Submitted by AuthorSnow t3_103exna in newhampshire
ZacPetkanas t1_j2yowtl wrote
> On Dec. 23, Rep. Rep. Kristina Schultz (D), Rep. Matthew Santonastaso (R), and Rep. Glenn Bailey (R) prefiled House Bill 135 (HB135) for introduction in the 2023 legislative session. The legislation would ban New Hampshire law enforcement officers from seeking, executing, or participating in “no-knock” warrant.
Good, they should be ended.
No knocks are a coping mechanism for lazy police work.
kodiakbear_ t1_j2zapfk wrote
Not to mention unconstitutional
AuthorSnow OP t1_j2zhhre wrote
Correct me if I’m wrong, didn’t SCOTUS say they were constitutional? Don’t get wrong, I think this is incorrect but isn’t that the ruling nonetheless?
DemonDuo t1_j2zmdqs wrote
SCOTUS.. More like SCROTUM
kodiakbear_ t1_j2zw4d4 wrote
Got me good haha
FrostGamezzTV t1_j34e95a wrote
Got em
GreatGrandaddyPurp t1_j3191ei wrote
The SCOTUS has frequently ruled that the constitution is made of toilet paper
FrostGamezzTV t1_j34ec8i wrote
Oh so they're the last to have a say in what the constitution means.
Alex_2259 t1_j31i2cu wrote
Except when it benefits the people you expect it to, think Citizens divided (Citizens United ruling)
lendluke t1_j31ggyt wrote
Also, SCOTUS is never granted the power to rule on constitutionality in the constitution (not that I think it has been a net negative to have some body rule on constitutionality, even watered down version).
NHBikerHiker t1_j30hrfw wrote
Late 90s court case — yes, no knock warrants are constitutional. It was a unanimous decision, btw.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments