Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

probablybill t1_j9v7z4n wrote

AWD is unneeded. Good tires (even all season) will work perfectly well.

14

Aggravating_Foot_528 t1_j9w4rwt wrote

AWD helps you start. Good tires help you stop. When it's icy an snowy stopping is much more important than starting.

1

WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_j9v8u7v wrote

FYI, you can also post in r/Pennsylvania to get a better scope of answers, because Pittsburgh is in a very different climate than Tyrone.

I can say this having grown up in the Altoona area (which is down the road from Tyrone).

However, a competent driver with good winter tires will be just as functional with a FWD vehicle as AWD.

Note I said "competent driver." I rolled FWD most of my life, but as I said above, I learned how to drive in superior shitty conditions. For newcomers from the south, the two best things are AWD and staying the fuck off of the road when the ice starts to fly.

We train to drive greater distances in shittier weather on far worse roads than most of the country. Assuming everyone has that level of comfort and experience is why we're still on the roads while overconfident rookies are in the ditch.

11

ballsonthewall t1_j9v7gd2 wrote

In Pittsburgh proper? ehhh, decent tires and FWD will do you 99% of the time. In Tyrone? Little snowier and colder and more back roads that might not be maintained. Definitely a smart move, but tires do make a bigger impact that AWD in most regular driving cases.

4

VietBongArmy t1_j9v8dgt wrote

I'm on my 2nd AWD vehicle. Mine only engages when the car senses it needs to. It's far from a requirement here, you'll get around fine in winter if the tires have enough tread, I don't have snow tires. What people rarely mention in this sub about AWD, is that they handle a lot better in the rain with the water on the road.

3

DrB_477 t1_j9vbc4h wrote

Having lived here with both, if you have need to go out in bad weather and can't stay home until the roads are well cleared, AWD is nice to have. You don't really need it very much, but those few days a year that you do its worth having. It's not critically necessary, but given the choice between AWD and 2WD I wouldn't opt for the 2WD version.

Keeping your tires in good condition is the most important thing though. AWD doesn't overcome bald tires.

3

CARLEtheCamry t1_j9vlil1 wrote

> if you have need to go out in bad weather and can't stay home until the roads are well cleared, AWD is nice to have.

That's the only reason I just bought AWD, because my wife is a dog sitter and if she can't get to someone's house, that means animals are going hungry/messing the floor.

Me personally, working a 9-5 in the Airport area, never had a need. If it truly is catastrophically bad out, I just stay home.

One of the things people don't consider with AWD is the need to rotate your tires because usually they need replaced all at once. One flat, that's 4 tires. Another added expense that makes it more a luxury feature IMO.

2

HomicidalHushPuppy t1_j9v8dd4 wrote

I've driven front-drive cars with all-season tires for 16 years. I've never had an issue aside from 2 times I got stuck on un-plowed hills that I knew darn well I should'nt have driven on and decided to try anyway.

AWD definitely isn't necessary. The thing people forget about AWD too is that it's not all-wheel-stop - people think they're driving a small tank that'll do whatever they want and then end up in more trouble because they overestimated what AWD can do for you.

The biggest thing is just use common sense. If it's so bad that FWD can't make it, chances are AWD won't do much better.

2

Floopydoodler t1_j9vh8ot wrote

Tyrone is way out there and kind of sits in a weird place between mountains and cross winds can certainly change the road conditions quickly. If they have any intention of driving in the direction of Ebensburg, AWD would be most beneficial. If they are staying around Altoona, shouldn't matter.

2

rarrkshaa t1_j9v76l1 wrote

Main reason I'm carless is because when I moved here last year the new and used market were still insanely overpriced due to the pandemic wrecking the supply chain.

How is it these days? Did it get way better than it was July 2022? Or is it still pretty bad?

1

Roya1Je11y t1_j9vaply wrote

I just bought a car, the sticker prices are still a little over blue book (used cars) but the place I went was willing to work on the price. The interest rates will make you choke though

1

CARLEtheCamry t1_j9vqbb5 wrote

I just bought a new car last week.

3 year old used models were going for what new ones were, so there was no point other than availability. Older than that, prices are stupid. As you can maybe tell by my username, I'm a Toyota fanboy - usually try to find something about 5 years old used. Those type of cars are still stupid inflated. Case in point : my wife's 2010 Camry got totaled, Blue Book Value had it worth 3500-6500, and insurance paid out nearly $9k (other person's insurance who was at fault). I paid $10k for it 7 years ago. Insane. And I don't trust Blue Book anymore.

Also Hybrids/electrics basically can't be gotten (at least from Toyota). Tried multiple dealerships. They're still dealing with supply issues. We put down a deposit on a non-hybrid model a week before it was built, still took 3 weeks for us to drive it off the lot.

1

WhenRobLoweRobsLowes t1_j9v8x4p wrote

The car market hasn't improved, but it has leveled out.

0

[deleted] OP t1_j9v9vre wrote

[deleted]

0

[deleted] OP t1_j9va73g wrote

[deleted]

0

Urbanspy87 t1_j9vifsy wrote

I haven't been car shopping but someone just posted a 10+ year old car on my local neighborhood group recently for more than blue book. They admitted it in the ad too, and tried to explain why they were justified. No, just no.

1

Just_Learned_This t1_j9vrdkb wrote

It'll sell. Depends on the car but someone will take it.

The days of $2k beaters that last a year or two are gone.

