Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

HOARDING_STACKING t1_j91iqam wrote

You should cross post this on tool porn if you already haven't. Those are absolutely gorgeous!

190

OneFingerIn t1_j91ldvs wrote

I have no need for this, but I desperately want it.

11

miataturbo99 t1_j91lks3 wrote

This needs an NSFW tag for sure. Beautiful 🤌

4

ExHempKnight OP t1_j91ngk0 wrote

All the hardware for the stand is original, as far as I know. The wood slats are new, as the stand arrived to me in pretty sad shape. I stripped and repainted the cast iron frames, and polished the nameplate. The rubber bumpers between each mic were dried out and painted over, so I replaced them with pieces of rubber fuel hose.

11

FLTDI t1_j91pxbm wrote

What are the jaw sizes? Those are amazing

9

ExHempKnight OP t1_j91q8uy wrote

Thanks a lot! I'm just a basement-shop hobbyist... So I appreciate the compliment from someone who does machine work professionally.

The only thing I'm unable to do with these is properly lap the spindle and anvil faces. If I could do that, they'd be as good as, if not better than, new. But for my purposes, they work great as-is.

14

ExHempKnight OP t1_j91qkn2 wrote

Thanks! The set goes from 0-1" to 11-12", in one-inch increments. I've actually almost got a full set to 24", just don't have the stands for the larger ones. Hopefully one day...

9

GanderAtMyGoose t1_j91rfic wrote

What are the things stored at the bottom of the stand?

21

CR123CR123CR t1_j91s8d1 wrote

Original calibration gauges below as well? Those are very pretty tools

239

ExHempKnight OP t1_j91sxsw wrote

Thank you! I need to bring the standards to an instrument calibration place, and have them checked. I'm sure they're fine for my little hobby shop, but I'm kinda particular about that stuff.

173

ExHempKnight OP t1_j91tim3 wrote

Those are micrometer standards. They are used to calibrate the mics, to ensure accurate readings. Each mic has a corresponding standard... The 3" standard calibrates the 3-4" mic, and so on (the 0-1" mic calibrates on 0, so it doesn't have/need a standard) The plastic sleeves on each rod are to insulate them from the heat of your hand, which can throw off the calibration.

38

VisualKeiKei t1_j91x3ah wrote

As someone who has a retired $20k+ box full of Etalon, Tesa, Compac, and Interapid Swiss tools among other machining and metrology tools that are BIFL, I would want this awesome restored set with display rack instead.

38

Igoogledyourass t1_j92e1oq wrote

That set is incredibly nice. Good lord I've never even touched any nearly as big as some of those (that's what she never said).

2

hlvd t1_j92et16 wrote

Nice work 👌

1

shadowsong42 t1_j92fbc9 wrote

I keep forgetting that a micrometer is a measuring tool, and not a subdivided meter. Add in that I missed the "lived", and the first thing I thought was "how can one 0.1mm be longer than another?"

45

thewander t1_j92fd8w wrote

Just started a machining class. This comes at a great time where I understand more than I did. thank you

2

pgcooldad t1_j92l66u wrote

Bellissimo 👏👏👏!

Seriously, this is a very nice looking set.

1

ExHempKnight OP t1_j92m00q wrote

I'm sure they will, as well. But as old as they are, I'm sure they're a bit worn. I don't need them to be exact, I mostly need to know exactly how off they are, so I can compensate when I calibrate the mics.

20

ExHempKnight OP t1_j92m86d wrote

You're welcome!

I've thought about taking some classes in my spare time, fill in the gaps that the (probably thousands of) hours of machining YouTube I've watched have left in my knowledge.

2

bumgut t1_j92mnw1 wrote

Can i measure my penis with this?

0

ExHempKnight OP t1_j92o92l wrote

It really is. Since I've started this journey of precision work, I've really gained an appreciation for how important the tiniest of distances really are. And that everything is rubber.

66

ExHempKnight OP t1_j92ovww wrote

Lol I dunno about all that. These mics are good, but they're not Etalon good.

I do wish I had the equipment to lap the anvil/spindle faces. That's really the only thing stopping these from being truly good as new.

But, I suppose I need to be realistic. The mics only read to thousandths, and the tolerances required in my little hobby shop aren't aerospace-grade. Pretty sure they'll be perfectly fine as-is.

Doesn't stop me from wanting to, though...

