Comments
CheckOutDisMuthaFuka t1_iu2rask wrote
Are lambskin condoms even still a thing? I remember hearing they were terrible when I was a kid..... Many, many, many years ago
Edit: many
JimProphet t1_iu2rf63 wrote
This is why sheep are always spreading STDs.
bigbbypddingsnatchr OP t1_iu2rkhz wrote
Terrible? No. Except they don't protect against STDs. Lol.
bigbbypddingsnatchr OP t1_iu2rl8m wrote
Actual_Dinner_5977 t1_iu2rnie wrote
I'd like to apologize to all the lambs out there...
HappySkullsplitter t1_iu2rwd8 wrote
No wonder the drug store clerk looked at me so strangely when I said that I couldn't find the lambskin condoms
CheckOutDisMuthaFuka t1_iu2sfuo wrote
That's.... Pretty terrible if you ask me.
But I do also recall hearing that they were subpar as birth control as well. But that's 100% anecdotal.
My point being why would people bother buying them when there are superior and easy to get latex condoms? Is there some other benefit that I'm not aware of?
discowithmyself t1_iu2sl9u wrote
Some people have a latex allergy but that’s the only reason I can think of
Lingua_Blanca t1_iu2sm7h wrote
I am skeptical that anyone old enough to remember lambskin condoms, would not know this. That's right, I am suggesting that you did NOT actually learn this today!
bigbbypddingsnatchr OP t1_iu2su5n wrote
Bc many people are allergic to latex ....
And lambskin condoms are thinner and transmit heat better.
bigbbypddingsnatchr OP t1_iu2t0mj wrote
Lol. Correct.
mydogsarebrown t1_iu2tlf4 wrote
Thats why in New Zealand they sell sheep with warning labels now.
respectfulpanda t1_iu2u3rg wrote
Not only do you sleep with that lamb, but all the lambs they slept with.
CheckOutDisMuthaFuka t1_iu2u3yr wrote
True... Didn't think of that.
CheckOutDisMuthaFuka t1_iu2u7we wrote
Didn't think of the allergy.
ZoneBreaker97 t1_iu2ua58 wrote
TIL that there is such a thing as lambskin condoms...
bigbbypddingsnatchr OP t1_iu2ua87 wrote
Lolololololol
MyWifeDontKnowItsMe t1_iu2w1lo wrote
That's why you gotta use the whole sheep.
MyCatThinksImNeat t1_iu2wv5g wrote
Us Scots were ahead of our time.
Malignantrumor99 t1_iu2yiok wrote
And so if you use them you should be aware.
StoryAndAHalf t1_iu305or wrote
I heard of them before, and I always assumed they were used by people allergic to latex.
plebotamus t1_iu32a1w wrote
Well now I feel sheepish.
notaverypinkpig t1_iu34dhu wrote
Sheepishly transmitted disease.
At least they’re sheepish about it.
Dotto_9999 t1_iu34fi7 wrote
Tbh there weren't that many STDs floating around in the caveman ages.
SARS2KilledEpstein t1_iu34ipp wrote
Found the Welsh redditor.
kingofblazingfire t1_iu3767q wrote
Good. To. Know. Now how do I make a doctors appointment?
lizardtufts t1_iu38x0m wrote
Lifestyles brand are polypropylene, I believe. Also non-latex, but protects from STDs
[deleted] t1_iu39eo5 wrote
[deleted] t1_iu39hkc wrote
[deleted]
The_Mad_March_Hare t1_iu3al8b wrote
Charlie Sheen has entered the chat
Brock_Way t1_iu3c2p6 wrote
This is one of the many things I said 20 years ago about HIV in particular and got hounded into oblivion by the nutters talking about "you're going to get people killed; if you knew anything about science... "
Meanwhile I was QUOTING the science. All these variables were published in the sero-discordant couples articles. They even published the statistics related to seroconversion after single instance of vaginal sex. People thought wearing a condom reduced your chance of seroconversion from near certain to one in a million or some shit.
The truth turned out to be that wearing a condom changed your odds from about 1:1,000 to about 1:5,000.
If that is going to change your behavior fundamentally, okay....
Aceof_Knaves t1_iu3cru0 wrote
jimmyxs t1_iu3dlyk wrote
Nah. We beat you to it. Regards, Kiwis
Do-ya-like-Baileys t1_iu3dvof wrote
They feel way better than regular condoms. They feel like almost nothing. They’re good for monogamous couples who are only concerned with pregnancy, not STDs. They’re super expensive though.
Specialist_Peach4294 t1_iu3e3dv wrote
Charlie 'Tiger Blood' Sheen.
On hookers, "You don't pay them for sex, you pay them to leave"
bigbbypddingsnatchr OP t1_iu3f19u wrote
Are you talking specifically about lambskin condoms?
Hello-There-GKenobi t1_iu3hm7o wrote
Thought it was the Irish?
unknownentity1782 t1_iu3hrh6 wrote
Those condoms are absolutely terrible.
triveee t1_iu3i46m wrote
Uhhh, no I'm pretty sure you didn't.
Sunnygurrl t1_iu3j8v1 wrote
And this kiddies, is why Sex Ed should be taught in schools again.
unknownentity1782 t1_iu3k9am wrote
> Is there some other benefit that I'm not aware of?
They feel better.
