Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

t1_iz4hoz5 wrote

All financial transactions must be in cash. Shopping, paychecks, rent, taxes, everything. Effective immediately.

4

t1_iz4pbet wrote

Nah. Checks. And you can’t start writing until the transaction is complete.

3

t1_iz4qu4g wrote

MBTA only accepts checks, T pass is considered an illegal form of currency.

1

t1_iz4mnj8 wrote

I’ll be honest; I don’t see the issue here………other than having to pay for taxes and rent.

Oh, yeah. And the paychecks, or taking the Amtrak. Or buying a new house.

General shopping isn’t too bad, but……okay, maybe there are a few issues. But there’s some about handling hard cash that can’t be replicated with a dinky plastic card when making a purchase.

0

t1_iz4lzby wrote

Outlawing/closing down all the Dunks would probably do the trick.

3

t1_iz3n93x wrote

reverse the rotary right of way, make it dumb like NH (or some other new england state can't remember)

2

t1_iz6sv2s wrote

I think there’s a rotary in like East Longmeadow or some town like that which has a reversed right of way

1

t1_iz3n28y wrote

Revamp all bureaucratic processes to involve several minor and completely unnecessary steps that add a minor level of complication.

1

t1_iz4ccpj wrote

Announce that we will be pouring additional funding in to the MBTA solely for the purposes of rebranding (like when UNH spent the equivalent of a typical yearly salary to make their logo dull, only on a much larger scale).

1

t1_iz4jh6g wrote

All restaurant food and beverages must be consumed on the premises. No takeout, delivery or drive-thru for you.

1

t1_iz4tyzo wrote

Make them renew their IDs in person, forms must be filled out in person.

1

t1_iz4v35j wrote

Bring back toll booths on the pike.

1

t1_iz6811m wrote

Ban all things “pumpkin” in the fall.

1

t1_iz6k0ft wrote

Change the income tax to a flat rate tax based on gross income with no credits, deductions, etc.

1

t1_iz3k3oh wrote

Tell them the truth for once. People like hearing the lies from politicians.

0

t1_iz3nc7s wrote

Give the people freedom of speech.

−8

t1_iz4ophg wrote

I'm going to wager that nobody from the government has ever stopped you from saying anything.

8

t1_iz4v30d wrote

You would win your bet because I’m not that “important” but I have seen plenty of people censored for political views on the various platforms.

−5

t1_iz50w7j wrote

Which "platforms" are owned by the government?

As a reminder, the First Amendment states:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech..."

So, unless Congress is responsible for passing legislation that is de-platforming people, then your issue is with private companies.

6

t1_iz51hsm wrote

None are “owned” by the Gov but colluding with big tech platforms to censor speech is pretty much the same thing.

I disagree, my issue with with Gov collusion with platforms to do their dirty work.

−5

t1_iz5260l wrote

[deleted]

5

t1_iz52rcm wrote

You wouldn’t read it if I did. Besides, what one person thinks is credible and concrete, another will think it is garbage.

There are plenty of info out there if you just look.

1

t1_iz52xm4 wrote

[deleted]

3

t1_iz5cf2t wrote

Sure. I would honestly like to hear you opinion on Taibbi’s Twitter leak from Dec… https://mobile.twitter.com/mtaibbi/

1

t1_iz5f216 wrote

[deleted]

3

t1_iz5h0ik wrote

Your comment clearly shows that you didn’t read the info. No one give two craps about a crackhead’s dick.

This info was from the depths of the Twitter closets and was uncovered after Elon started looking into it. Don’t worry though, this info is not something that you would be interested in. Please ignore.

1

t1_iz51rf1 wrote

So you were one of the people who were mad about not seeing Hunter Biden's dick pics?

3

t1_iz520yw wrote

I see my comment about giving people the freedom of speech is triggering some folks. Interesting because people in Massachusetts were supposed to be so tolerant and accepting. I suppose free speech is only acceptable when it supports one side?

−1

t1_iz56w9q wrote

[deleted]

5

t1_iz58ej8 wrote

If you think I’m upset, you are wrong. I’m just sharing what I think. Or is this not ok? Who would have thought saying that people should have the freedom speech would trigger so many people. Jeesh.

0