scarabic
scarabic t1_jdwmf4v wrote
Rivendell Atlantis? Is that a real brand/product name? That’s like calling your company Legolas and one of your products Chewbacca.
Check out my Legolas Chewbacca everyone!
scarabic t1_jcys7w7 wrote
Reply to comment by UKthailandExpat in Replacing stair tread by unhappyoptimist_
In fact a 100 year old house likely has some choice lumber in its stair treads. A century ago we were still tearing through old growth forests and the lumber in old houses is tighter grained than anything you even CAN buy today. There’s a reason why recovered lumber is so prized, and it’s not because it looks all “old timey.”
If OP does replace all the treads, I hope the old ones go to a woodworker somewhere. Shit I’d be happy to have them.
scarabic t1_jcj6pvg wrote
Reply to Kenworth K100 working for 30 years. by Sloth_rockets
I was reading Little House on the Prairie to my kid and we got to the chapter where one of their horses births a colt. I thought “wow, and in our age we just run cars until they stop working and then have to buy another - what a shit deal.”
scarabic t1_jabhrap wrote
Reply to comment by crabapplesteam in How do you know when to replace or fix a shed? by crabapplesteam
Just don’t pressure wash. Use a scrub brush and appropriate herbicide/fungicide. Pressure washers will tear right into old wood. A lot of decks have been ruined this way. It looks like they’re cleaning AMAZINGLY while you’re pressure washing, but that’s because it’s blasting layers away right down to bare wood.
scarabic t1_jabhi3q wrote
Reply to comment by Deadpressed in How do you know when to replace or fix a shed? by crabapplesteam
People think pressure washers are literally magic and will quickly and easily strip away only what they consider to be dirt while having zero impact on the wood or other material underneath.
scarabic t1_ja98wnq wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Corona 17-DK Kerosene Heater. Older than me(1987) and wonderfully heats my garage every winter. by biggswiggins
A lot more people use cars than kerosene heaters.
scarabic t1_j8qko3r wrote
Reply to comment by Rogueish1 in 11 states consider 'right to repair' for farming equipment by Ranew
“Gubamint reglumations? On my damn tractor, now? Get a rope!”
“No, no, grandpa these are good regulations!”
“Humph. You ain’t one of them wokes now, is ya?”
scarabic t1_j2516v9 wrote
Reply to comment by Caleb2099 in TikTok is now banned on mobile devices issued by US House of Representatives by nacorom
Yeah how many people here already work somewhere that block tiktok on the company firewall so you don’t view it at your desk? I’ll bet quite a few.
scarabic t1_j1xjq9u wrote
Reply to comment by iidesune in [OC] State by State Housing Price Growth since 1975 by fred_fotch
Um. My dude. No, I didn’t just forget about my down payment (which immediately becomes equity anyway - you knew that, right?).
The rest of this we tracked continuously and at tax time. If you’ve never owned, maybe it seems hopelessly complex and expensive to you. I can’t tell if that’s it or you just tried so hard to puff up that list that it became ridiculous. Furniture!
Anyway keep renting since you find it morally superior to be exploited than exploit. I won’t take that away from you, just the illusion that you’re somehow not involved.
scarabic t1_j1xgalo wrote
Reply to comment by iidesune in [OC] State by State Housing Price Growth since 1975 by fred_fotch
Yeah maybe that metaphor is pretty obtuse.
What I mean is that speculation bubbles don’t always have much basis in real value. Housing in particular is highly leveraged. People buy a house without having all the money for it. Banks lend them the money but they’re not entirely liquid either. The mortgage gets sold and resold, bundled into investment vehicles and derivatives. Families count on their house to be some kind of “investment” and rely on the bubble to fund their retirement. It’s a big network of over-leveraged actors. It stumbles onward largely on its own momentum, but it can be totally hollow, a bubble, a “zombie.”
Renters on the other hand pay cash in hand everywhere they go. Nothing they do is permitted to be a loan or leverage. Whenever renters appear in the diagram, actual cash is flowing in. “Blood infusion.”
Maybe I meant vampire, not zombie.
To offer an example: I bought my first home in 2006, right before the big crash. I got a loan with very little down during the subprime lending spree. Then the crash happened and I wound up upside down on the mortgage. Shortly after I also needed that freedom to “vote with my feet” and move that you speak of. Know what I did? I rented the place out. I paid the mortgage, taxes, and repairs with the rent cash while the market recovered. Even pocketed some monthly profit. And once the market roared back, I sold the place at a big profit.
I was the person over-leveraged, actually at negative value, the zombie, but by feeding on renters, I was eventually made whole.
So when you say you rent because you l’re disgusted by the whole speculation market, I don’t see how that’s a solution. The buyers/sellers are still feeding on you as a renter. You’re maybe the only party in the entire picture who is always there with ready cash in hand, while everyone else is engaged in a gang-bang of credit leverage.
scarabic t1_j1wyw9b wrote
Reply to comment by iidesune in [OC] State by State Housing Price Growth since 1975 by fred_fotch
The difference is you can buy houses on credit, leverage. In a hot market, borrowing is cheap and speculation drives speculation. Rent, meanwhile, is always paid in cash. Rent is the transfusion of actual blood into what is otherwise a zombie of speculation and credit. It props up the rat race. And renters are getting squeezed hard as the balloon grows.
