trainmaster611

trainmaster611 t1_jcgf87v wrote

I promise you that cutting MTA's budget won't magically cause it to reform by itself. The MTA needs major structural reform to address underlying structural issues, but that's a plodding years-long process with lots of political bargaining that needs to be driven by pols who are willing to take on a messy fight. Cutting the budget without reform in place is going to make MTA take the easy route to cutting costs: cutting service.

3

trainmaster611 t1_ixdznwh wrote

In theory it's supposed to give "local control" over developments that occur in a neighborhood by proxy of their elected representative. In reality, it often becomes a mechanism by which NIMBYs can stop or stall development. In this case, it did end up getting positive concessions even if that's not what the CM was actually trying to accomplish. But that seems like an exception rather than the rule.

I tend to agree with you, consistent rules that both encourage development and bring the kinds of development people are interested in seeing should displace such a bureaucratic process.

1

trainmaster611 t1_ivz57cz wrote

Yeah the crews that put down white paint are completely different than the crews that put down all the other stuff. Their schedules aren't perfectly aligned so there's usually a short gap in completing the work.

Here's an example of the finished product.

https://maps.app.goo.gl/2Ty9cbiDHVhpjerSA

Also this thread is a perfect example of people thinking they're smarter than they actually are.

166