fiendishrabbit
fiendishrabbit t1_jeec2vj wrote
Reply to comment by Unable-Classic in ELI5 What is “mastering” in a music studio setting? by Kshock95
Although frequently a remix is sold as a remaster, if the intention of the remix is to replicate the original work.
fiendishrabbit t1_je4dq9o wrote
Reply to comment by PickledSpace56 in eli5 why ancient historical buildings haven’t been kept up? Why are buildings like the Parthenon and the Colosseum in such disrepair? Greece and Rome/Italy have existed the entire time? by PickledSpace56
"History needs to be preserved" is a very modern idea.
fiendishrabbit t1_jdvu81v wrote
Reply to comment by GreenStrong in TIL the New York Times, in 1944, Introduced Readers to an Exciting New Food: Pizza by FatherWinter
Although a properly made rooster stew is quite tasty (coq au vin being the most famous example).
Though frequently it wasn't a rooster, and instead a hen that had gotten too old for laying eggs.
fiendishrabbit t1_jdunnkg wrote
Reply to comment by Imhumanator in ELI5: How is there enough water pressure to delivery water to every home and apartment in a city? by Maxweilla
The potential is there, but there are water pressure regulators installed that lowers the pressure in the tap to where it's supposed to be.
fiendishrabbit t1_jdunefw wrote
Reply to comment by JohnnyJordaan in ELI5: How is there enough water pressure to delivery water to every home and apartment in a city? by Maxweilla
There are a lot better reasons for a water storage tank on the roof than "to not require huge pumps to meet demand when everyone is taking a shower at the same time".
Pumping into a tank means that the pump does not experience any water hammer effects (which can ruin the pump) and it means that water pressure from the tap is even (since the pressure is determined by the height difference between the water surface and the tap) rather than fluctuating as it would if it was actively pressurized by a pump.
fiendishrabbit t1_jd5rw77 wrote
Reply to comment by IFuckingShitMyPants in Promising pill completely eliminates cancer in 18 leukaemia patients by mancinedinburgh
It's uncurable, but I wouldn't call it terminal. Given that the treatment will reverse AIDS into HIV and where almost all HIV carriers* will die of something entirely unrelated to them being HIV carriers.
*In countries with reliable medical care.
fiendishrabbit t1_jcqzvb3 wrote
Reply to Young man wrestles grizzly bear to save his friend's life - and succeeds by Artemis_Understood
The big question is. If a woman in a bar asks you about that facial scar, do you tell the truth or do you lie about it because the story is just too unbelievable?
fiendishrabbit t1_jb0djl6 wrote
Reply to comment by Sverker_Wolffang in Newly discovered chemicals are so deadly to fungi they are named after Keanu Reeves | CNN by Competitive-Wall2473
Probably all three. The article mentions effectiveness against both human and plant fungal infections.
fiendishrabbit t1_ja26mcd wrote
Reply to comment by JackTrippin in Madonna 1980s by steroidamoeba
I'm personally not a huge fan of the Like A Prayer era Madonna.
Personal favorites would be either the Madonna of Who's that girl world tour (Who's that girl, True Blue) for young Madonna, or Madonna around the 2000s. The 2000s had some...questionable moments... but Madonna in her Frozen music video is a total goth smokeshow.
fiendishrabbit t1_ja20oqh wrote
Reply to ELI5. What happens to ‘criminals’ when the law changes and what they were imprisoned for is no longer illegal? by L0rdTeddingt0n
What happens depends on the country.
US law says expressly that nothing changes (US federal law, US Code Title 1, § 109. "Repeal of statutes as affecting existing liabilities") unless the law specifically states that it does (some laws have done so in the past). However, that's Common law (the fundamental principle of law as applied by states descended from the British empire).
If we instead look at countries which use Napoleonic code (law based on humanist principles), they use the principle of "Lex Mitior" (the milder law). Under the milder law any change in law is supposed to benefit the accused rather than the state. So in many countries that base their law on the Code Napoleon (notably France, but really most of the EU) when a law is repealed that triggers an automatic sentence review, and if it's no longer a crime "Hey hop, you're free to go".
