GreenAnder

GreenAnder t1_jcyg951 wrote

Not sure about totally safe. It’s safer sure, it’s also in district 1 which was never that residential.

Rutgers also has partnerships in the city and does a better job being a good neighbor than temple does. Philly is also very different then Camden, but there are still things temple could do much better.

−1

GreenAnder t1_j6xurft wrote

I'm an avid cyclist but I don't really see the City getting better for non-drivers until there are more non-drivers. People are obsessed with cars because our transit is such a damn mess, they need to extend the subway ASAP. It's criminal that it hasn't happened already.

6

GreenAnder t1_j5ysoos wrote

Unfortunately this is a common administrative compromise. You can have slightly more lax administration, in which case you spend less on admin costs and can be sure people who need it got it. You can also have more strict administration, which costs more and will almost certainly create a barrier to people who actually need the money.

At the end of the day you need to ask yourself if it's more important that everyone who needs it gets it or that no one abuses the system.

2