Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

ripper522 t1_j9u4ngh wrote

this. he's vetoed weed bills in the past, I see no reason to believe he wouldn't if it got through both the state house and senate. it's crazy, the amount of money we are losing as a state to MA and ME along the border.

7

Novasadog t1_j9u5q19 wrote

The Democrats in nh, DO NOT WANT, legislation. If they did, Maggie Hassan would have approved it

0

CLS4L t1_j9u6a6i wrote

Republicans love the pill lobby. Hows that freedom making out

−3

cwalton505 t1_j9u6q9c wrote

Why are people still just finding out about this and making a new post every day is my question

53

warren_stupidity t1_j9u8pa3 wrote

Because we decided that, with respect to weed, you have to be dying to live free.

21

valleyman02 t1_j9u9c7u wrote

Well you're right. Citizens United made corporations people too. Which legalized bribery by corporations. Honestly you can't even blame the individual member. The system is rip for corruption. Then one person comes and shows everybody you can grift and there's few if any consequences.

And presto United States of America Inc™

4

danmac1152 t1_j9uab05 wrote

Both make sense really. Ignorance and the monopoly thing. Especially when you look at how adamant a lot of our state gov seems to be about home cultivation. Do I believe that they actually believe the hippie guy with 6 plants in his basement could be the next El Chapo? Yes. Do I believe that they don’t want people to grow because it might hinder their state income? Yes. We need people who are more with the current world in our government

8

Some_Ride1014 t1_j9uq7rk wrote

Republicans don’t want Americans to feel good.

0

Undaedalus t1_j9uvjhb wrote

Because people keep voting for a MAGA governor because 40 years ago they liked his dad.

−3

slimyprincelimey t1_j9uzh4c wrote

Drive fucking 23 minutes and buy it in one of the other states and stop posting this.

2

OrangeLoco t1_j9uzwo1 wrote

Their motto is Live Free or Die, not Live Free and get High.

−2

Bigfatsmelly t1_j9v0sdk wrote

So many comments blaming each side but no one giving any actual insight. So I guess I'll give some actual insight on the matter.

Now this may be a bit out dated, but back when weed was decriminalized (to some degree), the main reason for it not being fully legal was due to the NH gun laws. This is some info that came out back in 2017 so some new research on DEFINITELY needed, but it's better then the other comments blaming each side (which I for one find hilarious and scary because it shows how uneducated people can be).

Again from back in 2017:

"The department issued the order because federal law prohibits anyone who uses illegal substances from owning a firearm, and—so far as the federal government is concerned—marijuana is still a controlled drug. That means medical marijuana users who own firearms are technically in violation of federal gun laws."

Please correct/update this if anything changed and hopefully this was more helpful than the typical BS that the people actually involved in policts like to spew.

3

GeeForSocks t1_j9v3j3s wrote

So, NH state government is protecting us, its citizens, from the federal government coming after our guns on the pretense of our recreational weed usage?

There are plenty of gun valuing states who have legalized recreational weed and I've not heard of any indication that the feds have been using this pretense to snatch people's guns.

I know you're not making this argument, just reporting it, but it's not very convincing with light shining on it. Hell, even in 2017 there were enough states regulating legal weed to understand that the federal government had been taking a handsoff approach with respect to the issue.

11

Bigfatsmelly t1_j9v4lsz wrote

>There are plenty of gun valuing states who have legalized recreational weed and I've not heard of any indication that the feds have been using this pretense to snatch people's guns.

That's what I always thought of too, but I'm sure it really comes down to the votes from who we put in the positions of power. The gun laws were always the reason I heard of for weed still being illegal in NH. It sounds like they're in the works of passing a bill now to make it legal recreationally. I mostly just wanted to give some actual information on this in comparison to what 90% of other comments were stating.

3

photostrat t1_j9v7sky wrote

It if was deadly to ourselves or dangerous to those around us, we'd have made it part of or identities and enshrined it to law years ago.

Correct me with actual facts if I'm wrong, but that's all Live Free or Die means in this state.

Population older than usual. Northeast laws in general still crippled by old puritan thinking, although the more liberal states nearby have seemed to move past that to their benifit little by little.

