Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Flares117 OP t1_j28hcmg wrote

He was regarded as one of the greatest emperors working hand and hand with officials. It was noted that there was almost no palace intrigue by the eunuchs or power struggles.

His son was given the best education and teaching on how to follow in his father's footsteps, but he loved brothels and hated his wife https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hongzhi_Emperor

He was a party boy with "The Zhengde Emperor took up a luxurious and prodigal lifestyle and indulged himself in women. It was said that he liked to frequent brothels and even created palaces called "Bao Fang" (豹房; literally "The Leopards' Chamber") outside the Forbidden City in Beijing initially to house exotic animals such as tigers and leopards for his amusement and then later used to house beautiful women for his personal enjoyment.[3] He also met Wang Mantang, one of his favorite consorts at a Bao Fang. On one occasion he was badly mauled while hunting tigers, and could not appear in court audiences for a month.[2] On another occasion he burned down his palace by storing gunpowder in the courtyards during the lantern festival.[2] His harem was so overfilled that many women starved to death due to lack of supplies.[4]"

Imagine having a haram so large, you dont have enough food for all your waifus

270

crixx93 t1_j297e7l wrote

Was he gay though?

−39

bikkhu42 t1_j29ee56 wrote

Father: >tolerant towards Muslims

Son: “imma haram”

339

zucksucksmyberg t1_j29locl wrote

There was a quote, I can't remember where I read it and paraphrasing it "Will Alexander still be considered "Great" if his empire fragmented before he died?"

Sure Alexander was an able conqueror but administering an empire as large as he carved is another matter. It literally fragmented at his death bed.

Also begs the idea if Heraclius is gonna be considered one of the "Greatest" Roman Emperors if he died a year or two before the Rashidun Caliphate undid his victories.

54

TheNightIsLost t1_j29mkp9 wrote

Alexander was the greatest conqueror in history, but he was not really a great king. He was basically his mom's puppet in Macedon and had to try to conquer new lands before he could consider himself sovereign....and then he screwed things up due to his Persophilia and so his generals took over after he died.

In fact, they may well have helped him along by poisoning him, but that's not confirmed.

24

radio_allah t1_j29myua wrote

> He was regarded as one of the greatest Emperors

Interestingly, he wasn't. And not because he's not benevolent enough, but that he's not expansionist or 'glorious' enough. Most modern Chinese folks wouldn't know who he was, and if you ask about greatest emperors, would give you Emperor Wu of Han, Taizong of Tang, Kangxi, or the First Emperor, and even if you ask specifically about the Ming dynasty, would likely give you Emperor Yongle. All those were better conquerors.

It's actually a shame how most competent but peaceful emperors are little known, and do not make it to 'greatest' lists.

44

zucksucksmyberg t1_j29nbza wrote

Highly likely one of his Companion Generals poisoned him. His father was assasinated too after all.

With regards to being the "Greatest" Conqueror, I rate Genghis a little bit higher than Alexander, who also happened to be a great administrator.

23

web_explorer t1_j29q5fs wrote

Our current Emperor Xi could learn a thing or two from him

5

RealMENwearPINK10 t1_j29qfb9 wrote

The Chinese nowadays, unconfirmed: "We were this close to greatness!"

−19

ihahtcuwauil t1_j29qxol wrote

it's rare to find a historical character that isn't a monster

36

TheNightIsLost t1_j29rjlf wrote

The Mongols had a LOT of conquerors though. There was only one Alexander, but there were dozens of great Mongol generals.

And to make things better, the Mongol Empire coalesced at precisely the time when the Number 1 breaker of steppe empires, China, was in no position to fight them thanks to a horrible civil war and the dumbest goddamned Dynasty to ever rule the country.

It also helped that the other great horse riding empire, the Muslims, were basically in pieces at the time. So the Mongols could easily defeat them one at a time.

They weren't quite as lucky when fighting empires that were perfectly fine tho. The Indians beat them so easily that they barely even remember fighting them at all. The Vietnamese utterly humiliated them, hilariously so.

18

TheNightIsLost t1_j2a7dow wrote

Song Dynasty. Idiots literally funded the Mongols after Genghis Khan died, which should have led to the empire collapsing, and then got attacked once the Jin had been destroyed by the Mongols.

Their own military also sucked, because the entire court was basically working for the enemies, and the generals constantly had to relay each battle's strategy to the court even when the battles were days away, which mean they almost always lacked any initiative.

If it had been literally ANY other dynasty, they could have finished the Mongols off. It's not like Genghis Khan was the first steppe conqueror China had faced. But the Song constantly kept snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, and ensured all of China got conquered by foreigners for the first time in history.

