Here’s a guy who is oblivious to the current academic climate and the nonsensical idea pathogens that are being fed to students.

This is the garbage you’re paying for when you send your kid to Middlebury for $75k/year.

Thank you!

Do I think that advertising for medical study subjects is the same as advertising for whale watch tickets? Yes.

Yeah, I know what they're doing. It's ADVERTISING. Maybe we should see posts about Bruins tickets or "Hey, come on a whale watch"...

My point is, there are more appropriate places to advertise medical studies than a general discussion board ABOUT VERMONT.

This is a VT sub. There is nothing here about VT. This is literally an advertisement to be a test subject.

Maybe there is a sub for Medical Studies.

WTF has this sub become?

Yeah, I know it's from the VPO. My comment still stands

This article is such heavily biased garbage, and this guy is an idiot.

Skewed and biased? Your studies that you reference are garbage, and your logic is garbage. I could poke a thousand holes is your 'argument' that '40% of all cops in the US are wife beaters' but just that statement alone is moronic. You're using stats (poorly) to validate your narrative. Waste of time...

I can't see your whole comment, but let me relpy:

I think that you're cherrypicking your 'facts' to fit your narrative. And by 'facts' I mean this bullshit article that you linked me to.

You didn't even understand the first scentence, and you took that as "40% of all cops beat their wives" and then doubled down by saying "if you bump into a cop, it's a coin flip that they have beaten their wife"...

You kidding me? The stats you provide say in the first scentence "40% of police officer families experiance domestic violence." And you're equating that to "40% of all cops beat their wives"...

You're just parroting studies and taking a superficial look at the data. What about cops that experianc domestic abuse at the hands of their spouse? Yeah, that's lumped in that 40%...

Thanks for the data reference, but your interpretation of data (objectively) needs a lot of work.

Not to mention, if this was a black cop speaking out to support BLM for instance, this wouldn't have even hit the media.

My comment stands on it's own, and your reply really has nothing to do with what I said.

Down votes on my comment prove my point.

You don't need statistics to invalidate statements such as : "ALL people of X Group are like that".

That is the definition of stereotypical and prejudice.

More proof that if you speak your mind, and people disagree with you then you're labeled a bigot, racist, XXXXXphobe, etc.

So anyways, I started blasting

In honor of Dogs & Cats, consider donating to the humaine society...see, just as useless as this post.

Never heard this, and this is gold. TY!!

Number 3

At least street justice is working. Until the state starts actually punishing criminals, this will continue to happen.

But hey, one scumbag dead and one in jail on murder isn't a bad deal!

They honestly don't need to give a reason, and in today's political climate, it's in their best interest not to.

And you're hoping that they get in legal trouble for NOT signing a document, because if they do not, they are being discriminatory????

Sounds like you've made up your mind: if you don't buy into this declaration and champion it then you're racist and discriminatory. Accurate?

More of a statement/question than question but that's fine.

Do I agree with you? Probably not. Seems that your statement/question makes some assumptions and your stating what the Highgate Select Boards are implying...ao you're drawing your own conclusion rather than seeking truth.

And you state that you "hope it's illegal" that they decided not to align themselves with a special interest group. I certainly don't agree with that.

Where is it saying that the Highgate Town Council recinded this because they don't want to be associated with Ernie Royal?

Holy shit, someone who gets it