0

photostrat t1_j9v8kig wrote

Because the population overwhelming wants it legal while the governor/boot lickers don't agree that we should have the same personal choices residents of other NE states get to make.

9

YBMExile t1_j9vc9e1 wrote

Because that would accept that things can and should change based on the views of the citizens of the state of NH. Isn’t the ethos here on this sub that things should never, ever change? If it’s good enough for MASSACHUSETTS and the rest of the country, we really shouldn’t do that here, right?

−1

WMDLaotian t1_j9vcbo5 wrote

Me being ignorant to NH laws, but I figured it’s because there isn’t a state tax much like can deposits. So because they can’t put a state tax on weed, they don’t bother?

3

warren_stupidity t1_j9vdkg7 wrote

I agree that her cautious centrism is awful, and she did in fact veto pot. So what about Hassan when Sununu is slammed is a fair criticism. But the ‘can’t legalize because liquor stores’ is just made up nonsense.

1

LexExpress666 t1_j9vn01n wrote

because the people there care more about not having to wear a motorcycle helmet than they do about legalizing weed.

−1

lives4summits t1_j9vng0r wrote

Why does it still recognize the federal minimum wage of $7.25? Why doesn’t it require seatbelts while driving? Why isn’t there a sales or income tax to fund its crumbling infrastructure and provide a higher standard of living.

Selfishness, greed, and ignorance.

−2

Raa03842 t1_j9vqgjn wrote

Same reason they don’t require seatbelts. Wait what? Oh yeah live free or die when it comes to seatbelts but the right wing wants to control what you can do with your body. Smh

4

Azr431 t1_j9vsanh wrote

We’re the only purple state in New England where Republicans still have power. Also, we don’t have initiatives at our disposal for direct legislation bypassing the dinosaurs in Concord. The initiative is how Maine got cannabis under the fascist LePage. The lack of the initiative in NH is honestly our biggest weakness as a state. It keeps those out of touch in check.

3

greenglasstree t1_j9vwsm0 wrote

For the same reason the min wage is still $7.25 and you can't get good specialists for rare diseases here.

New Hampshire is like a father who does no childcare because he knows the mother will do it.

Many New Hampshirites don't care because they can get higher paying jobs, legal marijuana, and apppointments with rare disease doctors in nearby places.

10

BigRockFarm t1_j9vxvtv wrote

Yup. It’s one of the only things that government seems to do efficiently and it helps reduce the need for more taxes

It’s cheaper than most privately owned liquor stores in neighboring states too

18

CDogNH t1_j9w1h1t wrote

So that we get the pleasure of potheads whining incessantly about it. And we are never disappointed.

0

Griddler t1_j9w50h9 wrote

It's mostly because it is a conservative state.

Of course, they're mixed with Democrats and Republicans, but in the state of New Hampshire they hold the line.

I'm sure it will change in the future to allow marijuana.

Incremental change is always best. The impetuous ones lead us into a path of destruction.

0

Plenty-Bit2029 t1_j9w9c36 wrote

Same as alcohol, if your life isn't good without it, it will be worse with it!!!!

0

UncleRicosWig t1_j9w9gbn wrote

Not mine. The state makes so much money from liquor sales. I think it’s why NH can get away with having no income or sales tax, and still have better plowed roads then Maine, which has both. I can see why NH trying to replicate that model for weed. Just taking them to dam long

12

jdkeith t1_j9wcqha wrote

> Either the fed would sue NH (and obviously win)

Only because of Fed courts which have made things up out of nowhere (cough cough Wickard v Filburn). NH should just tell them to pound sand.

4

gvuio t1_j9wfu21 wrote

The legislature, who are aged from 60-80 years old, have framed their opinions on pot use by watching the movie “Reefer Madness”

5

juicebronston t1_j9wkmfy wrote

Maggie Hassan has nothing to do with the fact that in 2023, the majority of NH citizens want recreational marijuana legalized. Also worth mentioning that Democrats and Democrat voters have been crucial in the legalization process in most legal recreational states.

1

Ok_Nobody4967 t1_j9wkxzi wrote

The NH gop has been voting against it right along. I think they are under the influence of Nancy Reagan’s anti drug campaign.

