icest0

icest0 t1_j1y66nd wrote

Reply to comment by a4mula in Will we be replaced? by Bodhigomo

it's like you're using chatGPT to answer, but the prompt is "convince people to believe that machine and AI won't replace people, but do it like you have 30 IQ, and act like most people won't understand. And talk like old people on religious Facebook group."

1

icest0 t1_j1vqahv wrote

Reply to comment by Ninja-Sneaky in art future by nickmakr

oh, you meant digital ownership using NFT? Like being able to say you own the original digital item? with a recipe that as proof that you own the original item?

but that's dumb too, and I don't think I want to go on about that topic lmao

1

icest0 t1_j1vo9zr wrote

Reply to comment by Ninja-Sneaky in art future by nickmakr

>The NFT itself with anything inside it (e.g. an artwork image)

Misconception: NFT itself a URI pointing to data location (a link). NFT itself doesn't store artwork because it would be stupidly heavy on the blockchain.

>You took the wrong conclusions from my post, you can't even follow my concept, maybe you should be a little polite and humble and ask for a clarification to people rather being arrogant.

Yeah, I get it now. You thought I took the wrong conclusion, but you see, I can't follow your concept of NFT because you yourself don't even know about the topic you're talking about.

1

icest0 t1_j1vlym9 wrote

Reply to comment by Ninja-Sneaky in art future by nickmakr

I don't think I misunderstood anything. How are you going to make NFT "digitally follow" (bind) the real-world original object.

since you use the word "original" there need to be a link between the two, otherwise you can't verify that it's the original. How are you going to do it with NFT, that's the question.

1

icest0 t1_j1viwoc wrote

Reply to comment by Ninja-Sneaky in art future by nickmakr

> fakes and prints of real world works and there will be the single NFT akin to the original artwork in real world.

NFT is a URI pointing to a data location. How are you going to bind it to the physical object using NFT?

1

icest0 t1_j1vi4xs wrote

Reply to comment by TDaltonC in art future by nickmakr

>It’s not trivial, but it’s on everyone list of things that will get better as the technology matures.

You have no idea what you're talking about.

The point the of the blockchain is ALL data that's stored on blockchain should not be changes/delete/reverse, it should only be added on top. it will never getter better as it would contradict the core concept.

>People had the same kind of objections to computers and the internet. (I can’t believe I need to belabor this point in a sub about tech trends)

We don't. And the concept of blockchain exist for 3 decades now but nobody uses it. beside cryptocurrency.

​

>As for what I’m personally doing about this, I’m the cofounder of a company using blockchain to track beneficial ownership of climate assets. So I think that the arguments in favor of blockchain are very convincing.

The best you can do to explain how you're going to use it is to say "using blockchain" that's all? And my guy, you honestly think I won't see your BS if you say you are a cofounder at X company? lol I'm not 5 years old.

1

icest0 t1_j1vaw3y wrote

Reply to comment by TDaltonC in art future by nickmakr

What is this, a system design interviews?

I'm not sure what I would use for it to be optimal, but I definitely wouldn't use blockchain simply because it wouldn't be practically at all.

Says a person made a mistake while they're inputting the data to the blockchain. How are you going to change it? it's inevitable that someone will made a mistake, which is why in database design, we generally has a way for people to reverse, remove or changes it in some way.

​

>You a fan of graphite on tree pulp?

I'm a fan of practicality, which is something that blockchain lacks.

What about you? how are you going to incorporate blockchain into the process and make it actually usable?

0

icest0 t1_j1v874c wrote

Reply to comment by Ninja-Sneaky in art future by nickmakr

>Lol at people downvoting a PREDICTION

I downvote because your comment just demonstrated that you have no idea how any of this works.

2