ninjamansidekick

ninjamansidekick t1_jbeost5 wrote

No, and it's quite possible the info I had read was anecdotal. I have spent more time than I should in the literature on transgenderism in an effort to better understand my kid. The problem I quickly found is that solid info is hard to find, as most is propaganda for one side or the other. I also found that sources outside the US often tended to be less political and more data driven. But admittedly the "Terf" movement in Britain may be the source for my original thought, and that would certainly make it anecdotal as they do not represent mainstream LBG views in the US.

−1

ninjamansidekick t1_jbd1cvc wrote

My understanding is that is not quite true. While a Trans women's brain may have a thicker cortex which is more common among females the extra volume is not in the same areas as is common in females, and more to my original point my understanding is these comparison were between trans identifying individuals and heterosexual brain scans, would we see the same differences when compared to a homosexual brain scan? The brain stuff is very interesting, but I do not think it is as conclusive as activists on either side of this issue want it to be.

4

ninjamansidekick t1_j8vcwo6 wrote

I was up in Franconia notch a couple weeks ago it was icy, used my spikes but no need for snow shoes. And given the weather of the last week depending on temp that day might be more mud than ice.

3

ninjamansidekick t1_j53rclb wrote

It's a complex issue and for me as parent I don't want my kid to wake up some morning 10 years from now and realize they will never have children of their own because of a decision that was made as a confused 13 year old. What is my response if am asked why I let it happen?

I am sympathetic to idea that transgender teens exist and they should be supported, I am not convinced they exist in the numbers we are seeing. So the question I ponder is: Is this current trend of transgenderism helping or hurting more kids as a whole?

To me the simple answer is wait and see. I do recognize that early transition maybe beneficial in some cases, but that does not out weigh all the potential damage of misdiagnosis given the long term effects of most of the treatments.

History has more than one example of well intended social movements with scientific backing that did not age well. We often forget that humans have been around for awhile and we might not be as smart as we think we are.

5

ninjamansidekick t1_j53ko0a wrote

My understanding was that pharmaceutical remedies for genderdysphoria was fairly uncommon and a "wait and see" with counseling was the preferred method before the recent push for gender affirming care.

Having spent a lot of time down this rabbit hole. My conclusion is that our children are suffering, but the broad net cast by the gender activists is not helping because I do not believe the proposed solutions are a one size fits all and the political rhetoric makes it hard to have real discussions to find a lasting solution.

5

ninjamansidekick t1_j53hnvv wrote

Current transgender treatment is cross sex hormones which is a life time drug regiment. Why has there been no work in treating gender dysphoria with same sex hormones? Why are we trying to bend the body to the mind instead of bending the mind to the body? Same sex hormone treatment would be temporary and much less likely to cause irreversible long term damage. Unpopular idea, but if you look at this issue objectively this makes way more sense than the current path we are on. Unless there is more to this than the long term health of our children.

−1

ninjamansidekick t1_j033is9 wrote

It's gonna be an up hill fight. My bro works corporate safety and company vehicles are often targets for people looking for a pay out. If you had a police report you would be fine no police report burden of proof is on you.

9

ninjamansidekick t1_iymhu6x wrote

It will throw your Merrimack commute off but have you looked at the western side of state in the Keene area? Bradly International in Hartford is a little over an hour and it is a much easier drive in and out than Logan.

3

ninjamansidekick t1_irt9ci1 wrote

Born and raised in New England, never owned a set of snow tires. Mostly because I never wanted to deal with the hassle. You have to store snow tires all summer, then you have to swap tires every season. Not saying they are not worth it, but not something I ever wanted to deal with. That being said, not all tires are created equal and a good set of AT tires usually are not cheap, but usually well worth it.

2