Chariots487

Chariots487 t1_j7stezh wrote

He's the only financial youtuber who doesn't start every video by droning "not financial advice, not a financial adviser"(arya realty, arya serious) and then proceeding to tell you how you should invest your money. The most he's ever done is show you what you shouldn't invest in, by way of demonstrating that it's a scam.

7

Chariots487 t1_j6widb8 wrote

Yes, this time the internet's really going away forever. It didn't happen with Y2K, and it didn't happen with net neutrality, but this time the evil forces/poorly-programmed technology will surely destroy all we love and cherish! Side note, anyone who cares that much about this site should be legally prohibited from operating heavy machinery.

−1

Chariots487 t1_j4upkv1 wrote

Remember: there were no terrorists, criminals, or state-sponsored disinformation bots/agents on Twitter before October 27th. This is an entirely new phenomenon and was definitely not a known problem.

0

Chariots487 t1_j44ku2s wrote

On the planet where "this other guy did something bad too!" doesn't automatically excuse another person's actions. If you can only talk about this by constantly repeating "but Trump is worse!" your priority isn't "hey a bad thing happened" it's "hey I need to make sure the President doesn't look bad because of this bad thing that happened."

−1

Chariots487 t1_j43gnld wrote

Oh, but don't you know? You have the emotional stability of a small child, and you just can't handle words that could literally at all be tied to anything bad that ever happened to people who looked like you hundreds of years ago. This is why white people need to start moral crusades to get people to not say "Pokemon master" because it'll offend you!(yes, that's a real thing I saw once)

7

Chariots487 t1_j43g46j wrote

>He's an idiot for making the same mistake as Trump and should face similar consequences

The problem is that most of your side strongly disagrees with this. We're already seeing waves of loyal accounts start saying why he didn't mean to so it isn't a problem, that he should be held to lower standards than, say, someone in the military who did this exact same thing(they'd get everything short of an on-the-spot discharge), that those documents might not have needed to be classified anyway because "everyone knows" America overclassifies things so it isn't a problem. They're not willing to let the truth of the matter that you've laid out speak for itself.

−2