Sure renting has advantages. Easier to move. Predictable costs. But now we’re on a different subject. We started on rent being some kind of way out of the housing market shit show, and unfortunately it totally isn’t.
Sure, you’re paying rent for something but your rent is often paying the entire mortgage of someone else who is just sitting back gaining equity. It’s hard to say you’re throwing money away but impossible to say you’re winning or not part of the game.
scarabic t1_j1r8hvq wrote
Reply to comment by Ambitious-Event-5911 in [OC] State by State Housing Price Growth since 1975 by fred_fotch
How is renting a solution though? Rents are skyrocketing everywhere as well. Who do you think is bringing cash to this table and pouring it into speculators’ pockets? Renters.
scarabic t1_j1r89me wrote
Yay migrate out to those red states and flip em people. God knows that cheap housing prices are just about the only reason to move there.
scarabic t1_j0vhxh1 wrote
Reply to 10 years and still kicking, haven’t had to repair or replace a single part (Weber Spirit gas grill from 2012) by ScreamingPrawnBucket
I’m about to buy one of these. I’ve run two cheapshit big box budget brands into the ground in ten years.
scarabic t1_j0shw1z wrote
Reply to comment by fliguana in Would it be possible to 'carbonate' a beverage with a gas much heavier or lighter than air, and then when the consumer drinks it, the gas density changes their voice pich? Such as with the helium trick? by infadibulum
Yes the only way the gas gets into your lungs is if you let the liquid sit in your mouth while you inhale. This is a great way to choke on the liquid, and will barely get any gas into your lungs anyway.
scarabic t1_izqoo53 wrote
Reply to comment by RobusEtCeleritas in What is the difference between atomic, nuclear and hydrogen bombs? by something-stupid2134
Curious: if atomic bomb is a subset of nuclear bomb, then some nuclear bombs are not atomic bombs. Which are those?
scarabic t1_izd8pr8 wrote
Reply to comment by bruceleroy99 in Have living things always had an immune system? How did they survive / evolve to deal with diseases, and how does that compare to modern immune systems? by bruceleroy99
The same answer goes all the way down really. There’s not a single chemical process or pathway anywhere in your entire metabolism that wasn’t invented in bacteria before multicellular life came about. Even photosynthesis originated in bacteria, long before there were plants.
scarabic t1_iz0wsan wrote
Reply to comment by theonetrueelhigh in Scientists have analyzed the specific labor costs for producing a 1 carat diamond in mines and through artificial synthesis. The work of human turned out to be more effective: 26 minutes versus 2-3.5 hours. by Skoltech_
You know what's really depressing? DeBeers recently contracted Lupita Nyong'o to be their Brand Ambassador. You might remember her from the Black Panther movies - films about a sovereign African nation with a very valuable resource which they protect from exploitation by the outside world. I can't fathom how Lupita thought this was a good idea. I'm sure DeBeers will say that all of their businesses are "conflict free" NOW, but this company should be boycotted forever any anyone with a conscience.
scarabic t1_iz0w3s2 wrote
Reply to comment by Worst_username_eu in Scientists have analyzed the specific labor costs for producing a 1 carat diamond in mines and through artificial synthesis. The work of human turned out to be more effective: 26 minutes versus 2-3.5 hours. by Skoltech_
Yes whether you are using humans to mine or machines to synthesize, you can set up work in parallel, so duration to produce 1 diamond seems like a useless metric to me. Cost per karat would be more interesting.
scarabic t1_iy5ivxe wrote
Reply to comment by Psnuggs in My collection of US Made Stanley Aladdin vacuum bottles. Left to right: 2001, 1989, 1969, and 1990. All still work flawlessly. by Psnuggs
I guess this is because ice fishing involves leaving your line in for a while and you need somewhere warm to be while you wait?
scarabic t1_iy51otx wrote
Reply to comment by Psnuggs in My collection of US Made Stanley Aladdin vacuum bottles. Left to right: 2001, 1989, 1969, and 1990. All still work flawlessly. by Psnuggs
I thought five thermoses was extravagant but he’s got a whole house just for fishing! ;)
scarabic t1_iy26vw8 wrote
Reply to comment by Dr_ChungusAmungus in NASA discovery reveals there may have been life on Mars by Genevieves_bitch
You could say the presence of atoms is a promising indicator that life could have been there. After all, life isn’t possible without atoms! And we know that on earth, living things leave many atoms behind!
See how silly this sounds? It’s the same with “organic compounds.” No, it doesn’t mean anything on its own unless the types and concentrations of them are unlikely to occur naturally. Which we did not get any indication of from this video.
scarabic t1_iy26mfb wrote
Reply to comment by Dr_ChungusAmungus in NASA discovery reveals there may have been life on Mars by Genevieves_bitch
> Organic molecules can also be made by chemical reactions that do not involve life.
This is the part people often confuse. Organic compounds are not always left behind by life. Some of them form spontaneously in dirty water when exposed to sunlight.
scarabic t1_iy26fwd wrote
Reply to comment by ymgve in NASA discovery reveals there may have been life on Mars by Genevieves_bitch
Especially a short video that cuts off before saying anything interesting.
scarabic t1_je0ft2n wrote
Reply to Leica M2 from 1965. Still one of the best film cameras in the market. by slothsandstuffyeh
What makes it so good? I don’t know a lot about cameras.