2

Just_Learned_This t1_j9vr4aj wrote

You're not gonna get below MSRP on anything better than a Mitsubishi Mirage. Prices have peaked but interest rates have been on their way up and will continue to rise.

Find something you like and shop around to see who will give you closest to msrp. Don't wait or you're just gonna be stuck with a higher rate come fall.

1

moonwish22 t1_j9v8rjg wrote

If it’s in the outskirts of Tyrone in the mountains, then yes, they needed AWD. If it’s in the outskirts the other directions where you’ll be lucky to see a plow once 24 hours after the storm comes, then AWD is needed unless you want to be stuck in your lane. If they live closer toward Altoona, then you can get away without having AWD.

Short answer: it depends.

1

skfoto t1_j9v8x5x wrote

AWD is not necessary. I run snow tires on my FWD car and it’s easily tackled everything I’ve tried driving through. Though if we keep having winters like this one snow tires aren’t even necessary. Damn near could get by on racing tires in this weather.

1

More-Adhesiveness-54 t1_j9v9zgp wrote

Re: your Chicago comparison, the terrain makes a difference imo.

I lived in Michigan for a few years and have driven around a lot in central Illinois, both of which I assume has a similar terrain as Chicago. Given a fixed amount of snow, I'm way more comfortable driving in Michigan or central Illinois than PA. Worse came to worse and I were to slide off a road, I'd likely just go into a field at a similar elevation as the road. If you slide off a road in PA, there's a chance you're dropping off of and into something. The hills themselves also make a difference in terms of impact on navigability. My SO who is from central Illinois is mildly terrified of driving around Pittsburgh in snow, so your friend isn't unique (not that it's entirely rational or justified).

1

LoneStar1127 t1_j9ve2zw wrote

I also drive a ford focus. I haven’t had any issues with driving around in it. Just have good tires and go slow.

1

W3RLEGION t1_j9vg2vz wrote

Snow tires make more difference than awd. I had a second set of wheels with snow tires for the winter and never got stuck in a fwd 6 speed.

1

[deleted] OP t1_j9viwlr wrote

I grew up near Tyrone. You can get by with front wheel drive for sure. If you have a choice though, the AWD would be so nice. They’ll be doing lots of back road and high elevation interstate driving. Driving home on Xmas day this past year from Pittsburgh was pretty scary in my little front wheel drive coup. The Appalachian mountains were icy. But I made it 🤷‍♂️

1

ktxhopem3276 t1_j9vkhzj wrote

Sounds like they just wanted an excuse for a new car

1

Tako-Jerome t1_j9vmte8 wrote

my parents live in the country, having four-wheel-drive gives me a lot of mental peace when I make that drive.

1

leadfoot9 t1_j9voad9 wrote

>there's no way he would ever drive here during the winter

This is the appropriate response. No matter how good you, your tires, or your transmission are, all it takes is one idiot losing control in the other lane. Just stay home on Darwin Awards night.

But, if you must go out, you don't need AWD unless you live on a hill that never gets plowed.

1

youtriedincomicsans t1_j9vq4dr wrote

It very much depends on your loved ones' needs to drive in all conditions at all hours.

Do they work in health care, emergency services, critical infrastructure, etc. and need to be at work any day, any time of day? Get AWD. City plowing especially can be spotty.

Are they retired and/or do they have jobs where they can work from home or take off during severe storms? Don't bother. It's been about five years since the freezing rain/snow/lack of plowing combination was so bad that people were trapped for an entire weekend.

Until recently, I had a FWD Ford Focus and had trouble on all seasons in winter, but getting winter tires fixed the problems I had with going uphill in the snow. I have the option of staying home in severe weather and I use that option to make room on the road for people who work in critical sectors.

1

sonofcrack t1_j9w2yok wrote

Honestly depends on the borough. I’ve dailyed a RWD sportscar in the South Hills for the past 2 years without much issue. Definitely a little sliding but nothing I couldn’t handle. I’ve personally never heard of Tyrone and looking it up it seems to be out in the middle of PA. You may get some more untreated roads out there and the AWD may come in handy

1

billfriedman9987 t1_j9w66bg wrote

Normally, very important.. this year outside of the ice storm, not so much.. and awd isn’t helping in that stuff

1

hypotenoos t1_j9vajdv wrote

It can get pretty nasty in Tyrone and it gets rural around there real fast with much bigger mountains.

0

Wide-Concert-7820 t1_j9vdph6 wrote

Tyrone gets more snow and has less resources. The winter forecast changes about 45 minutes east of Pittsburgh. You might want to concentrate on responses from that area. The areas around it, Johnstown and Altoona have seen half or more of their population leave, yet have the same amount of roads.....other than that, FWD with good tires is almost always sufficient.

0

[deleted] OP t1_j9vljuv wrote

[deleted]

0

[deleted] OP t1_j9vnke1 wrote

[deleted]

2

Jmyles23 t1_j9vveqj wrote

Any of them. Whichever you can afford and fits your needs. And used ones are generally decent.

1

mmphoto412 t1_j9vm46o wrote

It’s not necessary, certainly nice to have, but not a requirement. Don’t forget not too long ago awd cars were pretty rare with the exception of two brands

0

newtypezaku t1_j9v7e9t wrote

No, people just generally suck at driving in poor weather.

I've never owned an AWD and it's never mattered, because unless you live on a nasty hill, there are generally ways to avoid nasty hills.

−1