21

A_Light_Spark t1_j92p8d4 wrote

Of course they are buy it for life.
They:

  • are made of metal
  • don't go under stress, i.e. heat/torque/compression
  • are not used outside
  • have no moving mechanism
  • have no electrical components
9

THE_CENTURION t1_j92q9rn wrote

I mean... That's a completely different kind of tool I don't know why you think that's applicable.

These kinds of standards can corrode and change or need to be re-lapped, or just wear. That doesn't ruin them, but you need to know how long they actually are so you can zero the micrometer correctly.

15

surfaholic15 t1_j92qht6 wrote

They are works of art. I have serious mic envy going on here.

1

ExHempKnight OP t1_j92qn5d wrote

Mostly true. The threads, spindle and spindle bushing, and (most importantly) the measuring faces, are all subject to wear and corrosion. This brand in particular compensates for thread wear in a unique (and in my opinion, superior) way, compared to Starrett or Mitutoyo. The bushings are also replaceable, which I'm not sure is an option with the other brands.

And as old as these mics are, and as much work as I've put into them... They can almost certainly benefit from having the faces lapped. That's really the only thing keeping them from being good as (or better than) new. But I don't have the equipment to do that, and having it done is not cheap (especially for as large a set as I have).

10

surfaholic15 t1_j92t6c6 wrote

Well if you get tired of your problem I will gladly shoulder the burden, free lol.

Frankly as far as I am concerned you would have a problem if you were tossing those in a drawer or leaving them out to rust rather than giving them the respect and care they merit.

2

surfaholic15 t1_j92uc1p wrote

I can't fathom folks that own precision instruments or truly beautiful tools and don't treat them well. Then again, I learned what woodworking skills I have using hundred years old tools, so that may bias my opinion.

It's like in our work. The disposable stuff from harbor freight gets cared for and not abused, but no extraordinary measures so to speak. Our precision tools get far more care.

You do beautiful work.

2

ExHempKnight OP t1_j92v6uc wrote

Yeah, it doesn't take much effort to keep things in good shape. But even that seems a tall order for some people. Especially if they're communal-use tools. There's a reason I have my own personal torque wrenches and other assorted calibrated tooling at my job (aircraft mechanic).

3

surfaholic15 t1_j92z2wk wrote

Yep, whenever hubby is working with anyone I look at how they keep their tools. If I see precision things mishandled I give him a heads up so he knows to keep an eye on his good tools if he has to use them lol.

He recently helped a friend rebuild a CAT excavator engine. That buddy of his is really professional. Tables laid out, tools and parts organized at all times, everything carefully cleaned and repainted before reassembly. It was a joy to see them doing the job right :-). Winter is equipment maintenance season.

2

TheMooJuice t1_j9302el wrote

How specifically does this brand compensate for thread wear?

Also what kind of hobbies do you have which utilise these? I have read all your other replies however am unfamiliar with much of the terminology unfortunately

3

HipsterGalt t1_j932nzn wrote

I swear we'll machine our way to accidentally splitting an atom one day, purely out of that desire to chase 0. Gorgeous mics though and I'm with the original commentor, I'd pay heaps for a set like this. Though I've yet to do so for those Tesa indexable calipers. One day.

8

ExHempKnight OP t1_j936wep wrote

Mostly, measuring instruments like this are used in precision machining. Metalworking lathes, milling machines... Stuff like that. I have a small hobby shop in my basement with a lathe, a mill, and a couple of other machines.

Machining in and of itself is a big part of my hobby, but it also supports basically all the other things I'm interested in. I've designed and machined a custom hotend for my 3d printer. I've machined mounts and pulleys to mount a supercharger on my mid-90s Saturn. Brackets for valves on my beer brewing rig. Custom feet for my bed, which house scales, which I use to tell my home automation system when I'm in bed. I could go on.

As for the thread wear compensation... I'll preface this by saying that Starrett and Mitutoyo are fine instruments, have been around for a long time, and are basically industry standard as far as I know. Thread wear in a micrometer is not a huge issue, and plenty of those mics are still kicking, and still accurate, with decades on the clock.

So, quick and dirty micrometer terminology:

  • Thimble: the part you actually turn with your fingers.
  • Spindle: rod that sticks out of the of the thimble. Has external threads on the end inside the thimble, the other end is a very flat face, which is one half of the measuring surfaces
  • Barrel: cylindrical part of the micrometer frame, has internal threads that the spindle screws into
  • Frame: the main body of the instrument.
  • Anvil: sits in the frame, directly opposite the spindle. This is the other half of the flad measuring surfaces.