1

Elpundit t1_j9wnpf3 wrote

There are a lot of reasons why New Hampshire is better off fiscally than other places, liquor is just one. Having the fourth largest lower house legislature in the English-speaking world, creates its own citizen rule dynamic. They get paid almost nothing, except for the miles they drive. Either highly motivated young people, or retired people with nothing better to do.

5

Thundersnow999 t1_j9wom7t wrote

Because the overwhelming majority of people who make the laws and really vote on things here are OLD and way out of touch. The majority of people who vote in state elections are older and they are the ones bending the ear of their local representatives who are always looking to appease the voters who keep them in office.

1

jackiemoons t1_j9wqofv wrote

Can people use the search bar to find previous discussions on this topic? I am pro legislation but enough. Do your research and go to another state to buy weed, grow your own or use the black market. This conversation is just like beating a dead horse at this point. It's decriminalized so just be ok with that for now or waste your time and write our governor a letter.

7

NewPhoenix77 t1_j9wqp29 wrote

Some shits weird. Don’t have to wear a basic safety precaution like a motorcycle helmet or seatbelt. But don’t smoke that jibba jabba.

2

Different_Ad7655 t1_j9wxwrg wrote

The same reason we don't have a bottle bill, an obvious recycling measure that works.. go figure..

1

SheeEttin t1_j9wz2e7 wrote

And great selection! Liquor stores in MA are tiny and have shit stock. It's always the same Jameson, Captain Morgan, Svedka, and so on. Nothing interesting.

Honestly, liquor should just be sold in grocery stores like other states. It's not an issue. Let there be specialty stores too.

4

DiBello44 t1_j9x2yra wrote

Our Republican Governor wants to be President

1

UnfairAd7220 t1_j9x36ee wrote

Because the potheads that demand pot are annoying.

0

mtn970 t1_j9x8hy6 wrote

Live free OR high, but not both. . .

1

[deleted] t1_j9x8p36 wrote

To be fair, none of those things should be regulated. I cant think of more victimless crimes than,not wearing a seatbelt or helmet (I think that’s a dumb idea) or smoking the devils lettuce. Educate people and let Darwin do his thing.

3

srosorcxisto t1_j9xa2z0 wrote

Greed. Politicians see it as a potential revenue source instead of as a freedom. They can't sell it in state limo stores as long as it is scheduled and would rather lock up their own citizens for a plant than let the legal private market have access.

1

stalence9 t1_j9xcna8 wrote

I dunno about right wingers. I do know Biden and the democrats missed out on an easy W when their popularity was waning before Ukraine and post lock downs / post Afghanistan before the midterms. They held the presidency and both houses of Congress. They could have legalized weed if they wanted too.

7

Acon9263 t1_j9xebbe wrote

Not very far of a drive in any direction.

1

Consistent_Tower_973 t1_j9xevrm wrote

This!! If NH were isolated, it would be ranked extremely poorly by the vast majority of metrics. The only reason we do so well on so many metrics is because of the opportunities, talent, and services offered within our region. Without the opportunities afforded by neighbouring jurisdictions and their well-paid workers travelling to NH, we would be far worse off. Sadly, rather than actually improving NH to be strong on its own as well as benefitting from the region, many Granite Staters are content with the easy route of relying on our neighbours to fuel the state.

8

cat-gun t1_j9xw19f wrote

The House has passed numerous bills legalizing recreational weed. However, until recently, drug war enthusiasts in the Senate have killed the bills.