My wife doesn't do well with any female contraceptives, and so instead of making her suffer, I wear condoms. I have no fear of STI's, so that detractor is out. If both stop pregnancy, I'm going to go with the one that feels better.
Or in my case, the one I can afford, so I still use latex. But, if I could afford it, I'd switch.
lord_drutt t1_iu3klou wrote
Without context, this does beg the question of "how" you learned this.
Words_Are_Hrad t1_iu3sz56 wrote
Not so strange humans learned to wrap that willy before they learned how to make latex.
JadedSociopath t1_iu3wa6v wrote
What? You can actually buy them? In 2022?
Moosetappropriate t1_iu3z5cf wrote
They should know that wool hangs on to everything. And is a bitch to sanitize.
CleBees t1_iu3zwsf wrote
Ok I am from the US but...am I detecting 'sheep shag' humor of the UK?
bmeupsctty t1_iu4aawp wrote
Latex allergies my dude
DesertSweat t1_iu4cd14 wrote
Can confirm. Too small. Can’t feel anything.
Woolliza t1_iu4ce9s wrote
Latex allergies are common.
DesertSweat t1_iu4coup wrote
Um…..yes there were. Most of the ones you know today existed back then. HIV didn’t but pretty much everything else existed.
ZoneBreaker97 t1_iu4ed28 wrote
Polyurethane and polyisoprene condoms are also common
CoolHandRK1 t1_iu4eem9 wrote
My wife is allergic to latex. Back when we were dating I used Polyurethane condoms instead.
jaimechandra t1_iu4i90y wrote
Yup, sure can buy them in many places They’re great!
jaimechandra t1_iu4ify4 wrote
Latex allergy. Wanting to actually feel sex. Those who don’t want kids right now who are in fluid bonded relationships.
jaimechandra t1_iu4im64 wrote
Pregnancy is life altering and a potential death sentence, much worse than an STI
JadedSociopath t1_iu4jg08 wrote
Is this just a USA thing? I’ve never heard of this before.
sauerbraten67 t1_iu4li5e wrote
I hope you didn't learn the hard way.
MyCatThinksImNeat t1_iu4tjbs wrote
Ewe sure do
Brock_Way t1_iu55dvs wrote
Condoms in general. For example:
HIV sexual transmission risk among serodiscordant couples: assessing the effects of combining prevention strategies [AIDS. 2014 Jun 19; 28(10): 1521–1529]
Pay attention to the author list, because there is probably going to be quiz later on at some point.
EDIT: Condom and Nonoxynol-9 use and the incidence of HIV infection in serodiscordant couples in Zambia [25+ years ago now]
FeeValuable22 t1_iu5b1vw wrote
That's really about the only thing I learned in the army. Luckily not the hard way.
QuartzSheep17 t1_iu5k8bz wrote
Ah... the Welsh method. Very efficient.
darceysfakelips t1_iu5l1d5 wrote
So, what disease did you catch?
bigbbypddingsnatchr OP t1_iu5ohxi wrote
Lol
I am a disease.
[deleted] t1_iu5ole2 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_iu5pkcs wrote
[deleted]
NearPeerAdversary t1_iu5wazu wrote
I'm a meat eater and have no problem with using animal products, but for some reason, the idea of covering my dick with the intestines of a dead animal and fucking my SO with it, is kind of off putting. Logically it shouldn't, but for some reason it just hits differently than using them for other things like leather clothing, sausage casings, etc.
Iz-kan-reddit t1_iu64dha wrote
>I am skeptical that anyone old enough to remember lambskin condoms
They're available at your local drugstore today.
Iz-kan-reddit t1_iu64f56 wrote
They also suck in comparison.
_WitchoftheWaste t1_iu6512o wrote
Imagine being slaughtered so someone can use your skin to fuck. Anyway thanks for the info OP I had no idea.
bigbbypddingsnatchr OP t1_iu65rzy wrote
Lambskin condoms aren't actually made of lambskin.
I also don't think the animals are killed purely for this purpose.
Not saying that it's right.
_WitchoftheWaste t1_iu65zq6 wrote
It was just a fleeting thought dont worry I wasnt making any sort of moral statement. However i didnt know they werent actually lambskin. Learning all about these things today.
bigbbypddingsnatchr OP t1_iu683bk wrote
Made of the lamb's large intensional pouch.
mLOVEaMIDNIGHTitdotc t1_iu6gt5x wrote
They also feel and smell gross. 0/10 do not recommend unless they’re your only option (latex allergy)
mLOVEaMIDNIGHTitdotc t1_iu6gx0f wrote
I’d argue they felt disgusting and smelled horrible - maybe I had a bad brand! Lol
Electronic_Dog3847 t1_iu77n1z wrote
What!
Do-ya-like-Baileys t1_iu79etv wrote
They definitely have a smell, I don’t think it’s bad though, just weird. I would assume they could smell bad if they were stored improperly or old. I think they feel better probably because they transfer heat better and they feel more natural because they are made out of actual organic material.
dynodick t1_iubdro0 wrote
They make much more common and popular non-latex alternatives
[deleted] t1_iubqa0p wrote
[deleted]
LobbydaLobster t1_iuh8872 wrote
"To begin, they aren’t made of a lamb’s skin but rather from the lamb’s cecum, a large intestinal pouch."
Seriously? Sheep intestines!
I thought lambskin was just a nickname all this time.
[deleted] t1_iu2r8k6 wrote
And?