MarginCalled1
MarginCalled1 t1_jaqe6yb wrote
Reply to comment by Clarkeprops in Figure: One robot for every human on the planet. by GodOfThunder101
We're also discovering new processes, materials, designs, and other factors that allow us to continue on the trajectory I mentioned. I'm actively involved in some of this work.
The primary issue is battery size and capacity, otherwise we would have robots such as those from Boston Dynamics already out completing limited work for us. As I mentioned batteries have been a heavy area of investment with a lot of advancements and options coming commercially in the next 2-3 years.
The secondary limiting factor is the ability of current LLM and AI programs. Also note that most labs have departments that use AI to help design, test and measure new products and services, and in some cases is able to write code based on a prompt and therefor as AI improves so does the technology that supports further advancement.
I'd be willing to bet my aforementioned numbers are very close estimates of where we will be at that time.
MarginCalled1 t1_jaqaokw wrote
Reply to comment by Clarkeprops in Figure: One robot for every human on the planet. by GodOfThunder101
Hardware is advancing at an exponential rate. Every 2 years, according to Moore's Law (historically accurate) the number of transistors on a microchip doubles resulting in your electronics being twice as fast to process new information.
At the same time software - more specifically AI - is advancing at a similarly exponential rate, doubling in ability/speed every 6 months on average.
Both of the above items are multiplicative to each other as they progress, resulting an massive jumps in processing power, and software improvements in short periods of time.
As an example if you look at some of the first console video games released (Mario, Duck Hunt, Transylvania, Excite Bike, etc) and then go search YouTube for "GTA 5 4k Ultra Hd Graphics" then click on the top one with a bike snippet and compare the graphics and depth of each it's nothing less than absolutely incredible.
Then throw in that in the same period we went from wired phone lines to a phone that can call, text, and surf the internet, and even speak to a program, tell it to create new art, stories, and recite the worlds knowledge to you plainly in your language and it will complete the entire process in less than 5 seconds.
I would say within the next 7 years we will have fully functioning human-like robots capable of most daily human tasks. I'd also guess that by this point a large amount of the human workforce will start feeling the effects of software eroding 'white collar' work.
The exponential nature of our advancement leads me to believe this is true. I would also like to note all the progress we are seeing in battery technologies and manufacturing discoveries. All three play a role with AI being the one that will most critically define the next phase of human life, whether we are extinct, in utopia or somewhere in the middle.
MarginCalled1 t1_jae2dx9 wrote
Reply to comment by PunkRockDude in When will AI develop faster than white collar workers can reskill through education? by just-a-dreamer-
And unfortunately the Government is even slower.
MarginCalled1 t1_ja1vrii wrote
Reply to comment by AylaDoesntLikeYou in Meta unveils a new large language model that can run on a single GPU by AylaDoesntLikeYou
"Hey Windows, please fix your shit!"
"Shit fixed, is there anything else I can help you with?"
MarginCalled1 t1_ja1pce7 wrote
Reply to comment by SomeoneSomewhere1984 in How far off are we from not needing to learn languages? by AmericanMonsterCock
Microsoft is testing software within their 'Teams' program that will translate spoken language in real time between multiple parties.
I'd estimate that by 2025 ( 2 years from now ) human translators will start disappearing at a rapid pace. Call Center workers will also start seeing large layoffs due to AI at this point as well.
Source: I work in AI and have friends all over the industry.
MarginCalled1 t1_j9vjxsd wrote
Reply to comment by landlord2213 in Meet the mushroom that could one day replace plastic by landlord2213
I want to quickly point out that we already make packaging, shoes, leather and other items from mushrooms. I'm excited for it to start really taking over in the near future, but did want to clarify that we already have some of these products being made at a medium scale.
MarginCalled1 t1_j9kziha wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Microsoft is already undoing some of the limits it placed on Bing AI by YaAbsolyutnoNikto
Ninja or Nails?
MarginCalled1 t1_j9hp5hw wrote
Reply to comment by Neurogence in Two Deans suspended after using ChatGPT to write email to students by Neurogence
I use ChatGPT to write all of my emails that require more than a line or two, then I go through and make edits as necessary.
We live in strange times, this is like someone in the late 80s writing an E-MAIL to address fatalities, they couldn't even write a normal letter and send it in the mail like everyone else??!
In a couple years we'll look back and nod at how dumb this is.
