stuntmanbob86
stuntmanbob86 t1_j608g1n wrote
Reply to comment by indoninja in Major railroad posts record earnings, spends more on share repurchases than on its employees by esporx
Yes it would. A second board would allow 30 days for a new report and 60 for cooldown.
stuntmanbob86 t1_j6056uw wrote
Reply to comment by indoninja in Major railroad posts record earnings, spends more on share repurchases than on its employees by esporx
Honestly though, why did he not just make a new board and see what happens vs forcing a failed contract? That would had extended things and avoid the strike.
stuntmanbob86 t1_j603zev wrote
Reply to comment by indoninja in Major railroad posts record earnings, spends more on share repurchases than on its employees by esporx
Almost half accepted it? You think if Trump got almost half the votes and they just said "fuck it, he almost got half the votes he's president", lol..... How would he think that a contract that literally gave the workers nothing that they asked for would pass? Biden was clearly for forcing the contract. That was it. The sick days was Bernies bill. All of Congress damaged unions in general for years to come. Guess what's gonna happen in a couple years? Carriers will push as hard as they can and the workers will get fucked. The carriers knew the government was on their side. Tell me you're anti-union without telling me you're anti-union, lol.......
stuntmanbob86 t1_j600w69 wrote
Reply to comment by indoninja in Major railroad posts record earnings, spends more on share repurchases than on its employees by esporx
How do you know that they would say no? We dont, cause he didnt even try. Why would he push the agreement he helped create if he knew the workers werent going to pass it? Like I said, the bill was only on the table because of Sanders, Biden didn't do dick. I dont know hoe many times I have to say that Republicans are just as much garbage as democrats are in Congress.
stuntmanbob86 t1_j5zvy0h wrote
Reply to comment by indoninja in Major railroad posts record earnings, spends more on share repurchases than on its employees by esporx
If the carriers didn't agree, they'd be going against the presidents recommendation, which most likely they wouldn't. But if they did, what difference would it have made? Why wouldn't he try? Answer is he was on the side of the carriers which the TA was leaning towards. Biden never wanted to give them sick days. Bernie was the only one who did anything.
stuntmanbob86 t1_j5zrab7 wrote
Reply to comment by indoninja in Major railroad posts record earnings, spends more on share repurchases than on its employees by esporx
No it has to be voted on by the unions. Every single thing that was in the report was in the TA. If that would had been in the report and voted on by the unions it would had been passed and there wouldn't be a need for congress. Biden thought one personal day was enough...
stuntmanbob86 t1_j5z7eyv wrote
Reply to comment by indoninja in Major railroad posts record earnings, spends more on share repurchases than on its employees by esporx
Again. The emergency board he created could had made sure it was in the contract months ago... He could had made a second emergency board of different members instead of forcing the failed contract....
stuntmanbob86 t1_j5z58pk wrote
Reply to comment by indoninja in Major railroad posts record earnings, spends more on share repurchases than on its employees by esporx
The 4 of the 12 unions it didn't pass made up more than half the workers. That's how unions work it has to pass all the unions.
stuntmanbob86 t1_j5z1zv1 wrote
Reply to comment by indoninja in Major railroad posts record earnings, spends more on share repurchases than on its employees by esporx
Listen, the point is it never had to go to congress. Biden had many options before that should have happened. Why Biden and his board never mentioned sick days should be pretty telling.
stuntmanbob86 t1_j5yznzu wrote
Reply to comment by indoninja in Major railroad posts record earnings, spends more on share repurchases than on its employees by esporx
He absolutely did have the power. He created an emergency board that basically made the tenative agreement. They thought the workers should only have one "personal" day. Never did Biden mention sick days. It was Biden and his board that are responsible for the TA.
Why wouldn't you risk it? If republicans let the economy be destroyed over 7 sick days then fuck all of them. Regardless, I never said i trusted them, i dont trust either. You don't seem to understand that carriers pay both sides.
stuntmanbob86 t1_j5ys2wp wrote
Reply to comment by indoninja in Major railroad posts record earnings, spends more on share repurchases than on its employees by esporx
I am positive they wouldn't. Too much ar stake. Even if the strike did happen, it would have lasted hours, not weeks. The carriers can't afford to lose that much.
Bottom line is it never even had to go to congress. Biden could have made sure there was sick days in the TA over the summer but he didn't. Biden wasn't ever for sick days.
stuntmanbob86 t1_j5x8n2t wrote
Reply to comment by indoninja in Major railroad posts record earnings, spends more on share repurchases than on its employees by esporx
Democrats are just as guilty as Republicans. There wouldn't had even been a bill for sick days if it wasn't for Bernie. The sick days should had been bundled with the contract. It had a way better chance of passing that way....
stuntmanbob86 t1_j5x8a68 wrote
Reply to comment by indoninja in Major railroad posts record earnings, spends more on share repurchases than on its employees by esporx
Yes, I am 100% certain it would have passed. The stakes were too high if there was a strike. Biden and his board had the chance to put sick days in the TA, they just settled on 1 personal day....
stuntmanbob86 t1_j5x7suf wrote
Reply to comment by GroundbreakingWeb963 in Major railroad posts record earnings, spends more on share repurchases than on its employees by esporx
Yeah, look into the companies that donate. You'll see that Berkshire Hathaway donates almost equally to dems and rep in congress. That's pretty telling...
stuntmanbob86 t1_j60u5z0 wrote
Reply to comment by indoninja in Major railroad posts record earnings, spends more on share repurchases than on its employees by esporx
You dont seem to understand how it works. The panel is supposed to be indepedent, they dont make the contract. They write a report with what should go into the contract. That doesn't mean they had to put it in the contract, there was no risk in doing that other than it makes the carriers look bad. If Biden was for sick days he would had made sure there was sick days in the contract.
Workers didn't get anything they wanted. The only reason some passed was because they were scared that they would have a worse one forced on them. The unions that passed it were close, not any landslides by any means.
Like I said, logical next step was a second EB. A different perspective with different members. There is no logical reason he didn't do that. It set a dangerous precedent.
We will just have to keep fighting until the government comes in and shuts us down. You don't find it disturbing congress, even democrats, take money from the carriers?