15

Mesiya90 t1_j2aa5t7 wrote

When you are faced with a statistical outlier of 1, it is worth looking for explanations.

It was the express duty of Chinese emperors to have many many sons with their concubines to ensure lineage.

You may not know this, but chinese emperors could choose any of their illegitimate sons to rule after them - they typically did this to stop unsuitable heirs.

This guy not doing so raises an eyebrow.

−21

jointheredditarmy t1_j2amo8z wrote

This is why hereditary rule is so terrible. The Japanese have figured it out to some extent. It’s not unheard of for families without children or with incompetent children to “adopt” adults into the family to carry on the family business. Even that’s only slightly better though, meritocracy bc of capitalism and the nuclear family has probably done more to progress society than most people realize. Yes it’s not perfect, there’s nepotism, there’s greed, but we as humans haven’t figured out an alternative that’s been proven at scale yet.

30

CrestedBonedog t1_j2anljx wrote

He sounds a lot like the Roman emperor Antoninus Pius, similarly not well-remembered despite being a very competent, good ruler who presided over one of the longest stretches of peace in Roman history.

27

ArmedBull t1_j2au350 wrote

As much as I love Phillip II, Frederick William I of Prussia and Frederick the Great nailed the "kingdom building father" and "empire conquering son" combo so much better. Not as flashy, but a little longer lasting.

10

ArmedBull t1_j2aur2e wrote

So, it's less fun, but from what little I understand of Mandarin(?) pronunciation all of the A's in that name would be pronounced something like "ahh"; closer to "Wong Mon Tong".

3

mekdot83 t1_j2az9gl wrote

Not a great way to measure the size of a harem. I mean, that could be one woman he forgot to feed.

8

Hydra57 t1_j2boa23 wrote

Well tbf he inherited his father’s army (with all of its crack discipline and veterancy), his father’s plans, and a fortuitous group loyal advisors and friends. Some speculate that Alexander was actually rather dangerously reckless, all things considered. His greatness can be attributed to the successes of his father and an extraordinary amount of luck.

4

TheNightIsLost t1_j2c8hrj wrote

Frederick was a warmongering lunatic though, and only survived because of sheer luck.

Prussia then proceeded to follow his example of having basically no strategy asides from "ATTACK!!!", and ignoring anything beyond tactics.

3

provocative_bear t1_j2c8y8r wrote

You have to be more specific. The basic story of China is about 6000 years of a cycle of a competent emperor coming to power, each successive emperor in the dynasty is worse than the last, it gets to a point where the emperor is a legendary assclown, horrible things happen to the Chinese people, and then a rebellion/coup happens and there’s a new emperor.

4

TheNightIsLost t1_j2ceuis wrote

Those were not his accomplishments, those were just some of the tools he used to set up his accomplishments.

I can't argue that if not for daddy dearest, Alex wouldn't have been able to start to become a great conqueror until he was in his 40s.

3

TallGuyPA t1_j2cn773 wrote

So the Marcus Aurelius and Commodus of Chinese history?

4

Newmanuel t1_j2crq4n wrote

Killing hundreds of thousands of people and conquering lands doesn't make you a good ruler, especially if you can't keep the empire together afterwards.

He's great the way genghis khan is great. A world historic militarty leader. but a great emperor he was not

2

ArgonXgaming t1_j2d5x6t wrote

Depends on what you see as a gigachad. Fuckboy type? Then he isn't. The type as in "an exemplary male figure", then yeah, seems so.

The first one was the OG usage, and second one evolved over time from memes. To sum up that version: the really cool and respectable type of guy (chad) is actually the one who respects his women, supports his fellow guy friends, does something amazing, and generally is a good influence rather than a toxic one

3

Bartholomew- t1_j2d902y wrote

Japanese women beauty standards have been ridiculous throughout it's history. Men where obsessed with thin women. Most women of that day would have been considered anorexic today.

1

gregmck t1_j2dfmit wrote

You can see why monogamy was so rare— it effectively ended his line of succession.

“Unlike almost all of his predecessors and successors who took up many concubines who bore many children to the emperor, the Hongzhi Emperor had only one Empress during his lifetime. Coupled with the fact that Empress Zhang had only two sons (one of whom died in infancy), the Hongzhi Emperor was left with only one nominee to succeed him. After the emperor died in 1505, he was succeeded by his son, the Zhengde Emperor. The Zhengde Emperor died childless in 1521 and the throne had to be passed to a cousin from Hubei named Zhu Houcong, effectively ending the Hongzhi Emperor's own line of succession.”— wikipedia

1