That is astonishingly ugly.

Four feet and twelve inches is five feet.

There's no way that Israel is happier than all but three countries in the entire world.

…Margaret Thatcher? I wish she were a fictional character!

I really don't think that the problem is too much content. Instead, I think it's a problem of that content being too uneven. If every project were as acclaimed as Andor or WandaVision, no one would be writing articles like this.

Not that I want them to get it, but that's a pretty smart play.

Not really, I'm afraid! I was maybe four years old at the time. But I do remember that there were a few different flavors, one of which had little meatballs that looked like Pac-Man's Power Pellets.

Ah, I just found a page about it.

I remember this stuff! I think it was my favorite when I was little.

Here's the transcript to the audio story about the study.

His brief role in The Thin Red Line is great.

If you're interested, the WGA lists the writing credits for all episodes here.

Some of those are spot on, but several are much less influential.

It's easy - and fully justified - to be disgusted with her. But her "leadership" was always an illusion. The only power she ever held was what the junta granted her… and then took away once she was no longer useful to them.

I don't particularly care anymore what happens to her personally, but the junta's continued lawlessness should always be challenged.

Is there any amount of money that would allow New York to control the rat population? They've spent millions, but would even billions be enough?

Spencer Tunick! I took part in a photo shoot of his once. Over 2700 fully nude humans, myself included. It was, to say the least, a memorable experience.

My point was really just that if the only source is a story on someone's TikTok, it's hard to tell whether it really happened.

Any way to verify that this actually happened?

Is it loaded language? Sure. Is it hyperbolic? In terms of impact, I honestly don't think so. If one is advocating on behalf of an ecosystem, as is sometimes the case both rhetorically and legally, some human terms are going to be applied. No one literally wages war against the environment and no one can literally terrorize a habitat, but the end result is equivalent: human-caused carnage endured by organisms that can't defend themselves from people's actions.

Still, your objection is valid and I'll try to rephrase it.

If, by any chance, the person that did it thought they were standing up for animal rights, they actually just committed something akin to an act of terrorism against the local environment that will have consequences for decades. Wildlife in that region will be devastated.

Edit: To be clear, I believe that mink farms are abhorrent and should banned. But unleashing tens of thousands of predators into the local ecosystem is quite terrible.

My brain is in trouble for so many different reasons. I'm basically screwed.