saytn

saytn t1_j9u077n wrote

Yeah, I thought so too, and those exact parts of it stood out to me as well. Found this one from a couple years ago:

https://old.reddit.com/r/tifu/comments/jm39o7/tifu_tipping_140_to_a_pizza_delivery_driver/

It's not word for word, but like someone instructed chatgpt to rewrite a story but keep the details similar.

And the OP here looks like an OF bot account anyway, so...

6

saytn OP t1_j3b0a35 wrote

In my mind, speed limits exist on every road, but I don't know what that limit is everywhere. And I know there are parking regulations, but don't know if it's street cleaning or free parking for all eternity. Those signs are still useful for someone like me who doesn't have them all memorized for every road I'll be on. This sign is just restarting the same applicable law with no updated information, so seems quite useless to me.

1

saytn OP t1_j33o0du wrote

I see that issue all the time. I am always just amused by this sign because it's saying what the law in place already says. A right turn on red is legal after a stop at every intersection in the state, unless prohibited by a sign. So with the sign there or without it, the rules are the same at that intersection.

9

saytn OP t1_j33nh2y wrote

Yes, you are correct. My way of thinking that it is pointless was that legally, you are allowed to make a right turn on red after a full stop, so long as there isn't a no turn on red sign. Which is what this sign is saying. So in effect, the sign is stating exactly what the law you're quoting is saying. It's the same with the sign there as it is without it.

2

saytn OP t1_j33ell6 wrote

Thanks! We're definitely not ruling out returning when we get tired of shitty pizza and bagels and diners and delis and tomatoes and beaches and drivers and music and... Wait, why are we leaving again?

8