For example, here are the Senators who voted against the last bill to legalize weed in the Senate, NH SB299 on 2022-05-12:

Sen. Avard, Kevin A. [R]
Sen. Birdsell, Regina [R]
Sen. Bradley, Jeb [R]
Sen. Carson, Sharon [R]
Sen. Cavanaugh, Kevin J. [D] --> Sen. Keith Murphy, R-Manchester
Sen. D'Allesandro, Lou C. [D]
Sen. Daniels, Gary L. [R] --> Sen. Shannon Chandley, D-Amherst
Sen. Gannon, William "Bill" M. [R]
Sen. Giuda, Robert "Bob" [R] --> Sen. Tim Lang, R-Sanbornton
Sen. Gray, James [R]
Sen. Hennessey, Erin Tapper [R]
Sen. Morse, Charles "Chuck" W. [R] --> Sen. Daryl Abbas, R-Salem
Sen. Ricciardi, Denise [R]
Sen. Soucy, Donna M. [D]
Sen. Ward, Ruth B. [R]
Sen. Whitley, Becky [D]

In the last election, four of the Senators who voted against legalization were replaced by pro-legalization Senators. So, the pro side now has enough votes to pass the Senate.

However, there are still not enough votes (2/3 majority) to override the veto of Governor Sununu. Sununu has indicated that he will not sign off on new legalization bills. That said, he's gearing up to make a run for President, and may not want to take an unpopular position on legal weed (74% of NH voters support legalization).

If you support legal weed, consider contacting your senator and the governor's office, and let your support for legal weed be known.

1

deltapapa1 t1_j9xzrpi wrote

I just stop in Portland when I’m over that way. #seaweed

1

Halfameetball t1_j9y4z6w wrote

I'm okay with it. It gives them enormous buying power which gives us the best possible price. That's why we are so much lower than surrounding states. New Hampshire is the single largest contract for any distributor in the Northeast.

4

doobie042 t1_j9y82xt wrote

Maggie Hassan vetoed it multiple times and Sunnuno didn't get a bill he liked.

1

doobie042 t1_j9y8cqm wrote

All politician 's just want to have the other party in their way so they can blame them. The left will try to push Marijuana legalization and if enough Republicans are against it they'll blame Republicans. Even though they could have done it a year ago. Same with decriminalization of all non violent drug 'crimes. Heck the left are the ones who really worked ri Crack down on them in the 80s and 90s.

6

PrimeTime1976 t1_j9y8dc1 wrote

450 members in our HoR and we are surprised that we can’t get anything done? Have you ever tried to figure out where to go to dinner with a family of 5?

1

Kikutwo t1_j9y93ar wrote

Ancient Cretans in charge.

1

ndarchi t1_j9ycpjt wrote

Pray tell how would they get past the 60 vote threshold in the senate? It’s really amazing to me that this fact flys over peoples head, they just blame the president when really it’s an over used filibuster. Change the filibuster rule to a standing/talking one and then congress is forced to actually legislate instead of stick their thumbs up their collective asses and only vote on pidly things/spending bills.

I guess you could possibly have put it in a spending bill that had to pass but to my knowledge it has to be legislation to legalize weed not just a DEA reclassification.

1

KarlLexington t1_j9yj9g9 wrote

That simply is not true. There was a one bill last year to do that, the first time that idea has ever been proposed, but it was rejected. That whole idea is pretty much dead. The current legislation (HB 593) is a more conventional approach similar to what other states have done.

0

Alert_Salt7048 t1_j9yk9gt wrote

Because they don’t want to stink like the neighbors.

1

dc551589 t1_j9ykife wrote

For the last bit I’d say it’s more “rich, out of touch kids who don’t need to have an income to survive, and out of touch old people afraid of progress.” Not that there isn’t always some in between but I don’t see many middle age average working folks represented because they simply can’t afford to be a legislator.

4

devildogmillman t1_j9ykz9e wrote

I mean… has it being illegal ever stopped anyone from doing it here? Its not like NYC or Chicago where the cops really did kind of declare war on… well less on drugs and more just the community.

0

SquashDue502 t1_j9ymkxo wrote

I get that it’s illegal and therefore if a job wants to drug test you for it you could be fired but I feel like NH is a small enough state that you’re never really TOO far from someplace that it’s legal to purchase 😂

Like at least it’s not Texas lmao

1

GeeForSocks t1_ja0i9sh wrote

Looks like yes? I'll admit I'd never heard of this person before you mentioned them. I guess Georgia having not legalized recreational weed didn't really help him out. He may have even been better off had it been legal in the state at the time, though of course I'm just speculating about that.

1

wiredentropy t1_ja6fnu5 wrote

Because we are smart enough to know the damage it does to the human body

1