GhostOfRobertTreat

GhostOfRobertTreat t1_jebx4mz wrote

So that is a good point that I hadn’t considered. Apologies. Obviously I did not mean that blind people are idiots.

What is the general practice in that case for when it’s not considered a good idea to remove a lane of traffic to accommodate? In some places you narrow a lane but this would be taking a two lane thoroughfare down to one and probably cause other issues.

8

GhostOfRobertTreat t1_jebsub3 wrote

There are certainly things to point to that the city can do better but this is just a temporary condition for construction. I wouldn’t count this along with the lack of bike lanes, bump outs, etc. when done, the pedestrian access will be restored. It’s not a permanent issue.

4

GhostOfRobertTreat t1_jdtepel wrote

Reply to comment by sutisuc in Leasing Sign up at Shaq II by recnilcram

Downtown Newark needs more wealthy people to help spur local businesses. The city has a lot of affordable and middle-income housing (though not enough of that is new) but it doesn’t have much in the way of actual luxury buildings.

2

GhostOfRobertTreat t1_jcwi43g wrote

Come over to /r/Newark if you’re interested in a development discussion. There’s a lot more current under construction and a ton more planned.

Newark is large. When we say “Newark’s comeback,” we should be clear what we’re talking about. Which is generally a Downtown that’s competitive with Hoboken and JC in terms of nightlife and residential options.

There are areas of the city that still struggle with crime and poverty but even those areas are much safer and better off than say 20 - 30 years ago. On the other hand, a single-family home near me just sold for $1.2M.

22