami- in Whatever happened to quantum computing? by MultiverseOfSanity

They did much more than that good sir…Using quantum entanglement they created a quantum wormhole.

Entangling two sets of seven qbits separately, they were able to send data between the two sets; even tho the two sets of qubits never interacted with each other.

This is called a quantum wormhole because the two disjointed sets were able to send information to one another without interacting on the physical plane of existence.

In other word using quantum mechanics they were able to teleport information, which is what a wormholes is.

It’s not a wormhole that someone or something in the physical dimension, that we exist in as humans, could enter…

https://www.quantamagazine.org/physicists-create-a-wormhole-using-a-quantum-computer-20221130/

10

ZaxLofful t1_j5cz6ts wrote

Reply to comment by Red-HawkEye in It is important to slow down the perception of time for future sentient A.I, or it would become a living LOOP hell for itself by [deleted]

So then why are you assigning it random human like characteristics?

It always seems like something “mystical” or “beyond comprehension” to those that are not intricately familiar with how it actually works.

I feel you have become trapped in the concept of “anything technological advanced enough appears like magic.”

We would first have to achieve basic ass AGI, to even attempt to create an Advanced AGI like you are talking about…Actual sentience.

Also, your first comment “no one knows what sentience is” is inherently false.

We definitely know what it is, what we don’t know is what causes it to occur or the “why” of it.

We can definitely define and understand it, just by observing it….Like gravity, dark matter, and dark energy.

Unlike those forces of the universe, we would be creating every interaction and tiny piece of the AGI and thus would understand it on virtually every level.

3

ZaxLofful t1_j5cx9sk wrote

Reply to comment by Red-HawkEye in It is important to slow down the perception of time for future sentient A.I, or it would become a living LOOP hell for itself by [deleted]

Exactly and yet….You claim to.

We can very much determine the stuff you are talking about because it would be a computer process.

AGI doesn’t mean “a human brain in a computer”, which is what you are equating it to.

The first AGI and anything subsequent will just be hyper intelligent processes that accept questions and hand out answers.

They won’t be “beings” that work like the human mind and get “bored” or even think about something like that as a concept.

They won’t have a concept of time like we do, they will just be massive computers waiting for input and producing output.

During the idle time between tasks, the AGI will just be exactly that “idle”…

You are glorifying this shit like it’s a TV show, where we have given an autonomous robot actual sentience.

That’s not what we are even attempting to do with AGI, you are misunderstanding the concept of AGI entirely.

3

ZaxLofful t1_j0iv4xc wrote

Reply to comment by dcRoWdYh in What if a quantum computer could navigate a hypersonic missile?? by dcRoWdYh

It’s not that it’s discouraged, it’s that there are clear and absolute barriers to what you are talking about…Ones that are much more insurmountable that the option I just provided.

Yet you still think it’s everyone else’s fault for having more info on the topic than you, instead of just realizing that your thought was neither correct nor complete.

Either take the opinions you are given, when you post on an opinion board; or just stop caring…

While it may technically be “possible” at some point in our future, we have given you clear reasons why it would not be used for this type of scenario.

People use to think quantum entanglement was a joke or not something useful, even Einstein was confused by it…now we are using it more and more.

If something like that can be overcome, then it would stand to reason there is a different way that we are yet unaware to overcome the plasma problem…

Edit: You are using absolutely terms like “it can’t”, but no one else talking to you is doing so. They are telling you why it would be impractical for use on something that is intended to blow up.

7

ZaxLofful t1_j0it2eq wrote

Reply to comment by LaunchTransient in What if a quantum computer could navigate a hypersonic missile?? by dcRoWdYh

Have you even read the latest development of wormhole in a quantum chip?

They figured out a method to do the exact thing you are talking about, you are out of date my friend…

The paper talks about how they are able to push information thru another version of space time, essentially another dimension that only this QBits interact with and not us.

Edit: Here is a better explanation of what happened:

https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/physicists-observe-wormhole-dynamics-using-a-quantum-computer

^that one talks about how ER = EPR, which is really the most important part of the discovery and how Einstein initially disregarded it^

−3

ZaxLofful t1_j0isx6u wrote

Reply to comment by dcRoWdYh in What if a quantum computer could navigate a hypersonic missile?? by dcRoWdYh

It still wouldn’t matter…First, because of what was already said.

Second, because that’s not how a quantum computer even works…The recent “wormhole” stuff also called “spooky action at a distance” by Einstein, requires to complete quantum entangled entities to function. To send even a small amount of data it requires you to destroy the connections at one end, to receive the data at the other end. Which means at best you could receive one small burst of data.

Third, there really is just no need; we use missiles on stationary targets or at least semi-stationary.

Simple is almost always better in the case of technology like this, heat seeking missiles only need a small amount of data.

The missile would need to be able to relay its position back to this quantum computer in real-time, for it to be effective.

4

ZaxLofful t1_iy3fc5c wrote

Reply to comment by apinanaivot in Why is VR and AR developing so slowly? by Neurogence

If a person gets motions sickness when on a real boat, how is a VR headset supposed to cancel that?

I’m not talking about the “bug” that some people experience where it makes them sick, just using the headset…I’m talking about immersion.

Either way, I’m excited for the next steps in that article.

1

ZaxLofful t1_iy3e3g7 wrote

Reply to comment by apinanaivot in Why is VR and AR developing so slowly? by Neurogence

It can already convince the brain so throughly of what is being seen, that people are given vertigo….Others get motion sickness from being on a ship at sea.

The visual part of the game is solved, the problem you are struggling to grasp is that VR as just a headset cannot go much farther.

What is needed now is the rest of it, the ability to touch, feel, and move freely in the VR space.

These techs are being developed, but are extremely expensive.

The least of which would be the Omni One treadmill, supposed to happened sometime next year.

https://omni.virtuix.com/

1