throwawaylogin2099
throwawaylogin2099 t1_jc2oyg5 wrote
Reply to comment by Tampammm in Ed O'Neill T.V. Dad by swayzeXpress815
And he ended up with Peggy Bundy too.
throwawaylogin2099 t1_jc2ornx wrote
Reply to comment by StuffonBookshelfs in Ed O'Neill T.V. Dad by swayzeXpress815
Not raping women for starters.
*Apparently some people are in favour of raping women.🙄
throwawaylogin2099 t1_j6p9cpt wrote
Reply to comment by kinvore in ‘Poker Face’ is an absolute gem of a show. Would be blowing up if it was on a larger streaming service by mattyhegs826
There have been a lot of people online over the last couple of years asking for a Columbo reboot with Natasha Lyonne in the lead as the shabby detective. I always liked that idea.
throwawaylogin2099 t1_j6p8zyt wrote
Reply to comment by Prax150 in ‘Poker Face’ is an absolute gem of a show. Would be blowing up if it was on a larger streaming service by mattyhegs826
Columbo is literally available on the same streaming service as Poker Face: Peacock. I've watched the entire run of Columbo on there.
throwawaylogin2099 t1_j6p8q9t wrote
Reply to comment by kinvore in ‘Poker Face’ is an absolute gem of a show. Would be blowing up if it was on a larger streaming service by mattyhegs826
Poker Face is direct homage to Columbo not only in the structure of the show showing the murder, who did it, and how first so we can watch the protagonist figure it out. They also use the exact same font for the credits that Columbo used. Then there is the fact that the protagonist is somebody who is dishevelled, kind of a slob, very friendly and everybody underestimates her. For a few years now I have seen people online talking about how Natasha Lyonne would be perfect to play the lead in a Columbo reboot and I think this series may have been inspired by that talk or at least the idea to cast her was.
throwawaylogin2099 t1_j13baw1 wrote
Reply to Are there any shows you would like to see the network television version of or a prestige television version of? by brettdavis4
I would say "Homicide: Life on the Streets" but they already kind of did that with "The Wire".
throwawaylogin2099 t1_j13b83o wrote
Reply to Are there any shows you would like to see the network television version of or a prestige television version of? by brettdavis4
Why the hell would you want to see a watered-down version of Mr Robot? I understand wanting to see network stuff upgraded but not the other way around.
throwawaylogin2099 t1_iyc098t wrote
Reply to comment by jrebute in What did you watch every Saturday morning as a kid? by Calm-Hovercraft9858
Classics, every one of them. 👍
throwawaylogin2099 t1_itldfrw wrote
Reply to comment by kjhwkejhkhdsfkjhsdkf in Miami Vice Reboot by Ok-Excitement-5594
> the difference between 2022 and 1982 isn't as great as the difference between 1982 and 1942,
It's 40 years difference either way. Your math is weak.
throwawaylogin2099 t1_itlcyfy wrote
Reply to comment by mickeyflinn in Miami Vice Reboot by Ok-Excitement-5594
The cops didn't actually own that stuff on the show. That was confiscated property that was used by the cops to establish their undercover identities as high rollers. But it was a tv show so why get caught up in the unrealistic details. Everything about that show was so far fetched it was almost pure fantasy.
throwawaylogin2099 t1_jegsnh4 wrote
Reply to If the first line of your future obituary says you “died doing what you love”, what are you doing when you die? by rbs1325
Sleeping.