P.S (maybe not so ELI5): "Hey hop, you're free to go" is in practice a bit more complicated than that. Many countries that practice Lex Mitior also practice "Socialism!". So before ratification (when it's signed by parliament/congress/whatever) and long before implementation (when the law goes into effect) the law is sent out for consultation. The prison system and social services get to say "Hey, no biggie. We can deal with this relatively quickly" or "uh. We're going to need X months to prepare for that, because this is huge". So on the day the law is ratified (signed) the bureaucracy gets to work. Sentences are reviewed, prisoners are scheduled for release, social services are notified so that they can set up the ground works (sending people out with no housing, no money and no social network would be a recipe for catastrophe) , relatives are notified etc so that when it's implementation day everything is set and people can be released in an orderly and humane manner.
fiendishrabbit t1_j9tmiei wrote
Reply to comment by lascivious_boasts in How can Doctors tell if one of your kidneys isn't working? by FineLetMeSayIt
Though not always. Had a colleague with hereditary PKD and an asymmetric progression (left kidney, non-functional and a huge amount of scar tissue. Enough that they had to remove it when transplanting. Right kidney had been pulling all the weight for the last few years and was now failing as well).
fiendishrabbit t1_j994x7e wrote
Reply to comment by BillWoods6 in Eli5 How does nuclear fuel get spent so fast? by Vegetable_Noise_1124
Subcritical RTGs is a thing. Notably for the designs intended to last more than a few decades.
fiendishrabbit t1_j97ia1t wrote
The half-life is due to spontaneous decay. They're kind of unstable so there is a chance of them just going "poof" and decaying. Half-life is the time it takes for half of the atoms in any given amount of material to undergo this spontaneous decay.
However, in a reactor we've arranged it so that there is a pretty big chance that when one atom decays the neutron (small sub-atomic particle) shoots out and hits another atom, which will cause that atom to split and shoot off more neutrons, which will hit other particles and cause a cascade effect. Compare it to just shooting a billiard ball on a pool table randomly vs stacking the balls into a pyramid (shooting a ball into that pyramid will cause a whole bunch of other balls to move around).
That effect is used in a reactor, because when a whole bunch of little atoms decay quickly they release heat. In our normal powerplants they're stacked so that it happens very quickly (although our current generation is kind of inefficient and only a small percentage of the fuel is used up before the effect slows down or becomes too difficult to handle due to dangerous byproducts), and that generates a lot of heat which is used to heat water into steam and drive a steam turbine.
There is also something called a radioisotope thermoelectric generator, a nuclear battery of sorts. Basically a radioactive element that has been arranged to encourage it to just react a little bit faster. Not cascade, just generate enough heat that it can be used to generate power through the thermoelectric effect. Those batteries last a lot longer, so they're used on deep space satellites like Voyager (that travel far enough away from the sun that solar panels aren't useful anymore). Voyagers nuclear battery produced something like 60% of its original power back in 2001 (some 25 years after its launch) but theoretically a battery like this could be designed to last thousands of years.
fiendishrabbit t1_j955ikj wrote
Reply to comment by Batgod629 in Flaco the escaped zoo owl can remain in the wilds of NYC by citytiger
They're so closely related to the Great Horned Owl (native to the US, including New York state) that they might be conspecific (ie, just two different expressions of the same species), and there have been viable hybrids between the two species before.
fiendishrabbit t1_j955cfm wrote
Reply to comment by drmehmetoz in Flaco the escaped zoo owl can remain in the wilds of NYC by citytiger
Eurasian Eagle-Owl and Great Horned Owls (Bubo virginianus) have hybridized before (in zoo populations).
The Great Horned Owl is native to New York, so I would not rule it out.
fiendishrabbit t1_j90fr8c wrote
Reply to comment by Schizm23 in Are Bird courtship dances genetic or learned? by uh_buh
Birds of Paradise and Manakin birds definitely have learned dances. In particular Manakin birds practice for thousand and thousands of hours before they can get a mate (rising through the ranks of a dance group of male manakin birds).
fiendishrabbit t1_j85llez wrote
Reply to comment by PepeHacker in Deforestation in Brazil falls by 60% in first month under Lula by Competitive-Wall2473
Soy production is just as culpable. Soybean production is the second largest direct source of deforesttion in brazil and most likely the largest indirect source. For the last 20 years or so new soy farming methods (which allows soy to use previously unsuitable land) have taken over land that's previously been used for cattle grazing. After soy has been used to increase land fertility it's followed by other agricultural produce such as maize.
So targeting beef in particular when one of the big drivers is animal products in general (as soybeans are used as protein for animal feed)...
fiendishrabbit t1_j6pcg2u wrote
I kind of imagine this as a ping-pong ball going up and down. The ping-pong ball always travels at the speed of light.
