dex3r
dex3r t1_j9t3h1t wrote
Reply to And Yet It Understands by calbhollo
That's deeply chilling
dex3r t1_ixqpddj wrote
Reply to comment by Polydoris in Your perfect guide to understand the role of Python in Artificial Intelligence (AI) by Emily-joe
Sorry, I meant TensorFlow of course.
dex3r t1_ixq2b1y wrote
Reply to Your perfect guide to understand the role of Python in Artificial Intelligence (AI) by Emily-joe
This article of course does not answer the question in the title. It states some irrelevant differences between python, cpp and Java (why those 3? who knows). Then lists python features, that can be found in many other languages.
The truth is that Python is not particularly special for AI, it was just chosen by Google to build early, popular AI libraries like PyTorch TensforFlow.
>Using Python ML libraries, a sample Pile of Cores (PoC) was built to detect basic emotions
Pile of Cores? Not Proof of Concept? OK.
dex3r t1_iwgnfuf wrote
Reply to comment by AppropriateHamster in I have created a directory of 180+ AI Tools. Check it out by AppropriateHamster
I'm looking for tools tailored for gamedev specifically, but otherwise in general any code, 2d, 3d, texture, materials, story (lore), music, sound effects etc. generators fall under that.
dex3r t1_iwgkcdm wrote
Reply to comment by AppropriateHamster in I have created a directory of 180+ AI Tools. Check it out by AppropriateHamster
I've seen gaming, but that is not the same as gamedev. Gaming is playing games, gamedev is making them. Anyway, great job on the site and thanks for making that!
dex3r t1_iwg7n2f wrote
There is still no tools specifically for gamedev or just no category?
dex3r t1_ivsodmd wrote
Reply to Climate change: efforts to halt rise in global temperatures may be too late to save key glaciers, report warns by wmdolls
To most people headlines like that don't meant anything. Glaciers? They have no idea why should the care about glaciers. Even worst, 4 degrees climate change sounds not that bad, but in reality it's a complete disaster.
dex3r t1_iv1duzj wrote
I don't know about blood, but there are only three known cases of transmissible cancer. Probably the most famous one is the CTVT. It's sometimes wrongly called by the press "immortal dog". https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canine_transmissible_venereal_tumor
dex3r t1_iuxcqlb wrote
Reply to comment by RustyShackleford2525 in A Simple Analysis Of Twitter's Potential Change In Business Model [OC] by chartr
I'm assuming you are talking about darthshadow25 not Elon 😅
dex3r t1_iux71l6 wrote
Reply to comment by darthshadow25 in A Simple Analysis Of Twitter's Potential Change In Business Model [OC] by chartr
He is not the sole investor, I'm not so sure if they won't be anxious about not turning profit. Actually, I'm sure. They will be anxious, even more than before.
dex3r t1_it06ppe wrote
Reply to Does AGI have to come before ASI? by CY-B3AR
Given recent advancements in very narrow AI applications, in which ML models are much better (in this narrow task) than human, I would say Singularity could come before AGI/ASI.
I can imagine having most professions replaced by AI. Given we have artists, writers, translators, transcribers, and even therapists almost ready to be replaced by AI, a narrow AI, an almost post-scarcity world could be feasible before anyone figures out how to create AI that will match the average human in all aspects at once.
This is a wild guess not backend by anything else than intuition, of course.
dex3r t1_iqqe1lv wrote
I highly doubt the most popular site in Poland (that isn't a search engine) is jbzd.com.pl. It was a popular meme site, but definitely never in the top1, not by a long shot.
According to other sources it's not even in the top 100. Local Ebay equivalents are much, much more popular.
dex3r t1_jdqbyr4 wrote
Reply to Are We Really This Lucky? The Improbability of Experiencing the Singularity by often_says_nice
Take a look at a Doomsday Argument https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomsday_argument
> The argument goes like this: suppose that the total number of human beings that will ever exist is fixed. If so, the likelihood of a randomly selected person existing at a particular time in history would be proportional to the total population at that time. Given this, the argument posits that a person alive today should adjust their expectations about the future of the human race, because their own existence provides information about the total number of humans that will ever live.
If this is true, then we are not lucky. We are exactly in the most likely time to live. But it also means, that human population has reached its peak. Maybe we will go extinct, but maybe we will just reproduce a lot less often. Even not taking Singularity into account, the current trend looks like the second might be true.