Infernalism

Infernalism t1_jdt6sav wrote

Wait, what?

They're paying for something...and they're going to want to hide it?

Tell you what: Send me your money and pretend like you're hiding the mark. It'll get put to better use than giving it to Musk.

2

Infernalism t1_jcyq90g wrote

>During a Budget and Appropriations Committee hearing last week, Supervisor Hillary Ronen voiced frustration that the city's police force appeared to be prioritizing retail theft over the safety of the residents in her district.

>"I've been begging this department to give the Mission what it deserves in terms of police presence, all year long. And I've been told time-and-time-and-time-and-time again there are no officers that we can send to Mission. And then I see these numbers protecting shoppers, and it hurts. It hurts. And I feel betrayed by the department, I feel betrayed by the mayor, I feel betrayed by the priorities of this city," Ronen said during the hearing. "It is not this board of supervisor's priorities -- we want our residents safe."

18

Infernalism t1_jcfmg3s wrote

Okay, so.

Take a balloon, uninflated, and take a marker and put a bunch of dots onto the outside of the balloon.

Each dot represents a galaxy. Put as many dots as you can onto the balloon.

Now, blow it up.

Notice how the dots are spreading away from each other even though they're not moving?

That's the universe. The universe itself is expanding like a balloon, and the galaxies are moving apart from each other.

The galaxies stay together as galaxies due to something to do with dark matter that we don't yet understand.

2

Infernalism t1_ja7pjcw wrote

The problem is that every single nuclear project has been plagued with these cost and time overruns. Even standard and well understood nuclear plants are seeing time overruns in the decades and cost overruns that end up doubling the price. Or more.

For standard nuclear plants. Ones we've been building for decades and decades.

Meanwhile, solar and wind and battery tech continues to improve steadily even though we're seeing regular tech improvements that should, logically, mean that it'd cost more. But, it doesn't. It lowers the price on renewables. Constantly.

Is it any surprise people are leery as fuck about investing in nuclear?

15

Infernalism t1_ja7opfb wrote

>This month, Los Alamos and other local utilities across the West were facing a weighty decision: whether to pull the plug on their nuclear dream. NuScale had informed members of the group, Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems, or UAMPS, that the estimated costs of building the six 77-MW reactors had risen by more than 50 percent to $9.3 billion. For Garcia, that translated into a jump in the cost of energy from $58 to $89 per megawatt-hour.

Gasp! A nuclear project with sudden and totally unexpected time/cost overruns?! Who could possibly have seen this coming?

Imagine how much solar/wind/battery tech could have been built and improved with all those billions and the last 6 years.

11

Infernalism t1_j9rxlp6 wrote

You can use the old 'balloon' analogy.

Take a balloon and mark a bunch of dots on the outside of the balloon. Then blow it up.

As you blow it up, the dots expand away from each other, but they're not actually moving, are they? It's the fabric of the balloon stretching.

Likewise, the fabric of space is expanding and stretching. Dark matter is what keeps galaxies connected to each other through this expanding, but the galaxies are spreading apart from each other.

4