trainmaster611
trainmaster611 t1_jbjfy56 wrote
Reply to comment by curlycake in Upper West Side votes against proposed rest stop for delivery workers at 72nd Street by mowotlarx
And they're completely free to completely ignore you because they're not democratically elected officials.
trainmaster611 t1_j9wl2vz wrote
Reply to Madison Square Garden could move across street, executive tells Midtown neighbors by nickgarber
Article text please?
trainmaster611 t1_j7p9wdg wrote
Reply to Mysterious burning smell in UWS by teenyredbean
Apparently there's a five alarm fire in West New York, NJ that's burned multiple buildings. That's all I could find so that's most likely it. I can smell it on the UES also.
https://abc7ny.com/fire-west-ny-five-alarm-row-of-businesses/12785700/
trainmaster611 t1_j65jfx3 wrote
Reply to comment by HEIMDVLLR in Hamilton Ave in Red Hook, before and after the construction of the Gowanus Expressway and BQE in the 1940s-50s by TheSandPeople
Because construction costs are out of control. And also because NIMBYs can still stop projects via elected officials.
trainmaster611 t1_j5yz82v wrote
Reply to comment by CaptainKoconut in New York City Completes Construction on Latest American Transit Disaster by mowotlarx
Sure, it's not an end all be all and I'm not even saying I'm on board with the idea necessarily. I'm just taking issue with the idea that it would be a bunch of bureaucrats in a far off place that wouldn't know what's going on.
trainmaster611 t1_j5ywt3b wrote
Reply to comment by CaptainKoconut in New York City Completes Construction on Latest American Transit Disaster by mowotlarx
Who says they wouldn't be local people? The federal government already employs locally-focused community officials all over the country. They would just have the authority of the federal government.
trainmaster611 t1_ixdznwh wrote
Reply to comment by areYouMenthol in Won Greenlights 3,200-Unit Astoria Development, Paving Way for Council Approval by space_______kat
In theory it's supposed to give "local control" over developments that occur in a neighborhood by proxy of their elected representative. In reality, it often becomes a mechanism by which NIMBYs can stop or stall development. In this case, it did end up getting positive concessions even if that's not what the CM was actually trying to accomplish. But that seems like an exception rather than the rule.
I tend to agree with you, consistent rules that both encourage development and bring the kinds of development people are interested in seeing should displace such a bureaucratic process.
trainmaster611 t1_ivz57cz wrote
Reply to comment by doodle77 in DOT painted a parking spot in a crosswalk at 5th Ave & 10th St by nicwolff
Yeah the crews that put down white paint are completely different than the crews that put down all the other stuff. Their schedules aren't perfectly aligned so there's usually a short gap in completing the work.
Here's an example of the finished product.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/2Ty9cbiDHVhpjerSA
Also this thread is a perfect example of people thinking they're smarter than they actually are.
trainmaster611 t1_ivwgwog wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Exclusive: DOT eyes Brooklyn's Grand Army Plaza as NYC's next car-free space by alexd231232
Yeah, expanding roads always works. 🙄 We can look like Houston with freeways everywhere and still have traffic!
trainmaster611 t1_jcgf87v wrote
Reply to comment by b1argg in NY lawmakers say they won't support MTA's planned fare hike for commuters by King-of-New-York
I promise you that cutting MTA's budget won't magically cause it to reform by itself. The MTA needs major structural reform to address underlying structural issues, but that's a plodding years-long process with lots of political bargaining that needs to be driven by pols who are willing to take on a messy fight. Cutting the budget without reform in place is going to make MTA take the easy route to cutting costs: cutting service.