MarginCalled1 t1_j87qoox wrote
Reply to comment by Semifreak in If one day humans relocate to another planet, and Earth is then colonized by aliens, will we get back to reclaim Earth? by basafish
Hell yeah brother!
MarginCalled1 t1_j6jw5db wrote
Reply to comment by tinylobsta in Nothing, Forever — AI-generated, always streaming parody of ‘90s sitcoms by tinylobsta
I'd assume that your time-to-create would gradually become faster and faster with how quickly this particular technology is moving and with general hardware tech advancement as well.
You guys are on the cutting edge, some might say you are a little ahead of your time. Regardless it's welcome innovation and all I can do is wish you the absolute best. Fascinating stuff
MarginCalled1 t1_j6iu0ye wrote
Reply to comment by tinylobsta in Nothing, Forever — AI-generated, always streaming parody of ‘90s sitcoms by tinylobsta
I'd think the ideal way to handle this would be to create a large enough buffer, say a couple hours. It wouldn't technically be 'live' but very close to it and allow for 3d artwork generation.
Additionally you may be able to save previously generated content for reuse going forward, for example if I wanted to create a character named Daffy, instead of drawing him each time you could have AI generate him in every possible motion then refer to that going forward. That would save a ton of compute and shave a lot of time off the processing requirements.
MarginCalled1 t1_j31k47u wrote
Reply to comment by Prayers4Wuhan in NYC Bans Students and Teachers from Using ChatGPT by blueSGL
I never understood why I couldn't use a calculator after I had learnt the basics of a topic. In our time I think we should be shifting from 'Know how to do everything in your head' to 'let's teach students how to critically think, and how to use tools that are available to find solutions in an efficient manner'.
I'd argue that traditionally it was very important for the student at every level to be able to articulate a topic in their head. Today however, I'd argue that out of High School students should have a basic understanding of topics, and have the knowledge necessary to utilize these tools to augment their own ability.
Getting into a Bachelor's degree or higher I think it would be necessary to start having a much more solid understanding of each topic of study.
Detractors would rightly say 'well what If the technology becomes unavailable via a storm/blackout or the internet is knocked out, or somehow otherwise becomes inaccessible' and I think that in our modern world if that happens everything is so integrated into technology that it'll grind to a halt regardless.
Another good point is that ChatGPT is still an early product. I don't advocate using it professionally in most fields at this point in time unless it's the topic of study. However, very shortly I believe the census will change. In the past two years progress has been mind-boggling.
Everything is reliant on computation in modern society, why not augment ourselves? I can honestly say that the vast majority of math I learned in HS I've never done again, and I work with a ton of data.. it's all done and calculated via software, and verified with a calculator, which is done mostly by programmers with tools of their own. (Though I admit this needs to be looked at, 41.32% of professional programmers had a Bachelor's degree and only 21% had a Master's degree (according to 'Statista' poll data from 2022))
I have several friends that work in corporate finance and while having a drink on my back patio over the past summer they had stated that they very rarely use anything beyond basic math, the rest is done for them by machines.
Or perhaps we need to rethink what High School is meant to teach. It seems our public education system, and way of teaching is stuck in the early 1900s while we've progressed tremendously. Though I admit, as my grandfather used to say, it's easier said than done.
Edited to add Statista poll, Link
MarginCalled1 t1_j1p8ia8 wrote
Reply to comment by SurroundSwimming3494 in What sector are we going to see a big "anti" movement in next after art? by Crush4885
Exactly the kind of opinion that someone who isn't watching closely, or working in a related field would express.
This technology is advancing incredibly fast, we are at an exponential level where every 6 months the technology doubles in ability, which is faster than Moore's law by a factor of 4.
Gasparov and Deep Blue were only facing each other 23 years ago, and someone had to provide physical input of the moves that had happened. (For the younger readers: The original 2D Grand Theft Auto was made the same year, now go watch a 4k YouTube video of graphics modded GTA V)
Now multiply that pace by 4. Welcome to the AI decade.
Semiconductor, memory, and GPU companies have all started installing/using AI to help with chip research, design, materials, processing, factory/laboratory/fabrication physical designs and suggesting novel and promising ideas on all fronts.
More of any of those and AI power increases, which can drive faster, more precise research into AI continuing the multiplicative circle.
At a certain unknown point the AI will be able to read, write, bench, debug, and improve upon itself. These are all tasks that AI is doing at a lower level today. When AI can do all of this, we hit what many people suspect is the singularity, a point in time where we can't predict what will happen after due to the speed of technology advancement.
