Submitted by RestSnorlax t3_10xwe1c in nottheonion
derycksan71 t1_j7vjx07 wrote
Reply to comment by SmokinJunipers in Killer whale moms are still supporting their adult sons — and it's costing them by RestSnorlax
You mean the dams built by the US Army Corps of Engineers? Or the ones run by BC Hydro. I know it's cool to bash capitalism here but ffs, these hydro electric dams that block salmon spawning from CA to Alaska are primarily built and owned by the state, not "capitalism"
HelenAngel t1_j7vlywn wrote
I personally am a fan of the salmon cannons here in the PNW that allow for both hydro power & keep salmon healthy. Apparently the salmon enjoy it as well.
LePouletMignon t1_j7vw20t wrote
>these hydro electric dams that block salmon spawning from CA to Alaska are primarily built and owned by the state, not "capitalism"
Yes, and? Nation states are some of the most hardcore capitalists lol.
yukon-flower t1_j7wgatb wrote
And a shitty dam is still a shitty dam!
Great_Hamster t1_j7x7klo wrote
That is literally not capitalism.
madhatmatt2 t1_j8067vh wrote
Yes,and? A socialist or communist country has the ability to dam rivers too not sure why this being blamed on capitalism and not lack of environmental education and disregard for the long term effects of not giving a shit about the consequences of our actions.
derycksan71 t1_j7w5hnd wrote
So public ownership of the resources and production of services...is capitalism? These are blended markets, some aspects such as publicly owned utilities, are implementation of socialism. It's not a negative.
LePouletMignon t1_j7ww3fj wrote
>So public ownership of the resources and production of services...is capitalism?
Just because something is owned by the state does not mean it isn't a part of some capitalist scheme. The state is an actor like everyone else that is free to engage in capitalist endeavours. There are countless infrastructures that don't benefit the public in any way even though, on paper, the public "owns" these structures.
The state is often a key perpetrator in processes involving extracting capital and resources while providing nothing in return for the local communities. This is called extractivism and is as far away from socialism as you can get.
derycksan71 t1_j7x3aiv wrote
Scheme....ok. capitalism bad I get it.
jspangles313 t1_j7wvo6m wrote
Yeah but something something Europe comrade Bernie Sanders both sides bad.
[deleted] t1_j7wamsx wrote
The guy you're responding to is the type to go burn down a small business and then claim they "stuck it to the man" without realizing they just ruined another middle class person's life.
Ritz527 t1_j7wuf4j wrote
Kind of tired of this braindead "everything bad is capitalism" circlejerk Reddit has. As if public services don't regularly fuck shit up lol.
littlebirdori t1_j7yj39h wrote
Why do they fuck things up though? I'd wager the answer is usually to reduce expenses and generate more revenue, both of which are aims of capitalism.
Hospitals and utility companies are supposed to be "public goods." As it turns out, market pressures incentivizing these entities to profit unconditionally from a populace utterly dependent on their services isn't very good for the public.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments