nebkelly

nebkelly t1_jac4vpp wrote

I agree. With the HD line I feel like I am putting a bag over my head. Or the sound is 'hot' or some such ridiculous analogy. Some people don't notice it, and others feel it is a feature not a bug.

2

nebkelly t1_ja2y4bi wrote

The set design, cinematography and sound editing was so on point for me. Subtle audio cues *ding*, cuts, and close ups elevated the show. The only 2022 show that beat it in editing was The Bear imo.

9

nebkelly t1_j971cfj wrote

I game a lot and am stuck on ATH-AD900. Audio Technica unlocked some kind of god mod treble, combined with an ultra wide soundstage on that model.

X2HR, AD2000x, and HD600 were all let downs recently but I want to try the 800s.

1

nebkelly t1_j2chne3 wrote

AD2000x, LCD-1 etc?

Why buy cheaper high impedance cans and cheap stacks to power them when you could put that $ into more expensive low impedance cans that can run off any source and sound better.

I would post a thread asking this but my account is too new.

(also no offense to OP, I'm sure your setup sound wicked)

1

nebkelly t1_j1jzd4z wrote

It is very corny at times, the casting was very different to the books, some of the main actors are not great. While the overall plot is cool (Earth v Mars v Belters), what actually happens each season is fairly silly and disjointed.

An example of a much better modern SF show is For All Mankind and... that show is maybe a 7 or an 8/10 compared to The Wire or whatever TV benchmark you want to use.

Unfortunately there is not a huge amount of spaceflight SF so people lap up what content we can get.

Edit - strongly ecommend reading the series before watching, or even just the first book.

1

nebkelly t1_iycw1cj wrote

It was savaged by actual Submariners back in the day but I enjoyed it as much as just about every other Tony Scott movie (a lot).

3

nebkelly t1_iybkgta wrote

I follow US politics pretty closely for a foreigner and it used to be an important topic on the national agenda around the 2000s. It was raised during campaigns, debates etc. Parties had policies. International news ran stories on it.

Misrepresenting it as a southern/border states problem is the level the conversation has devolved to now. This is a group of exploited Americans that is spread nationwide and larger in number than Asians.

I believe the moral failure is simple economics/greed. Removing those workers from the US, or granting them rights and paying them properly and giving them social services, would pretty much tank the US economy. They are responsible for 15% or something of all US GDP.

There is nothing that really compares to it outside of the US and its become a shelved subject because of the economic boon from allowing it to continue unresolved.

3

nebkelly t1_iyb9lim wrote

A good example is Americans attaking Qatar about imported workers when they have as many as 25 million exploited and undocumented workers in the US. Apparently they make up like 50% of farm workers and 75% of factory workers there. And way more than 6,500 die on the job every year. Also, the US is a developed, first world country lol.

I honestly can't remember the last time a US politician, media person or podcaster talked about it. They talk about cracking down on border control sometimes. But never about outcomes for the existing population.

They have quietly recreated an undercaste class that was lost when actual slavery was banned.

8