chullyman
chullyman t1_jae6laf wrote
Reply to comment by Yum_Kaax in Salisbury Novichok poisoning medics 'still traumatised' by DeathHamster1
I don’t believe this person was talking about naturally occurring toxic materials. I think they meant venoms, or poisons originating from animals. Either way I would agree lead can be deadly in high doses, but is much harder to poison someone with than Novichok. Not a very good tool for assassins.
chullyman t1_jae5qqi wrote
Reply to comment by ForgottenDreamshaper in Salisbury Novichok poisoning medics 'still traumatised' by DeathHamster1
If you’re talking about the Blue Ringed octopus, then the treatment is to get put on a ventilator until the venom leaves your system. Symptoms are pretty noticeable, and respiratory depression is what kills you.
As long as you’re at a hospital in time, approx 30 min, they would start treating those symptoms regardless of knowledge of the source , taking the guesswork away.
Just to respond to your earlier statement. Novichok is very deadly, and does kill people most of the time. There is no cure, only treatment, and it does cause long term damage for many people who survive. If you’re wondering why the Russians use it, it’s because it’s easy to administer to someone, and it’s distinctly Russian, meaning they can use it as a political tool, to spread fear.
chullyman t1_jacq41p wrote
Reply to comment by ForgottenDreamshaper in Salisbury Novichok poisoning medics 'still traumatised' by DeathHamster1
Tell me which animal poison kills “for certain and very fast” once timely medical attention is administered.
chullyman t1_j9cci0x wrote
Reply to comment by AudiieVerbum in According to a new study, researchers propose a novel theory about how the molecules of life may have developed a preferred chirality, or “handedness.” Understanding more about how the concept influences our living beings could help scientists develop drugs to fight molecular disease, like cancer. by Impossible_Cookie596
So then it’s not really methamphetamine
chullyman t1_j8z35ve wrote
Reply to comment by QuestionableAI in A great sense of purpose may help adolescents to be happier and more satisfied with life. by lenova_kobuda
Honest question, what are we to do with this information?
chullyman t1_j5xdl93 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Justin Trudeau gets swarmed by protesters walking to Ontario restaurant by No-Atmosphere9320
The liberals got more seats than the conservatives.
chullyman t1_iz04pe2 wrote
Reply to comment by TaftIsUnderrated in [OC] Canadian immigrant population by place of birth by Kep_
They stop in the US and don't leave
chullyman t1_ivyh97g wrote
Reply to comment by BioTechproject in A first-of-its-kind experiment simulating the cosmos with ultracold potassium atoms suggests that in a curved, expanding universe pairs of particles pop up out of empty space by marketrent
> 2 particles are created out of the field at the event horizo, the black hole looses the energy/mass [as they are interchangeable] of 2 particles.
If the particles are created outside of the black hole, at the event horizon. How is it the black hole losing mass? These particles did not originate from the blackhole, they originated in the space many miles away from the blackhole. From my understanding of what you said the blackhole would be purely gaining mass.
chullyman t1_ivxy1ta wrote
Reply to comment by BioTechproject in A first-of-its-kind experiment simulating the cosmos with ultracold potassium atoms suggests that in a curved, expanding universe pairs of particles pop up out of empty space by marketrent
My understanding of this was that there was some kind of bias to pull antimatter in over the event horizon, shrinking the black hole. Although I don’t understand how’s it works. Am I wrong to make this assumption?
chullyman t1_jaf29zl wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Germany tells Israel death penalty would be a mistake by misana123
> So, 80 years ago, you killed off everyone you didn’t like–even people who had caused you no harm
>”you”
No not “you” the German government is different now. Your argument makes no sense.