resorcinarene
resorcinarene t1_j9rk98n wrote
Reply to comment by Quiet-Shallot3290 in The way your BF/GF speaks to his/her mom/dad will be the very similar to the way he speaks to you in marriage. by stepneo1
So if one partner in the relationship says they're hungry, the other is supposed to jump up and travel 2-hours to feed them? What kind of low self-esteem worthless sap doesn't see the problem with that? lol
I don't know your personal situation, but if The above sounds like familiar of behavior, I hate to tell you this but you're being abused. Ignore the language for a second focus on the actual behavior being described. It's unhealthy.
I admit that the words are crass, but It doesn't change the fact that the behavior above involves one person being taken advantage of. You don't have to defend it if that describes you. Take inventory of your value and say no, maybe lol
resorcinarene t1_j9rg0ts wrote
Reply to comment by Quiet-Shallot3290 in The way your BF/GF speaks to his/her mom/dad will be the very similar to the way he speaks to you in marriage. by stepneo1
What do you have against urban slang to describe uneven burden-sharing in a relationship?
resorcinarene t1_j9re1lk wrote
Reply to comment by Quiet-Shallot3290 in The way your BF/GF speaks to his/her mom/dad will be the very similar to the way he speaks to you in marriage. by stepneo1
Simp is the gen-z term. We used to call it pussy whipped - same concept.
resorcinarene t1_j9pr1ie wrote
Reply to comment by woodycodeblue in The way your BF/GF speaks to his/her mom/dad will be the very similar to the way he speaks to you in marriage. by stepneo1
There's no way this mope does this in a healthy relationship between two equal partners. Dude is either an unemployed simp with nothing else to do or spinning fantasy for the karma from naive teenagers passing as adults. Dude's response does not represent reality lol
resorcinarene t1_j9pbaso wrote
Reply to comment by IDoPokeSmot in The way your BF/GF speaks to his/her mom/dad will be the very similar to the way he speaks to you in marriage. by stepneo1
No you wouldn't
resorcinarene t1_j6gvts6 wrote
Reply to comment by TangentSpore in 91 year old coffee from the United States - unopened by OneUpExtraLife
Highly doubt that lol
resorcinarene t1_j6e6jka wrote
Reply to comment by KennyFulgencio in Three seconds of audio could end up costing Fox $500,000 by blaspheminCapn
Wow, sorry your reading comprehension is limited. Dude stated this:
> Yes, i made a comment with inaccurate financial numbers on a reddit post.
That's what I said. His subsequent explanation was basically a justification of why he made up numbers. I agree that the penalty is too little, which was made clear by the following:
> $500,000 isn't enough...
Somehow, dude still replied to emphasize that his point was still valid because the numbers are large. Where did I disagree that $500K wasn't enough, again? I didn't.
Point is that neither you or numbers guy know how to read, or read too much into whatever I wrote. And yet somehow, I'm the one being harangued lol
Don't expect much from Reddit XD
edit: also, he didn't come with numbers. These are the actual numbers: https://investor.foxcorporation.com/reports/quarterly-reports
resorcinarene t1_j6e20ep wrote
Reply to comment by Slevinkellevra710 in Three seconds of audio could end up costing Fox $500,000 by blaspheminCapn
> Yes, i made a comment with inaccurate financial numbers on a reddit post. If you expected perfect accuracy and research in numbers, i really don't know what to do for you.
What makes you think I'm expecting anything from you? If anything, my comment serves to illustrate I know better than to expect accurate numbers from Reddit
> A 500k fine for this kind of offense is similar to fining the average person $1. It makes absolutely no difference whatsoever, and it will deter exactly 0 people.
So, you wrote all that because you think I'm disagreeing it's not enough when I also said this?
> $500,000 isn't enough...
I'm not really following what's motivating you lol
resorcinarene t1_j6dw127 wrote
Reply to comment by bl8ant in Three seconds of audio could end up costing Fox $500,000 by blaspheminCapn
Something to learn from being on Reddit is people are loose in numbers if they are used for their purpose. $500,000 isn't enough, but it's not 0.5% of weekly profit. Most people here don't understand numbers in general
resorcinarene t1_j65zsz1 wrote
That's a landmine not worth carrying. It set off prematurely. Consider it luck so stay away
resorcinarene t1_j55vnsg wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Study of more than 2,400 Facebook users suggests that platforms — more than individual users — have a larger role to play in stopping the spread of misinformation online by giuliomagnifico
Do me a solid. I'm at work and don't have time for the whole thing.
resorcinarene t1_j55v84u wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Study of more than 2,400 Facebook users suggests that platforms — more than individual users — have a larger role to play in stopping the spread of misinformation online by giuliomagnifico
Speak plainly. What's the summary, in your words?
resorcinarene t1_j55rbu9 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Study of more than 2,400 Facebook users suggests that platforms — more than individual users — have a larger role to play in stopping the spread of misinformation online by giuliomagnifico
What was misinformation a year ago that's a fact today?
resorcinarene t1_j55qbyf wrote
Reply to comment by _______someone in Study of more than 2,400 Facebook users suggests that platforms — more than individual users — have a larger role to play in stopping the spread of misinformation online by giuliomagnifico
No, misinformation is false or inaccurate information. That's it. Information that is deliberately intended to deceive is disinformation.
Your post is misinformation
resorcinarene t1_j4iqilz wrote
No shit lol
resorcinarene t1_j4iqgo8 wrote
Reply to comment by its-octopeople in Norwegian government funds research to find out if white paint is racist by KaptainObvious_
I read it and still have no fucking idea what their goal is:
> The objective of the research project TiO2 is to critically and visually investigate the cultural and aesthetic preconditions of TiO2 through arts-based methods that merge artistic research and art history and theory
resorcinarene t1_j1xm45d wrote
Reply to comment by lurq_king in Scientists develop blood test for Alzheimer’s disease by grab-n-g0
Eventually. R&D costs money
resorcinarene t1_j1a3ct7 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in COVID-19 Booster Increases Durability of Antibody Response, Research Shows by Additional-Two-7312
Yes, they are
resorcinarene t1_iujg29d wrote
Reply to comment by sem1845 in A billing expert investigated her husband's ER bill. She was able to knock thousands off the charge. by 11ej25
He didn't say that. He said it happened in June and updates as of 2 weeks ago he was to collect all the bills
resorcinarene t1_isbd41r wrote
Reply to Manhattan congressional candidate publishes a porn video to highlight his sex positive platform by threaljmotm
> “I’m very much an introvert,” the “very liberal” registered Democrat said. “I’m kind of a nerd who doesn’t like to be the center of attention if I can avoid it. But I thought the issues I’m trying to address are so important… I wanted to have my issues talked about in some way.”
Dude put out a sex tape and is running for a congressional seat and has the gall to say he's an introvert lmao
resorcinarene t1_j9s0cii wrote
Reply to comment by Quiet-Shallot3290 in The way your BF/GF speaks to his/her mom/dad will be the very similar to the way he speaks to you in marriage. by stepneo1
I see it perfectly clear. Make sure to get extra food for Sancho