Starrett and Mitutoyo compensate for thread wear using a tapered, threaded collar at the far end of the barrel. There's slits in the end where the anvil screws in, and the tapered thread is on the outside. As you tighten the collar, it squeezes those slits smaller, which tightens the internal threads.

The problem with that, is it's only those first couple of threads that are taking up the slack.

The Slocomb micrometers use a 2-piece threaded portion. The 2 pieces have serrations that mesh. If the thread wears, you simply tighten the outer collar one or two serrations, and all the slack is gone. The difference here is that by clocking the threads differently, it causes all the threads to be engaged, rather than just a few at the very end.

This distributes the wear over more surface area, which will make it wear slower. Plus, you can clock the threads infinitely, whereas you can only tighten a tapered collar so much.

8

ExHempKnight OP t1_j9384jw wrote

Lol relax! This is my basement shop. The walls don't need to be pretty.

As for the granite... That's the most important thing in my shop. It's called a surface plate, and it's flat. Very, very flat. The difference between the highest and lowest points, over the entire 12"x18" surface, is less than 0.0002".

A surface plate is the reference for the entire shop. Using various instruments, I can use the plate to tell if a part I made is flat, if opposite faces are parallel, or if perpendicular faces are, in fact, perfectly square. I can measure the height of objects relative to one another. I can use it to make other things flat, and then use those things to check the flatness of other things, such as the sliding surfaces between different moving parts of a machine.

Mine is a relatively small surface plate. They can get downright huge. 10, 20 feet long, and 1-2 feet thick. And bigger.

4

ExHempKnight OP t1_j938bao wrote

Been into machining a long time. Subscribed to a couple dozen different machining channels.

Check out Clickspring. His clock-making series is amazing, even if you're not into machining.

3

ExHempKnight OP t1_j9393g3 wrote

They're honestly not hard to restore... Disassemble, clean, strip paint, re-enamel the engravings, mask, paint, reassemble with a drop of appropriate oil, calibrate. Just takes patience and attention to detail.

There's probably around $500 in all this. Plus a couple hundred of hours of my own work.

6

ExHempKnight OP t1_j93adnm wrote

Everything is flexible, to some degree. Drop a feather onto a pool table, and the weight of that feather will bend the slate of the pool table. It's a tiny, tiny, TINY amount, but given appropriately sensitive equipment, you will find that there's a deflection.

When you're measuring down to 3, 4, or especially 5 decimal places, even the heat of your breath can distort a part a measureable amount.

Robin Renzetti has a great demonstration of this, if you're curious. Skip to 31:00 for the relevant part.

90

luedriver t1_j93bh50 wrote

I got confused and wanted to know what kind of mic rophones these were

1

Lampshader t1_j93bwfk wrote

If you use English spelling, the terms are distinct:

Micrometre: one millionth of a metre

Micrometer: tool to accurately measure small distances

Americans spell the unit of measurement as "meter" though, presumably as part of their quest to sabotage the metric system (or should that be meteric system?)

22

alittlebitaspie t1_j93gdlc wrote

Hopefully those will pass calibration and inspection. they look to be in flawless condition, so hopefully they will and will be more than a pretty display.

2

nicaldrogo t1_j93lqd1 wrote

I think you misunderstood me. You mentioned that you could use the end standards to calibrate the mics. All that does is set the zero on the mic itself. Calibrating a mic consists of checking for linearity, flatness, and parallelism. Like you mentioned, it won't matter for your use.

3

zyzzogeton t1_j93of6q wrote

Adam Savage has some interesting discussions about his journey towards precision. Pask has a similar kind of arc as well on his channel. The hallmark of craftsmen is that their tastes become more and more exacting over time. The tools needed to accomplish that become more and more specialized and beautiful too.

17

mmoolloo t1_j93uelu wrote

Have you seen Adam Savage's restoration video of his set of micrometers and case? I'm no machinist, but I'd love to have a set like that just to admire the craftsmanship.

1

Optimistic__Elephant t1_j93uhln wrote

I just meant in general English has lots of weird rules like:

> I before e, except after c Or when sounded as 'a' as in 'neighbor' and 'weigh' Unless the 'c' is part of a 'sh' sound as in 'glacier' Or it appears in comparatives and superlatives like 'fancier' And also except when the vowels are sounded as 'e' as in 'seize' Or 'i' as in 'height' Or also in '-ing' inflections ending in '-e' as in 'cueing' Or in compound words as in 'albeit' Or occasionally in technical words with strong etymological links to their parent languages as in 'cuneiform' Or in other numerous and random exceptions such as 'science', 'forfeit', and 'weird'.

