I personally see remakes and remasters as games developed not for the players of the original but for the millions of people that have become gamers between their launches.

There is a crazy crazy amount of gamers that will only buy new, backward compatibility means so little to (probably) the majority of game players (not ''gamers'' as such)

Giving the new generation of gamers a quality game is not a negative, I personally have never and never will buy a remaster on the same format that I played the original. but if it can give me the same experience I felt 'back then' in a different environment, I'm all for it.

I also really like that my grandkids can play some of my best gaming moments at the same level of technology advancement for its time that I had. In the sense of I said 30 years ago 'wow this looks so real' and my memories remain of the games looking life like while in reality its block pixelated crap compared to today, where they will play and say 'wow this looks so real'

>I was researching how many users finish the game they buy.

RDR2 was included on Xbox Gamepass for several months, I like many took the opportunity to try out a game I wasn't much interested in and would never buy, only to find that I was right about my feelings, incredibly beautiful well crafted fantastic game, that just wasn't for me.

Nice statistics though, and an enjoyable graph to read. Cheers.

It's not too bad providing you 'save scum' Save often, reload when you make devastatingly bad choices. It's the only way to authentically learn the genre.

Avoid guides for builds or metas, an rpg should be played with your choices.

That's the power or nostalgia and/or a 'first exoerience'