Now ping-pong ball is put on a ship, and that ship starts travelling. The ping-pong ball is still moving at the speed of light, but as the ship travels faster and faster the ping-pong ball is moving sideways. From inside the ship the ping-pong ball is going up and down (and time stays normal, but only from the perspective of the observer that's travelling with the ping-pong ball). From an outsiders perspective the ping-pong ball is going to move in a zig-zag movement. As the ship goes faster the zig and zags will be longer and longer, and so (since the ball always travels at the speed of light) it's going to travel up and down slower.
Now. This is applied to all reactions between particles. Everything is going to move slower and slower since their movement is capped at the speed of light and more and more of their movement is taken up by keeping up with the movements in realspace. Until, when the ship travels at the speed of light, time becomes infinitely slow.
fiendishrabbit t1_j6jnu4y wrote
Reply to ELI5: Why do european trucks have their engine below the driver compared to US trucks which have the engine in front of the driver? by Naofumitarddv
European conditions and regulations favor a cabover configuration:
- Shorter length. European countries have stricter overall length regulations.
- Better overview when in dense traffic.
- More urbanized and older road network also favors shorter and better overview as you have a better idea where the outer corners of your truck are (good when in tight spaces).
P.S: Meanwhile a conventional truck is more aerodynamic, it's easier to access the engine and it's a smoother ride since you're behind (and not over) the forward axle. So it's a favored configuration when you have longhaulers on long open roads (like much of the US).
fiendishrabbit t1_j6hi39x wrote
Reply to eli5 what is the point of therapy? by dumbass__stupid
A therapist is there to help you help yourself.
- Help you identify the problem and, if that problem seems too big and intimidating, help you see that it's a problem that can be solved.
- Help you come up with a coping strategy or finding a path healthier state of mind.
A big hurdle for therapy is that you have to genuinely want to change.
fiendishrabbit t1_j6fju4s wrote
Reply to comment by series_hybrid in ELI5: How do they come up with names for countries in foreign languages? by bentobam
Peking is actually a victim of european pronounciation drift. When we started spelling it Peking (17th century) the pronounciation of those letters were relatively close to the chinese pronounciation. Then the p:s hardened and the normal pronounciation of k:s became /k/ instead of /ʒ/
fiendishrabbit t1_j3szofz wrote
Reply to comment by mlaforce321 in Why were granades unused during the 15th and 16th century? by Hunter7695
Note that Byzantine grenades were more like Molotov cocktails than what we think of as grenades.
Main reason why grenades were used in a very limited fashion until the early modern era (16th century) is the lack of a reliable fuze. It wasn't until the gunpowder fuze that you could reliably light an enclosed and thrown explosive charge, early gunpowder weapons (outside China and India) used loose gunpowder to guide the flame to the main charge and that loose gunpowder would have been scattered when you threw the weapon.
We see the first traces of match cords In the mid 15th century
fiendishrabbit t1_j2ay0ih wrote
Reply to comment by iNd3xed in ELI5: Why does putting one foot out from under the blankets bring so much relief of heat while laying in bed? by SirDuke6
If I remember my biology right, on average it takes 45 seconds for blood to make a full round-trip. Very fast in the aorta, much slower elsewhere.
fiendishrabbit t1_j1mphiq wrote
Reply to comment by ReecoElryk in What did the public actually want in the Iranian revolution of 1979? by ReecoElryk
It's a bit more complicated, and Khomeini was more the "last man standing" after the Shah had used support from the US and British foreign intelligence services to de-organize and effectively weaken the democratic/liberal rebels (which were city based).
The religiously motivated rebels, who had the majority of their support in the countryside, were not as vulnerable to such tactics and ended up being the strongest rebel group. As such Khomeini gradually managed to sweep up more and more rebel groups under his banner.
fiendishrabbit t1_jefsxi2 wrote
Reply to comment by I_AM_A_CLICHE_IKNOW in Eli5: how do scientists know how dinosaurs sound? by ComputerUpbeat1714
Dinosaurs most likely had a Syrinx, just like their bird descendants. And a syrinx is much more capable of making a wide variety of noises (and it generally does not involve the hyoid bones) than the mammal larynx.
As for modern birds "chirping". Modern birds have a very wide variety of sounds they can make. Take an ostrich for example and google what kind of sounds they can make (make sure to google ostrich mating call since many results don't bring that up).
Or google lyre birds if you really want to know the capabilities of a birds syrinx when it comes to generating sounds.