TDaltonC
TDaltonC t1_j278m3q wrote
Reply to comment by SuperSpread in TSMC starts volume production of 3nm chips by filosoful
But what about AI and ma jerb? /s
TDaltonC t1_j1vfkgs wrote
Reply to comment by icest0 in art future by nickmakr
That is exactly the kind of usability problem that is totally real, but also very manageable. It’s not trivial, but it’s on everyone list of things that will get better as the technology matures. People had the same kind of objections to computers and the internet. (I can’t believe I need to belabor this point in a sub about tech trends)
As for what I’m personally doing about this, I’m the cofounder of a company using blockchain to track beneficial ownership of climate assets. So I think that the arguments in favor of blockchain are very convincing.
TDaltonC t1_j1v7vpe wrote
Reply to comment by icest0 in art future by nickmakr
If you were designing a public ownership registry from scratch today, what technology would you use for settlement and clearance if not blockchain? You a fan of graphite on tree pulp?
TDaltonC t1_j1v6p11 wrote
Reply to comment by jujubee2522 in art future by nickmakr
The public discourse on this is all very confused, so you’re not alone.
TDaltonC t1_j1v2d16 wrote
Reply to art future by nickmakr
ERC721/1155 (NFTs) is a smart contact technical specification. Asking about that might be the wrong question. Is the further of art ownership attribution digital? Yes. Is the future of digital ownership record keeping blockchain based? Yes.
TDaltonC t1_j2ytdtx wrote
Reply to Self-driving stroller aims to reduce parents’ stress – at cost of £2,700 by diacewrb
The “pedal assist” and downhill regenerative breaking would be nice honestly.
. . . Oh sorry, are we only shitting on CES stuff this year?