Which is funny because metric system is all about logical and consistent rules. So metric + English language is a funny pairing to me.

5

ExHempKnight OP t1_j93xjbe wrote

It's an instrument used to measure very precisely, down to 3, or even 4 decimal places of accuracy. Used mostly in machining and/or metal work.

Each micrometer only has one inch of range, 0-1", 1-2", etc.. The set I've posted measures to 12", so there's 11 mics total.

25

ExHempKnight OP t1_j942yaa wrote

Fair points. If I understand correctly, the measuring faces are checked using a set of optical flats, each a slightly different length, to check for parallelism at different rotational positions of the spindle, right?

4

RDandersen t1_j9442ro wrote

I don't know why, but somehow it looks like the stand and tools were about 6 foot tall and standing on the floor. Something about the angle maybe?
Nice megameters, if that is the case.

1

ExHempKnight OP t1_j94an9t wrote

Thanks a lot!

I've got a Slocomb catalog from the early 1900s, and it actually says oak. Thankfully, my coworker had some scrap pieces that fit the bill perfectly. Couple of coats of polyurethane, and done!

1

ExHempKnight OP t1_j94fhq3 wrote

Those are standards. They're rods of a calibrated length, used to adjust each mic to zero. Each micrometer has a corresponding standard rod. The black plastic sleeves on each one serve to insulate them from the heat of your hand, which can cause the standard to expand, thus no longer be exact.

13

Karimura12 t1_j94k2iw wrote

Vernier mics? Give me digital or give me death, nobody got time to read all those tiny lines lol. Cool collection! Can’t imagine having to use those larger ones, thank god for CMMs and vision systems

1

VisualKeiKei t1_j94k8ac wrote

Your effort and care in the resto definitely shows and the display rack is just awesome. It's way more impressive than all my gear stuffed into a boring brown Kennedy roller. Even a person not familiar with these tools would have the impression they're something special and they're more than sufficient for the home gamer.

I see century-old Starrett and B&S micrometers all the time on eBay and it would be neat to collect and restore a set one day.

1

ExHempKnight OP t1_j94kb43 wrote

I've got a couple of digital mics, as well as some digital calipers, which see use in my basement shop.

Yeah, even simply zeroing the big boys using the standard rods is challenging. Especially the 22-23" I've got.

1

Robobvious t1_j94mjc4 wrote

Neat! What do you build that needs such exacting measurements?

1

ExHempKnight OP t1_j94na3q wrote

Things. And also, stuff.

In all seriousness, I make all kinds of things. Brackets and idler pullies to install a supercharger in my mid-90s Saturn. Valve brackets for my beer brewing rig. A replacement part for a very expensive pen (<-- shameless plug for my YT channel).

I'm currently building a 3D printer, and I'm using some of the larger mics to make sure the frame is parallel and perpendicular where it needs to be. I've also designed and machined my own custom hotend.

Sometimes it feels like I'm mostly using my machines to make parts to modify/improve each other. But it's still a lot of fun.

1

pastafaz t1_j94qolk wrote

Man you have to post this on r/machining or machinists if you haven’t already.

1

SheepdogApproved t1_j94qp7k wrote

Are these the same ones Adam savage restored a case for? Looks great!

1

stlblues310 t1_j94x9dw wrote

Should make all your screws align straight up and down (or horizontal, dealers choice) to fit the precision theme

1

Trewarin t1_j95bxes wrote

The skookum Subreddit would like this too.

1

rockerscott t1_j95qmw8 wrote

At what point should they be called MACROmeters

1

Tawmcruize t1_j95t1i1 wrote

As a quality tech who calibrates micrometers often, if you have any that seem to not center very well ( you get a measurement but a little more force changes it by a tenth or so) you more than likely have a burr or foreign material on edge of the faces and a really smooth stone should be able to take it off, this is what I think I used for a v mic that had rust on the carbide faces and it checks gauge pins to tenths still.

3

ExHempKnight OP t1_j99ju71 wrote

Thank you! I was pretty excited to find it. I've seen the stand in the Slocomb catalog I've got from the 1920s, but I never expected to actually see one.

It was pretty ratty when I got it, but I'm pretty chuffed with how it turned out.

1