KumagawaUshio

KumagawaUshio t1_j6p447a wrote

Looking at who produces it which includes an Israeli company I wonder if it gets subsidies by the Israeli government for home grown production.

That may make it cheap enough to use as filler.

Because lets be honest all network shows are filler when not airing the NFL.

3

KumagawaUshio t1_j65qozv wrote

In 2022 Seinfeld had 19.3 billion viewing minutes on Netflix (https://twitter.com/TVGrimReaper/status/1618712254454837248) That's 8th place for the year of shows on Netflix and beats Wednesdays 18.6 billion minutes.

Netflix agreed to pay $100 million a year for 5 years for 176 episodes or less than $600,000 an episode per year.

I don't know Wednesday's cost but unless season 2 releases in 2023 it's not going to chart in 2023 while Seinfeld will and will continue to do so for each of its 5 years.

52

KumagawaUshio t1_j63x1cd wrote

That worked when they had huge cable TV revenue from affiliate fees and advertising.

With the decline in cable TV revenue they need a replacement that was supposed to be streaming but it takes 6 streaming customers to replace 1 cable TV customer.

The other way is to massively downsize to a third of their current size to copy Sony and just licence shows but that does have consequences like massive layoffs, reduced share price and less money to take chances on new shows and films unless they are owned by a company with diversified revenue streams.

2

KumagawaUshio t1_j5a31bw wrote

Network broadcast TV exists because of the NFL the rest is all money losing filler and has been for the last 5 odd years.

Cable TV will continue as long as people pay for the bundle even as new scripted content on cable TV disappears for cheap 'reality' TV.

If the writers go on strike its going to mainly affect streaming services that rely on constant new scripted content.

8

KumagawaUshio t1_j2firp3 wrote

It was pulling between 400 and 600 million minutes of viewing in a week across all episodes released at the time.

In comparison a CBS drama like FBI pulls in 600 million minutes of viewing or 10 million viewers with Live+3 days and is for only a single episode.

Disney+ had over 46 million US domestic subscribers during Andors run (unknown total with password sharing).

CBS is available to just over 122 million households in the US.

3

KumagawaUshio t1_j2fh3vl wrote

Build up was fine when the choice was 'do I watch the 8:00PM drama on ABC, NBC or CBS' but today you have near limitless entertainment options and you really need a hook for the first episode and then do longer character pieces later.

I watched the first two episodes of Andor was bored all the way through so went and spent my very limited free time to do something else. Maybe if I was in school/college still or unemployed I would have continued but working 5-6 12-18 hour shifts every week limits my free time and just browsing the internet like this is just more relaxing since I'm not locking myself in to any site for an hour.

0

KumagawaUshio t1_iydra49 wrote

What so the issue is they flew in English speakers for a documentary targeted to English speakers rather than use subtitles? how is that a problem.

The Bahamas is a country with a smaller population than a mid size town in some countries so considering how that even in the USA shark specialist scientists aren't that common even in a country with over 80,000 times its population.

−4

KumagawaUshio t1_iycua48 wrote

What are you talking about this isn't about Warner not making animation it's about selling it to other distribution platforms because they can't afford a money furnace like HBO Max without a rich sugar daddy like AT&T to pay for it.

It's why Sony doesn't do streaming and why Disney is also seeing its share price collapse streaming just doesn't make money.

8

KumagawaUshio t1_ixwkdk6 wrote

All the broadcast and cable channels have become crap because their owners are all focused on streaming which while it is the future is also a massive blackhole of money.

The channel owners complain about cable cutting as they themselves kill their own channels by depriving them of content.

3

KumagawaUshio t1_ixu8mwr wrote

What incredibly popular 21st Century Fox properties?

Looking at $100+ million domestic grossing 20th Century Fox films since 2008

Disney already bought Star Wars and Marvel.

Independence Day 2 crashed and burned.

The Taken, Die Hard, Alien and Predator franchises have been milked to death.

Blue Sky got shutdown.

Dreamworks animations distribution deal ended, and they got bought by Universal.

The Alvinn and the Chipmunks licence ended and is up for sale (Paramount is the expected buyer).

That leaves Avatar, Planet of the Apes and Night at the Museum.

−6

KumagawaUshio t1_ixu69l1 wrote

Which shows you don't know shit.

Theatrical marvel is good for Iger's ego but basically couch cushion change to the bottom line.

Disney makes the real money with the Theme Parks and ESPN cable affiliate fees.

Disney vastly overpaid for 21st Century Fox and has nearly 4 years later little to show for it.

It's new content that drives subscribers to streaming services not old catalogue content.

−16

KumagawaUshio t1_iu6l34q wrote

I got the first two films as a birthday present from my parents when I was 13.

They just knew it was an 18 rated anime and at the time while anime may have been violent there wasn't any porn anime released in the UK so they just thought it was another violent action one oops.

2