Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

SprinklesCurrent8332 t1_jd43htp wrote

Paying teachers a 'living wage' shouldn't require a strike.

256

AurelianoTampa t1_jd46y9q wrote

The strike here isn't about paying teachers. It's a strike by service workers - cafeteria workers, bus drivers, custodians and special education assistants - for their wages to be increased. Teachers are striking in solidarity, but not for their own wages.

I think that the service workers deserve to be paid a living wage as well, but it's not correct to call this a strike to get teachers paid a living wage.

320

BrotherRoga t1_jd4ajfo wrote

>Teachers are striking in solidarity, but not for their own wages.

Though while we're at it...

88

SprinklesCurrent8332 t1_jd47wh1 wrote

Ok, thank you for your correction. Reading into more, they are asking for a 30% raise across the board. Maybe my comment would have been more correct if I had said, "school workers shouldn't have to strike for a 'living wage'.

51

pomonamike t1_jd4d1xq wrote

Not even a “living wage” the classified workers want to raise the minimum pay from $25k to $36k. $3000 a month isn’t living anywhere near LA. Good for my fellow teachers supporting these essential workers.

78

tbarr1991 t1_jd8gajb wrote

It aint even that after taxes either. Especially in cali. 36k in cali is laughable at best.

1

Darth_Meowth t1_jd506v6 wrote

For one this is not about teachers but support staff.

Second they are part time so the “living wage” Bernie Sanders crap you want to say is for part time employees.

−45

DireBare t1_jd54ufz wrote

I hope you are not a reading comprehension teacher . . . .

19

Darth_Meowth t1_jd57cu6 wrote

Nope. I am not a teacher nor do I care about my spelling or grammar on Reddit.

−34

richal t1_jd6jrks wrote

Nor understanding the meaning of "reading comprehension" for that matter. Hint: it has little to do with spelling or grammar.

7

pomonamike t1_jd54v65 wrote

>For one this is not about teachers

Who said it was? My comment directly states it’s about classified workers. Teachers are striking alongside them to show support. Second, not all of them are part time. These are some of the hardest working people I have had the honor of working alongside.

Sorry you are so bitter against working people. A very quick glance at your post history tells me you may want to spend a little less time obsessing over meme stocks and a little more time in self-reflection.

15

Epstein_Bros_Bagels t1_jd4ut8o wrote

Yeah I was a para last year and the wage really is shit. Mind you, I worked in a good district for teacher pay. I was making 19k last year, so I worked at Kroger's on the weekends. What's absolutely soul crushing is I knew students working in retail stores that made more than me. Heck one student worked at the same grocery store I worked at. Some classes I was pretty much teaching the content and at least once a week I was a substitute despite not getting the pay

47

NATIVE_COWBOY t1_jd6nsl4 wrote

$19k/year as a para is disgustingly low for what it entails.

11

DirtyDracula t1_jdamtsp wrote

I feel your pain. I was paid $17.50 an hour to be bitten, punched in the head, kicked, attacked with scissors, dodge thrown chairs, all while kept working right below the legal limit at which they'd have to pay me any kind of benefits. The only reason it worked out is because I was living at home at the time and could walk, no need to pay for a car or gas.

1

moddestmouse t1_jd493ji wrote

Teachers in LAUSD make on average nearly 70k and with benefits it’s almost 100k.

This strike is for staff at schools, not teachers.

31

RubberPny t1_jd49kub wrote

Yep. There are a lot of employees like janitors that make under $30k/yr for example, in one of the most expensive places in the country. Even with roommates it would be near impossible to scrape by on that amount.

36

kaptainkeel t1_jd50rty wrote

I can't imagine living in LA on $60k/year. $30k I'd just assume is living with parents, 4 other roommates in a tiny house, or they are just supplementing while their partner is the breadwinner. Oof.

13

SuspiciousBroccoli43 t1_jd6e5m0 wrote

Lived in the Bay Area 20 years ago making $65k and still had to have roommates. I wasn't even in close the city too.

4

Nick_Full_Time t1_jd58afr wrote

Their salary schedule is incredibly complicated to read, but nonetheless, the beginning salary there is 56K for a first year teacher, and that’s actually pretty low for a California. My district pays more than that for non-credentialed interns. Starting salary in my middle of nowhere district is 65K.

2

[deleted] t1_jd49v2u wrote

[deleted]

−2

Wanna_Know_More t1_jd4cgs8 wrote

70K plus full benefits is perfectly liveable for LA. Teachers with more years under their belt are clearing $100K.

Source: I live in LA

9

moddestmouse t1_jd4ahtw wrote

Getting nearly 100k in compensation in LA is above median salary. We can woe is me teachers in most districts but LAUSD is not one of them.

8

Office_Sadist t1_jd4n1va wrote

$70k in Los Angeles is double the median income. Its right on par with the household income median.

2

[deleted] t1_jd43r8q wrote

[deleted]

10

TheValgus t1_jd4c9vc wrote

No, read the article.

Its the other workers.

6

[deleted] t1_jd4ey8y wrote

[deleted]

1

TheValgus t1_jd4j53k wrote

60k is not for 12 months of work.

School year is 180 days, 36 weeks. We work about 37 weeks a year.

1

DireBare t1_jd54zt0 wrote

Teachers and support staff deserve to be paid less because they have the "summers off"?

With that bullshit, I hope you aren't a teacher.

3

TheValgus t1_jd55sxb wrote

We do have summer off.

My contract literally ends a day after finals and I don’t have to do anything till next school year.

If I teach over the summer it is for extra pay.

Idk how support staff is paid but my pay and work are not for a full year.

−2

DireBare t1_jd57c6m wrote

You have summers unemployed.

And those 2 to 2.5 months are spent by most of us taking coursework, working off-contract to prepare for the school year, and working part-time, seasonal jobs because our regular salary is shit.

If you are lucky enough that your regular salary allows you to truly "take the summer off" . . . you do not represent most teachers, or definitely support staff.

3

TheValgus t1_jd5nznl wrote

I teach over the summer.

0

DireBare t1_jd5rb7a wrote

Awesome.

If that is a part of your regular contract, then you are a full-year teacher and don't get what most of us deal with.

If your summer teaching is a separate contract, then like I said, some of us work seasonally over the summers because our regular salaries suck.

Of course, that summer job can be awesome and rewarding beyond the pay, and some folks who don't really need the pay boost will work anyway . . . but again, that doesn't represent most teachers.

3

TheValgus t1_jd67yvd wrote

No.

My contract ends at summer.

Some years I choose to sign a contract and make some extra money over summer.

It’s my choice.

The point is the pay I receive for my salary does not reflect a full year of work.

1

Darth_Meowth t1_jd5096t wrote

No one reads the articles. I bet 4/5 people think this is teachers pay.

−3

Jerrymoviefan3 t1_jd5ly9k wrote

This isn’t a teachers strike. This is a strike by the very poorly paid support staff.

3