We are going to see some impressive technological progress in our lifetimes.
MarginCalled1 t1_izzcjzv wrote
Reply to comment by lovesdogsguy in The power to reverse death is here? (Kind of) by AylaDoesntLikeYou
If they can meet schedule I have some go-gurts and box juices for them!
MarginCalled1 t1_izz79i7 wrote
Reply to comment by lovesdogsguy in The power to reverse death is here? (Kind of) by AylaDoesntLikeYou
AGI by 7pm today.. I have places to be, man.
MarginCalled1 t1_iy0buuy wrote
My two front teeth, also a Surface-to-Santa missile launcher. (Someone has to take out evil robot Santa this year)
MarginCalled1 t1_iwuqrug wrote
Reply to Engineers designed a new nanoscale 3D printing material that can be printed at a speed of 100 mm/s by Shelfrock77
This reply chain has me imagining someone strapping a NOS bottle to their 3D printer and somehow finding a way to plumb it in. "Here we go babyy!" as he cranks it on.
Several days later this article is published.
MarginCalled1 t1_itnkzw9 wrote
Reply to comment by apworker37 in Kraft Heinz announces a joint venture with food tech startup NotCo to develop plant-based alternatives for its products. NotCo's AI platform is capable of replicating animal products using plants alone. Their milk uses 74% less energy, 92% less water, and generates 74% less CO2 than regular milk. by cartoonzi
Right? Do they have an option for us fat fucks that love extra mayo mixed into our fry sauce?
MarginCalled1 t1_it0yxxp wrote
Reply to comment by -Evil_Octopus- in Vaccines to treat cancer possible by 2030, say BioNTech founders by Shelfrock77
At the end of that sentence I ended with a period, then started the next with 'many people', which was not strictly inclusive.
MarginCalled1 t1_isw00ua wrote
Reply to comment by -Evil_Octopus- in Vaccines to treat cancer possible by 2030, say BioNTech founders by Shelfrock77
I didn't say you had, simply that many people in the future will.
MarginCalled1 t1_istin3y wrote
Reply to comment by -Evil_Octopus- in Vaccines to treat cancer possible by 2030, say BioNTech founders by Shelfrock77
I think we are going to see a lot more responses like your original going forward. Many people misunderstand, and undervalue the sort of work that's being done. In addition we are starting to get into the realm of nanofactories producing enzymes within your body, many people simply won't understand, or be willing to try to understand.
MarginCalled1 t1_issyapy wrote
Reply to comment by -Evil_Octopus- in Vaccines to treat cancer possible by 2030, say BioNTech founders by Shelfrock77
Yes you can, in fact they are, along with several other high profile biotechnology companies.
Unless you can show me your degree in molecular biology I choose to trust those that do, and can.
MarginCalled1 t1_iretef2 wrote
Reply to comment by JokrSmokrMidntTokr in A bold effort to cure HIV—using Crispr by Sariel007
That's ignoring a ridiculous amount of technogical and scientific advancements. 30 years ago I was excited for Duck Hunt and 2d Mario. Exponential is the key word here.
MarginCalled1 t1_ir3xb8w wrote
Reply to comment by Rumianti6 in Google AI introduces FILM, a novel neural network architecture that can be used to create high-quality slow motion videos from near-duplicate photos, achieves state-of-the-art frame interpolation results in large motion by Shelfrock77
I give it to 2030, repeat after me: Converging exponential technologies.
MarginCalled1 t1_jegzoof wrote
Reply to comment by broritto89 in Hyperloop technology could revolutionize transportation with ultra-high-speed, environmentally friendly travel up to 700 miles per hour, and student-led initiatives like HYPED are dedicated to making this a reality through innovative design and development. by intengineering
In my previous life I was an FRA certified Conductor and Engineer for Union Pacific. If FritzyBoy does anything it will be to remove the conductor and leave just the engineer and hope PTC doesn't wreck on every grade it comes across, that or ripping the train apart.
They were already trying to do that shit while I was with them and then they decided to go with this 'precision railroading' stuff and removed something like 16,000 rules, allowed train crews to shove without announced protection and a bunch of other shit.
I called all the train wrecks back in 2016 when they started whining about profits and stripping rules. Nothing that has happened is surprising to those of us that have worked in the industry. It's pure greed