samwiseganja96

samwiseganja96 t1_jc4b9ep wrote

The Archer is great. Cocktails are amazing. Food is great. Service is nice.

Frankie's is my second choice. The food is amazing, drinks are great, and when I've gone they've always had the best service.

Dullboy next. Great menu, ambiance, the cocktails are delicious. I've had mixed service although it never disappoints.

18

samwiseganja96 t1_jbhobpi wrote

This comment is the epitome of "I haven't understood a word I read" it's like you can only hold on to a portion of this conversation. I write something and you only comprehend 1/10th of it.

Of course I'm not so daft that I think someone can run both plates with covers. I thought we were listing possible reasons you couldn't capture a plate on your front camera. was I wrong in thinking that? From your comment you made it seem like there were only 2 ways they could avoid the camera. In reality there's a multitude.

That does not take away the fact that when you have 2 plates on a car. There's 2 locations on that car with a visible unique identifier. This will absolutely make it easier to identify a car in the event of literally ANYTHING. That means accidents, robberies, kidnappings, etc it is a valuable tool. Grow up dude.

1

samwiseganja96 t1_jbgyrk8 wrote

You seem to be under the impression that I said fear of being caught is the only reason for not commiting crimes. There's a whole host of contributing factors to why people do or do not commit crime. One of those factors is how easy the person commiting or not commiting crimes can be caught. This is the main reason why cameras are put on stores. Some stores even put fake cameras.

Again I understand if you're having a hard time understanding these concepts as you seem to be having a hard time understanding what I am saying. You seem to cherry pick certain words I use and argue against those instead of arguing against the logical statements I'm making.

3

samwiseganja96 t1_jbgky53 wrote

Yes fear of being caught. Less of a chance to be caught with 1 location on a vehicle that has a unique identifier as opposed to 2 locations with a unique identifier. Less of a chance to be caught doing something means that more people are going to do something right.

It's okay if this is a hard concept for you to understand.

3

samwiseganja96 t1_jbgbf8q wrote

I mean considering that ~50% of hit and runs aren't identified nationally I'd prefer to have anything that can increase the possibility of identification.

Considering that 5 of the states you listed also have the highest occurrence of hit and runs I'd hypothesize that not having a front plate could potentially embolden people to comit hit and runs.

Give me some time I could probably find the data for which states have the most identified hit and runs.

6

samwiseganja96 t1_jbg9ld2 wrote

The purpose is to make your car identifiable from both sides. It is useful when you experience a hit and run. It also gives you two points to identify cars in videos specifically dash cams. It also helps police identify cars. Although I don't care about that. The biggest thing is If you hit my car and I only get a view of the front of your car I have the opportunity to identify you.

8